Digestive Plasticity in Avian Energetics and Feeding Ecology

  • William H. Karasov

Abstract

This chapter focuses on changes in gastrointestinal (GI) structure and function and how they influence the supply of energy and nutrients for maintenance and production (growth, storage, and reproduction). There is considerable evidence that digestive features are influenced by factors such as diet quality and quantity in species from many avian orders including the Anseriformes (Ankney 1977; Drobney 1984; Prop and Vulink 1992), Galliformes (Gasaway 1976; Moss 1983), Columbiformes (Kenward and Sibly 1977), and Passeriformes (Davis 1961; Al- Dabbagh et al. 1987; Brugger 1991; Walsberg and Thompson 1990). The likely ecological importance of digestive adjustments is suggested by a number of theoretical arguments and some observations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afik, D. and W. H. Karasov. 1995. The tradeoffs between digestion rate and efficiency in the Yellow-rumped Warbler, and its ecological implications. Ecology 76:2247–2257.Google Scholar
  2. Afik, D., E. Caviedes Vidal, C. Martinez del Rio, and W. H. Karasov. 1995. Dietary modulation of intestinal hydrolytic enzymes in Yellow-rumped Warblers. Am. J. Physiol.269: R413–R420.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Dabbagh, K. Y., J. H. Jiad, and I. N. Waheed. 1987. The influence of diet on the intestine length of the White-cheeked Bulbul. Ornis Scand. 18:150–152.Google Scholar
  4. Alerstam, T. and A. Lindstrom. 1990. Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy and safety. In Bird Migration: Physiology, Ecophysiology, ed. E. Gwinner, pp. 331–351. Springer-Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Joborae, F. F. 1980. The influence of diet on the gut morphology of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Ph.D. diss., Oxford University, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Ankney, C. D. 1977 Feeding and digestive organ size in breeding Lesser Snow Geese. Auk 94:275–282.Google Scholar
  7. Ankney, C. D. and D. M. Scott. 1988. Size of digestive organs in breeding Brown-headed Cowbirds, Molothrus ater, relative to diet. Can. J. Zool. 66:1254–1257.Google Scholar
  8. Atchley, W. R. 1984. Ontogeny, timing of development, and genetic variance-covariance structure. Am. Nat. 123:519–540.Google Scholar
  9. Bairlein, F. 1985. Efficiency of food utilization during fat deposition in the long distance migratory garden warbler, Sylvia borin. Oecologia 68:118–125.Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, G. G. and V G. Thomas. 1987. Digestive organ morphology, diet, and guild structure of North American Anatidae. Can. J. Zool. 65:1812–1817.Google Scholar
  11. Barnes, A., Y. Yom-Tov, and J. Friedman. 1991. Does ingestion by birds affect seed germination? Funct. Ecol. 5:394–402.Google Scholar
  12. Bednekoff, P. A. and A. I. Houston. 1994. Avian daily foraging patterns: effects of digestive constraints and variability. Evol. Ecol. 8:36–52.Google Scholar
  13. Belovsky, G. E. 1984. Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models. Am. Nat. 124:97–115.Google Scholar
  14. Berthold, P. 1975. Migration: Control and metabolic physiology. In Avian Biology; vol. 5, eds. D. S. Farner, and J. R. King, pp. 77–128. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Biebach, H., W. Friedrich, and G. Heine. 1986. Interaction of bodymass, fat, foraging and stopover period in trans-sahara migrating passerine birds. Oecologia 69:370–379.Google Scholar
  16. Biviano, A. B., C. Martinez del Rio, and D. L. Phillips. 1993. Post-hatching ontogenesis of sucrase and maltase in chickens (Gallus gallus) fed contrasting purified diets. J. Comp. Physiol. 163:508–518.Google Scholar
  17. Blem, C. R. 1980. The energetics of migration. In Animal Migration, Orientation, and Navigation, ed. S. A. Gauthreaux, pp. 175–224. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Boag, P. T. 1987. Effects of nestling diet on growth and adult size of Zebra Finches (Poephila guttata). Auk 104:155–166.Google Scholar
  19. Brugger, K. E. 1991. Anatomical adaptation of the gut to diet in Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk 108:562–567.Google Scholar
  20. Brugger, K. E. 1992. Repellency of sucrose to captive American Robins. J. Midi. Manage. 56:794–799.Google Scholar
  21. Castro, G., N. Stoyan, and J. P. Myers. 1989. Assimilation efficiency in birds: a function of taxon or food type? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 92A:271–278.Google Scholar
  22. Coleman, J. D. 1974. Breakdown rates of foods ingested by Starlings. J. Wildl. Manage. 38:910–912.Google Scholar
  23. Courtney, S. P. and R. Salabanks. 1992. It takes guts to handle fruits. Oikos 65:163–166.Google Scholar
