Coherent Excitation of He Atoms by Proton Impact

  • Bengt Skogvall
  • Gebhard von Oppen
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PAMO)

Abstract

Theoretical and experimental studies of excitation in ion-atom collisions have been carried out extensively for many years. Most studies were concerned with the cross section of a particular channel. However, these cross sections yield only extremely restricted information about the actual state of the atoms after the collision with the ion, as the collisionally excited states generally differ from the eigenstates of the atomic system. In particular, the center of the charge cloud of the excited electron may not coincide with that of the nucleus. This possible occurrence of electric dipole moments after collisional excitation was considered already in 1915 by N. Bohr as mentioned by W Pauli in his review article about the old quantum theory1. A complete description of the excitation process can be obtained by introducing excitation matrices2. When measuring cross sections, one is measuring the trace of the excitation matrix (the sum of the diagonal elements). The size of the matrix is determined by the energetic resolution of the experimental setup. In order to study the different diagonal elements of the excitation matrix, special experimental techniques are required. The study of polarization and angular distribution of the emitted light after the collision yield some more information, but for a complete determination of the substate population for states with angular momenta L > 1, sophisticated methods, like level-crossing techniques, must be employed3.

Keywords

Triplet State Proton Beam Electric Dipole Moment Excitation Rate Coherence Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Pauli: Handbuch der Physik XX3II (1926) 1 (The reference to the work of N. Bohr is on page 140)Google Scholar
  2. O. Nedelec: Journ. Physique 27 (1966) 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. G. v. Oppen: Comments At. Mol. Phys. 15 (1984) 87Google Scholar
  4. L.A. Sellin, J.R Mowat, R.S. Peterson, P.M. Griffin, R. Laubert, H.H. Haselton: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973)1335Google Scholar
  5. C.C. Havener, N. Rouze, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(1984) 1049Google Scholar
  6. T.G. Eck: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31(1973) 270Google Scholar
  7. LA. Sellin, L. Liljeby, S. Mannervik, S. Hultberg: Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(1979) 570Google Scholar
  8. R. Krotkov, J. Stone: Phys. Rev. A22(1980) 473Google Scholar
  9. CV.C. Havener, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley, N.H.,Tolk, J.C. Tully: Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(1982) 926Google Scholar
  10. J.R Ashburn, RA. Cline, P.J.M. van der Burgt, W.B. Westerveld, J. S. Risley: Phys. Rev. A41(1990) 2407Google Scholar
  11. J. Burgdörfer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 43(1979) 505Google Scholar
  12. J. Burgdörfer: Z. Phys. A - Atoms and Nuclei - 309(1983) 285Google Scholar
  13. A. Jain, CD. Lin, W. Fritsch: Phys. Rev. A35(1987) 3180Google Scholar
  14. A.S. Aynacioglu, S. Heumann, G. v. Oppen: Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 1879ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Heumann: Thesis, TU Berlin D83 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. S. Büttrich, G. v. Oppen: Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3778ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. G. v. Oppen, S. Büttrich: Z. Phys. D 30(1994) 193Google Scholar
  18. A S. Aynacioglu, S. Heumann, G. v. Oppen: Supplement to Z. Phys. D 21 (1991) S 297Google Scholar
  19. M. Hanselmann, AS. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen: Physics Letters A175(1993) 314Google Scholar
  20. W.C. Martin: Phys. Rev. A36(1987) 3575Google Scholar
  21. G. v. Oppen: Physica Scripta T26 (1989) 34Google Scholar
  22. D. Kaiser, Y.-Q. Liu, G. v. Oppen: J. Phys. B 26(1993) 363Google Scholar
  23. E.W. Thomas: Excitation in Heavy Particle Collisions, Wiley-Interscience (New York, 1972 )Google Scholar
  24. E.U. Condon, G.H. Shortley: The Theory of Atomic Spectra, At The University Press (Cambridge, 1964 )Google Scholar
  25. A.R. Edmonds: angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press (1960)Google Scholar
  26. D. Krause, E.A. Soltysik: Phys. Rev. 175(1968) 142Google Scholar
  27. G.D. Myers, J.D. Ambrose, P.B. James, J.J. Leventhal: Phys. Rev. A18(1978) 85Google Scholar
  28. A.S. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen, R Müller: Z. Phys. D 6(1987) 155Google Scholar
  29. S. Büttrich: Thesis, TU Berlin, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  30. W.D. Perschmann, G. v. Oppen, D. Szostak: Z. Phys. A 311(1983) 49Google Scholar
  31. A.S. Aynacioglu, G. v. Oppen, W.D. Perschmann, D. Szostak: Z. Phys. A 303(1981) 97Google Scholar
  32. H.A. Bethe, E.E. Salpeter: Handbuch der Physik 35, Springer Verlag (1957)Google Scholar
  33. J. van Eck, F.J. de Heer, J. Kistenmaker: Physica 30(1964) 1171Google Scholar
  34. M. Anton, D. Detleffsen, K.-H. Schartner, A. Werner: J. Phys. B 26(1993) 2005Google Scholar
  35. J.M. Rost, J.S. Briggs: J. Phys. B 24(1991) 4293Google Scholar
  36. G. v. Oppen: Europhys. Lett. 27(1994) 279Google Scholar
  37. W.Paul,Physik. Blätter 46(1990)227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bengt Skogvall
    • 1
  • Gebhard von Oppen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Strahlungs- und KernphysikTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations