Selected Topics on Electron Physics pp 305-322 | Cite as
Coherent Excitation of He Atoms by Proton Impact
Abstract
Theoretical and experimental studies of excitation in ion-atom collisions have been carried out extensively for many years. Most studies were concerned with the cross section of a particular channel. However, these cross sections yield only extremely restricted information about the actual state of the atoms after the collision with the ion, as the collisionally excited states generally differ from the eigenstates of the atomic system. In particular, the center of the charge cloud of the excited electron may not coincide with that of the nucleus. This possible occurrence of electric dipole moments after collisional excitation was considered already in 1915 by N. Bohr as mentioned by W Pauli in his review article about the old quantum theory1. A complete description of the excitation process can be obtained by introducing excitation matrices2. When measuring cross sections, one is measuring the trace of the excitation matrix (the sum of the diagonal elements). The size of the matrix is determined by the energetic resolution of the experimental setup. In order to study the different diagonal elements of the excitation matrix, special experimental techniques are required. The study of polarization and angular distribution of the emitted light after the collision yield some more information, but for a complete determination of the substate population for states with angular momenta L > 1, sophisticated methods, like level-crossing techniques, must be employed3.
Keywords
Triplet State Proton Beam Electric Dipole Moment Excitation Rate Coherence ParameterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- W. Pauli: Handbuch der Physik XX3II (1926) 1 (The reference to the work of N. Bohr is on page 140)Google Scholar
- O. Nedelec: Journ. Physique 27 (1966) 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- G. v. Oppen: Comments At. Mol. Phys. 15 (1984) 87Google Scholar
- L.A. Sellin, J.R Mowat, R.S. Peterson, P.M. Griffin, R. Laubert, H.H. Haselton: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973)1335Google Scholar
- C.C. Havener, N. Rouze, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(1984) 1049Google Scholar
- T.G. Eck: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31(1973) 270Google Scholar
- LA. Sellin, L. Liljeby, S. Mannervik, S. Hultberg: Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(1979) 570Google Scholar
- R. Krotkov, J. Stone: Phys. Rev. A22(1980) 473Google Scholar
- CV.C. Havener, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley, N.H.,Tolk, J.C. Tully: Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(1982) 926Google Scholar
- J.R Ashburn, RA. Cline, P.J.M. van der Burgt, W.B. Westerveld, J. S. Risley: Phys. Rev. A41(1990) 2407Google Scholar
- J. Burgdörfer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 43(1979) 505Google Scholar
- J. Burgdörfer: Z. Phys. A - Atoms and Nuclei - 309(1983) 285Google Scholar
- A. Jain, CD. Lin, W. Fritsch: Phys. Rev. A35(1987) 3180Google Scholar
- A.S. Aynacioglu, S. Heumann, G. v. Oppen: Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 1879ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- S. Heumann: Thesis, TU Berlin D83 (1993)Google Scholar
- S. Büttrich, G. v. Oppen: Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3778ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- G. v. Oppen, S. Büttrich: Z. Phys. D 30(1994) 193Google Scholar
- A S. Aynacioglu, S. Heumann, G. v. Oppen: Supplement to Z. Phys. D 21 (1991) S 297Google Scholar
- M. Hanselmann, AS. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen: Physics Letters A175(1993) 314Google Scholar
- W.C. Martin: Phys. Rev. A36(1987) 3575Google Scholar
- G. v. Oppen: Physica Scripta T26 (1989) 34Google Scholar
- D. Kaiser, Y.-Q. Liu, G. v. Oppen: J. Phys. B 26(1993) 363Google Scholar
- E.W. Thomas: Excitation in Heavy Particle Collisions, Wiley-Interscience (New York, 1972 )Google Scholar
- E.U. Condon, G.H. Shortley: The Theory of Atomic Spectra, At The University Press (Cambridge, 1964 )Google Scholar
- A.R. Edmonds: angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press (1960)Google Scholar
- D. Krause, E.A. Soltysik: Phys. Rev. 175(1968) 142Google Scholar
- G.D. Myers, J.D. Ambrose, P.B. James, J.J. Leventhal: Phys. Rev. A18(1978) 85Google Scholar
- A.S. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen, R Müller: Z. Phys. D 6(1987) 155Google Scholar
- S. Büttrich: Thesis, TU Berlin, in preparationGoogle Scholar
- W.D. Perschmann, G. v. Oppen, D. Szostak: Z. Phys. A 311(1983) 49Google Scholar
- A.S. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen, W.D. Perschmann, D. Szostak: Z. Phys. A 303(1981) 97Google Scholar
- H.A. Bethe, E.E. Salpeter: Handbuch der Physik 35, Springer Verlag (1957)Google Scholar
- J. van Eck, F.J. de Heer, J. Kistenmaker: Physica 30(1964) 1171Google Scholar
- M. Anton, D. Detleffsen, K.-H. Schartner, A. Werner: J. Phys. B 26(1993) 2005Google Scholar
- J.M. Rost, J.S. Briggs: J. Phys. B 24(1991) 4293Google Scholar
- G. v. Oppen: Europhys. Lett. 27(1994) 279Google Scholar
- W.Paul,Physik. Blätter 46(1990)227Google Scholar