  24. Custer, T. W. and F. A. Pitelka. 1975. Correction factors for digestion rates for prey taken by Snow Bunting (Plectrophenax nivalis). Condor 77:210–212.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, J. 1961. Some seasonal changes in morphology of the Rufous-sided Towhee. Condor 63:313–321.Google Scholar
  26. Diamond, J. M. 1991. Evolutionary design of intestinal nutrient absorption: enough but not too much. News Physiol. Sci. 6:92–96.Google Scholar
  27. Diamond, J. M. and W. H. Karasov. 1984. Effect of dietary carbohydrate on monosaccharide uptake by mouse small intestine in vitro. J. Physiol 349:419–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Drobney, R. D. 1984. Effect of diet on visceral morphology of breeding Wood Ducks. Auk 101:93–98.Google Scholar
  29. Duke, G. E. 1989. Gastrointestinal motility and its regulation. Poult. Sci. 61:1245–1256.Google Scholar
  30. Dykstra, C. R. and W. H. Karasov. 1992. Changes in gut structure and function in House Wrens (Troglodytes aedori) in response to increased energy demands. Physiol. Zool. 65:422–442.Google Scholar
  31. Dykstra, C. R. and W. H. Karasov. 1993a. Nesting energetics of House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon) in relation to maximal rates of energy flow. Auk 110:481–491.Google Scholar
  32. Dykstra, C. R. and W. H. Karasov. 1993b. Daily energy expenditure by nestling House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Condor 95:1028–1030.Google Scholar
  33. Escribano, E, B. I. Rahn, and J. L. Sell. 1988. Development of lipase activity in yolk membrane and pancreas of young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 67:1089–1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Feare, C. J. and M. McGinnity. 1986. The relative importance of invertebrates and barley in the diet of Starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Bird Study 33:164–167.Google Scholar
  35. Fenna, L. and D. A. Boag. 1974. Adaptive significance of the caeca in Japanese quail and spruce grouse (Galliformes). Can. J. Zool. 52:1577–1584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gasaway, W. C.1976. Seasonal variation in diet, volatile fatty acid production and size of the cecum of Rock Ptarmigan. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53 A: 109–114.Google Scholar
  37. Green, R. E., M. R. W. Rands, and S. J. Moreby. 1987. Species differences in diet and the development of seed digestion in partridge chicks Perdixperdix and Alectoris rufa. Ibis 129:511–514.Google Scholar
  38. Guglielmo, C. G. and W. H. Karasov. 1993. Endogenous losses of mass and energy in Ruffed Grouse. Auk 110:386–390.Google Scholar
  39. Guglielmo, C. G., W. J. Jakubas, and W. H. Karasov. 1996. Nutritional costs of a plant secondary metabolite to an avian herbivore: the basis for avoidance of coniferyl benzoate in quaking aspen flower buds by Ruffed Grouse. Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  40. Halse, S. A. 1984. Food intake, digestive efficiency, and retention time in spur-winged geese Plectropterus gambensis. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 14:106–110.Google Scholar
  41. Hixon, M. A. 1982. Energy maximizers and time minimizers: theory and reality. Am. Nat. 119:596–599.Google Scholar
  42. Hulan, H. W. and F. H. Bird. 1972. Effect of fat level in isonitrogenous diets on the composition of avian pancreatic juice. J. Nutr. 102:459–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Imondi, A. R. and F. H. Bird. 1966. The turnover of intestinal epithelium in the chick. Poult. Sci. 45:142–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Imondi, A. R. and F. H. Bird. 1967. Effects of dietary protein level on growth and proteolytic activity of the avian pancreas. J. Nutr. 91:421–428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jakubas, W. J., W. H. Karasov, and C. G. Guglielmo. 1993. Ruffed grouse tolerance and bio-transformation of the plant secondary metabolite coniferyl benzoate. Condor 95:625–640.Google Scholar
  46. Jehl, J. R. 1994. Nothing is forever: cyclical reorganization of body composition in Eared Grebes. J. Ornithol. 135:103(abstract).Google Scholar
  47. Karasov, W. H. 1988. Nutrient transport across vertebrate intestine. In Advances in Compar-ative and Environmental Physiology, ed. R. Gilles, pp. 131–172. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. Karasov, W. H. 1990. Digestion in birds: chemical and physiological determinants and eco-logical implications. In Avian Foraging: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, eds. M. L. Morrison, C. J. Ralph, J. Verner, and J. R. Jehl, Studies in Avian Biology No. 13, pp. 391–415. Cooper Ornithological Society, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  49. Karasov, W. H. 1992. Tests of the adaptive modulation hypothesis for dietary control of in-testinal nutrient transport. Am. J. Physiol 263:R496–R502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Karasov, W. H. 1994. Digestive adaptations in avian omnivores. In Nutrition in a Sustainable Environment, ed. M. Wahlqvist, Proc. XVth Int. Cong. Nutr. pp. 494–497. Smith-Gordon, Edinburgh: UK.Google Scholar
