Unconventional Photoactive Solids pp 21-28 | Cite as
Fractal-Like Exciton Kinetics in Porous Glasses, Membranes and Powders
Chapter
Abstract
We have measured the exciton (triplet) recombination (fusion, annihilation) characteristics of naphthalene-doped microporous materials. This technique yields the dynamic (spectral, fracton) dimension of the embedded naphthalene structure or the effective random walk dimension of the porous network. Temperature studies separate the energetic and geometric features of the pore space. The geometric dynamic (spectral) dimensions are mostly between 1 and 2, i.e. fractal-like, and are consistent with previous results on the static (fractal or Euclidean) dimensions of the porous vycor glass samples.
Keywords
Porous Glass Percolation Cluster Continuous Time Random Walk Nominal Pore Size Cellulose Filter Paper
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.U. Even, K. Rademann, J.Jortner, N. Manor and R. Reisfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42:2164 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Klafter, A. Blumen and G. Zumofen, J. Stat. Phys. 36: 561 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.C. L. Yang, P. Evesque and M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. 89: 3442 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.A. J. Katz and A. H. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54:1325(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Y. Gefen,A. Aharony and S. Alexander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50:77(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.S. Alexander and R. Orbach, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 54: L625 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.R. Rammal and G. Toulouse, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. L13 (1983).Google Scholar
- 8.W. D. Dozier, J. M. Drake and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. Lett. (Jan. 86).Google Scholar
- 9.L. A. Harmon and R. Kopelman, J. Lumin. 31 /32: 660 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.E. I. Newhouse and R. Kopelman, J. Lumin. 31 /32: 651 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Kopelman, J. Stat. Phys. 42: 185 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.R. Kopelman and P. Argyrakís, J. Chem. Phys. 72: 3053 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.P. G. de Gennes, C. R. Acad. Scí. Ser. A296: 881 (1983).Google Scholar
- 14.I. Webman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52: 220 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.K. Kang and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52: 955 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.P. Meakin and H. E. Stanley, J. Phys. A 17: L173 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P. W. Klymko and R. Kopelman, J. Phys. Chem. 87: 4565 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.P. Evesque and J. Duran, J. ChemPhys. 80: 3016 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.J. S. Newhouse, P. Argyrakis and R. Kopelman, Chem. Phem. Phys. Lett.107:3747(1984).Google Scholar
- 20.
- 21.R. Kopelman, P. W. Klymko, J. S. Newhouse and L. W. Anacker, Phys Rev. B 29: 3747 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.L. W. Anacker and R. Kopelman, J. Chem. Phys. 81: 6402 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.D. C. Ahlgren, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan (1979).Google Scholar
- 24.J. S. Newhouse, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan (1985).Google Scholar
- 25.L. A. Harmon, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan (1985).Google Scholar
- 26.L. W. Anacker, R. Kopelman and J. S. Newhouse, J. Stat. Phys. 36: 591 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.L. W. Anacker, R. Kopelman and J. S. Newhouse, J. Stat. Phys. 36: 591 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.L. W. Anacker, L. Lee and R. Kopelman (unpublished).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Press, New York 1988