  51. Karasov, W. H. and S. J. Cork. 1994. Glucose absorption by a nectarivorous bird: the passive pathway is paramount. Am. J. Physiol. 267:G18–G26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Karasov, W. H. and S. J. Cork. 1996. Test of a reactor-based digestion optimization model for nectar-eating Rainbow Lorikeets. Physiol. Zool. 69:117–138.Google Scholar
  53. Karasov, W. H. and J. M. Diamond. 1983. Adaptive regulation of sugar and amino acid transport by vertebrate intestine. Am. J. Physiol 245:G443–G462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Karasov, W. H. and I. D. Hume. 1996. Vertebrate gastrointestinal system. In Handbook of Comparative Physiology, ed. W. Dantzler, in press. American Physiological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Karasov, W. H. and D. J. Levey. 1990. Digestive system tradeoffs and adaptations of frugivorous birds. Physiol Zool. 63:1248–1270.Google Scholar
  56. Karasov, W. H., M. W. Meyer, and B. W. Darken. 1992. Tannic acid inhibition of amino acid and sugar absorption by mouse and vole intestine: tests following acute and subchronic exposure. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:719–736.Google Scholar
  57. Karasov, W. H., D. Phan, J. M. Diamond, and F. L. Carpenter. 1986. Food passage and intestinal nutrient absorption in hummingbirds. Auk 103:453–464.Google Scholar
  58. Karasov, W. H., D. Afik, and B. W. Darken. 1996. Do Northern Bobwhite quail modulate intestinal nutrient absorption in response to dietary change? A test of an adaptational hypothesis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  59. Kehoe, F. P. and C. D. Ankney. 1985. Variation in digestive organ size among five species of diving ducks (Avthva spp.). Can. J. Zool. 63:2339–2342.Google Scholar
  60. Kehoe, F. P., C. D. Ankney, and R. T. Alisauskus. 1988. Effects of dietary fiber and diet di-versity on digestive organs of captive mallards (Anas platyrynchos). Can. J. Zool. 66:1597–1602.Google Scholar
  61. Kenward, R. E. and R. M. Sibly. 1977. A woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) feeding prefer-ence explained by a digestive bottleneck. J. Appl. Ecol. 14:815–826.Google Scholar
  62. Kenward, R. E. and R. M. Sibly. 1978. Woodpigeon feeding behavior at Brassica-sites. A field and laboratory investigation of woodpigeon feeding behavior during adoption and maintenance of a Brassica diet. Anim. Behav. 26:778–790.Google Scholar
  63. King, J. R. 1961. The bioenergetics of vernal premigratory fat deposition in the White- crowned Sparrow. Condor 63:128–142.Google Scholar
  64. Klaassen, M. and H. Biebach. 1994. Energetics of fattening and starvation in the longdistance migratory garden warbler, Sylvia borin, during the migratory stage. J. Comp. Physiol. B164:362–371.Google Scholar
  65. Koenig, W. D. 1991. The effects of tannins and lipids on digestion of acorns by Acorn Woodpeckers. Auk 108:79–88.Google Scholar
  66. Konarzewski, M., J. Kozlowski, and M. Ziolko. 1989. Optimal allocation of energy to growth of alimentary tract in birds. Funct. Ecol. 3:589–596.Google Scholar
  67. Konarzewski, M., C. Lilja, J. Kozlowski, and B. Lewonczuk. 1990. On the optimal growth of the alimentary tract in avian postembryonic development. J. Zool. (London) 222:89–101.Google Scholar
  68. Krogdahl, A. and J. L. Sell. 1989. Influence of age on lipase, amylase and protease activities in pancreatic tissue and intestinal contents of young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 68:1561–1568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Langslow, D. R. 1976. Weights of blackcap on migration. Ringing and Migration 1:78–92.Google Scholar
  70. Lei, K. Y. and S. J. Slinger. 1970. Energy utilization in the chick in relation to certain envi-ronmental stress. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50:285–292.Google Scholar
  71. Levey, D. J. and M. L. Cipollini. 1996. Glucose absorption is primarily passive in quail. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  72. Levey, D. J. and A. Grajal. 1991. Evolutionary implications of fruit-processing limitations in Cedar Waxwings. Am. Nat. 138:171–189.Google Scholar
  73. Levey, D. J. and W. H. Karasov. 1989. Digestive responses of temperate birds switched to fruit or insect diets. Auk 106:675–686.Google Scholar
  74. Levey, D. J. and W. H. Karasov. 1992. Digestive modulation in a seasonal frugivore, the American Robin (Turdus migratorius). Am. J. Physiol. 262:G711–G718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Levey, D. J., and W. H. Karasov. 1994. Gut passage of insects by European starlings and a comparison with other species. Auk 111:478–481.Google Scholar
  76. Lilja, C. 1983. A comparative study of postnatal growth and organ development in some species of birds. Growth 47:317–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lilja, C., I. Sperber, and H. L. Marks. 1985. Postnatal growth and organ development in Japanese quail selected for high growth rate. Growth 49:51–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Lindstrom, A. 1991. Maximum fat deposition rates in migrating birds. Ornis Scand. 22:12–19.Google Scholar
  79. Malcarney, H. L., C. Martinez del Rio, and V Apanius. 1994. Sucrose intolerance in birds: simple nonlethal diagnostic methods and consequences for assimilation of complex carbohydrates. Auk 111:170–177.Google Scholar
  80. Malone, C. R. 1965. Dispersal of plankton: rate of food passage in mallard ducks. J. Wildl. Manage. 29:529–533.Google Scholar
  81. Marks, H. L. 1988. Body-weight in Coturnix following long-term selection under different environments. In Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, ed. H. Ouellet pp.1434–1443. National Museum of Natural Sciences, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  82. Martinez del Rio, C. 1990. Dietary, phylogenetic, and ecological correlates of intestinal su- crase and maltase activity in birds. Physiol Zool 63:987–1011.Google Scholar
  83. Martinez del Rio, C. and W. H. Karasov. 1990. Digestion strategies in nectar- and fruit- eating birds and the sugar composition of plant rewards. Am. Nat. 136:618–637.Google Scholar
  84. Martinez del Rio, C. and C. Restrepo. 1993. Ecological and behavioral consequences of di-gestion in frugivorous animals. Vegetatio 107/108:205–216.Google Scholar
  85. Martinez del Rio, C., B. R. Stevens, D. Daneke, and P. T. Andreadis. 1988. Physiological correlates of preference and aversion for sugars in three species of birds. Physiol. Zool. 61:222–229.Google Scholar
  86. Martinez del Rio, C., K. E. Brugger, J. L. Rios, M. E. Vergara, and M. Witmer. 1995. An experimental and comparative study of dietary modulation of intestinal enzymes in the European Starling. Physiol. Zool. 68:490–511.Google Scholar
  87. Mateos, G. G., J. L. Sell, and J. A. Eastwood. 1982. Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat. Poult. Sci. 61:94–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Meier, A. H. and A. J. Fivizzani. 1980. Physiology of migration. In Animal Migration, Orientation, and Navigation, ed. S. A. Gauthreaux, pp. 225–282. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Moss, R. 1974. Winter diets, gut lengths, and interspecific competition in Alaskan ptarmigan. Auk 91:737–746.Google Scholar
  90. Moss, R. 1983. Gut size, body weight and digestion of winter food by grouse and ptarmigan. Condor 85:185–193.Google Scholar
  91. Murphy, S. R., N. Reid, Y. Zhaugui, and W. N. Venables. 1993. Differential passage time of mistletoe fruits through the gut of honeyeaters and flowerpeckers: effects on seedling establishment. Oecologia 93:171–176.Google Scholar
  92. Murray, K. G., S. Russell, C. M. Picone, K. Winnett-Murray, W. Sherwood, and M. L. Kuhlmann. 1994. Fruit laxatives and seed passage rates in frugivores: consequences for plant reproductive success. Ecology 75:989–994.Google Scholar
  93. Nir, I., Z. Nitsan, Y. Dror, and N. Shapira. 1978. Influence of overfeeding on growth, obesity and intestinal tract in young chicks of light and heavy breeds. Br. J. Nutr. 39:27–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Obst, B. S. and J. M. Diamond. 1992. Ontogenesis of intestinal nutrient transport in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) and its relation to growth. Auk 109:451–464.Google Scholar
  95. Owen-Smith, N. and P. Novellie. 1982. What should a clever ungulate eat? Am. Nat. 119:151–178.Google Scholar
  96. Pappenheimer, J. R. 1990. Paracellular intestinal absorption of glucose, creatinine, and mannitol in normal animals: relation to body size. Am. J. Physiol. 259:G290–G299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Pappenheimer, J. R. 1993. On the coupling of membrane digestion with intestinal absorption of sugars and amino acids. Am. J. Physiol. 265:G409–G417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Penry, D. L. and P. A. Jumars. 1987. Modeling animal guts as chemical reactors. Am. Nat. 129:69–96.Google Scholar
  99. Piersma, T., A. Koolhaas, and A. Dekinga. 1993. Interactions between stomach structure and diet choice in shorebirds. Auk 110:552–564.Google Scholar
  100. Prop, J. and T. Vulink. 1992. Digestion by barnacle geese in the annual cycle: the interplay between retention time and food quality. Funct. Ecol. 6:180–190.Google Scholar
  101. Redig, P. T. 1989. The avian ceca: obligate combusion chambers or facultative afterburners?—the conditioning influence of diet. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 3:66–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Remington, T. E. 1989. Why do grouse have ceca? A test of the fiber digestion theory. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 3:87–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Ricklefs, R. E. 1983. Avian postnatal development. In Avian Biology; vol. VII, eds. D. S. Farner, J. R. King, and K. C. Parkes, pp. 2–83. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  104. Robbins, C. T. 1993. Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  105. Robbins, C. T., A. E. Hagerman, P. J. Austin, C. McArthur, and T. A. Hanley. 1991. Varia-tion in mammalian physiological responses to a condensed tannin and its ecological im-plications. J. Mamm. 72:480–486.Google Scholar
  106. Savory, C. J. and M. J. Gentle. 1976. Effects of dietary dilution with fibre on the food intake and gut dimensions of Japanese quail. Br. Poult. Sci. 17:561–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 11:369–404.Google Scholar
  108. Sell, J. L., O. Koldovsky, and B. L. Reid. 1989. Intestinal disaccharidases of young turkeys: Temporal development and influence of diet composition. Poult. Sci. 68:265–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Sell, J. L., A. Krogdahl, and N. Hanyu. 1986. Influence of age on utilization of supplemental fats by young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 65:546–554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Sibly, R. M. 1981. Strategies of digestion and defecation. In Physiological Ecology, eds. C. R. Townsend, and P. Calow, pp. 109–139. Sinouer Assoc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  111. Siddons, R. C. 1972. Effect of diet on disaccharidase activity in the chick. Biochem. J. 112:51–59.Google Scholar
  112. Smith, J. N. M. and P. Arcese. 1988. Effects of supplemental food on growth and adult size in the Song Sparrow. In Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologicus, ed. H. Ouellet, pp. 1416–1423. National Museum of Natural Sciences, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  113. Smith, M. W. and M. A. Peacock. 1989. Comparative aspects of microvillus development in avian and mammalian enterocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 93A:617–622.Google Scholar
  114. Speakman, J. R. 1987. Apparent absorption efficiencies for redshank (Tringa totanus) and oystercather (Haematopus ostralegus): implications for the predictions of optimal foraging models. Am. Nat. 130:677–691.Google Scholar
  115. Starck, J. M. 1993. Evolution of avian ontogenies. In Current Ornithology, vol. 10, ed. D. M. Power, pp. 275–366. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  116. Storey, M. L. and N. K. Allen. 1982. Apparent and true metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for mature, nonlaying female Embden Geese. Poult. Sci. 59:1275–1279.Google Scholar
  117. Temeles, E. J. 1989. The effect of prey consumption on territorial defense by harriers; differential responses to neighbors versus floaters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24:239–243.Google Scholar
  118. Tiebout, H. M. III 1989. Tests of a model of food passage rates in hummingbirds. Auk 106:203–208.Google Scholar
  119. Vispo, C. and W. H. Karasov. 1996. An elusive symbiosis: the interaction of avian gut microbes and their host, a bird’s-eye view. In Gastrointestinal Microbial Ecology, Ch. 5 ed. R. I. Mackie, (in press). Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  120. Walsberg, G. E. and C. W. Thompson. 1990. Annual changes in gizzard size and function in a frugivorous bird. Condor 92:794–795.Google Scholar
  121. Weathers, W. W. 1992. Scaling nestling energy requirements. Ibis 134:142–153.Google Scholar
  122. Weathers, W. W. and K. A. Sullivan. 1989. Juvenile foraging proficiency, parental effort, and avian reproductive success. Ecol. Monogr. 59:223–246.Google Scholar
  123. Weiner, J. 1992. Physiological limits to sustainable energy budgets in birds and mammals: ecological implications. Trends in Ecol Evol. 7:384–388.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Karasov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations