Stability of Materials pp 339-345 | Cite as
Competing Mechanisms for Ordering Tendencies in BCC CuAuZn2 and FCC AuFe Alloys
Abstract
We have implemented a first-principles theory of short-range order in high-temperature, disordered, multicomponent alloys (and magnetic and paramagnetic binary alloys) which determines the atomic (and magnetic) pair-correlations from the underlying local-density-functional electronic structure of the chemically (homogeneously) random alloy. Features in diffuse scattering intensities may be directly related to their electronic origins, for microscopic, system-dependent understanding of the ordering tendencies, or atomic short-range order (ASRO). We discuss briefly the electronic origins, and the novel competitions they produce, for the ordering tendencies in two different alloy systems. First, we discuss the ASRO indicating a high-temperature B2-type state in BCC (Heusler) CuAuZn2; the ordering tendency is determined by a competition between the different types of order associated with each of the three independent pair-correlations, with the dominant ordering originating from band filling. Second, the controversial < 1,1/2,0 > ASRO observed in FCC AuFe alloys (prepared at high-temperature and rapidly quenched) arises from a competition between ordering (from hybridization) and clustering (from band-filling) tendencies within the same pair-correlation.
Keywords
Heusler Alloy Band Filling Electronic Origin Multi Component Alloy Anti Bonding StatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.B.L. Györffy G.M. Stocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 374 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.B.L. GyörfFy et al, in Alloy Phase Stability, edited by G. Stocks A. Gonis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 421.Google Scholar
- 3.J. Stauntonet et al, in Alloy Phase Stability, edited by G. Stocks A. Gonis (KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 469Google Scholar
- 4.J.B. Staunton, D.D. Johnson, F.J. Pinski, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1450 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D.D. Johnson, J.B. Staunton, F.J. Pinski, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1473 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.D.D. Johnson et al, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9701 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J.D. Althoff, D.D. Johnson, F.J. Pinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 138 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.J.D. Althoff, D.D. Johnson, J.B. Staunton F.J. Pinski, to appear in Phys. Rev. B. Google Scholar
- 9.D. de Fontaine, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 34, 1285 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J.D. AlthoffD.D. Johnson, submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
- 11.L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1468 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.I. Masanskii, V. Tokar, T. Grishchenko, Phys. Rev. B44, 4647 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.V. Gorsky, Z. Phys. 50, 64 (1928).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.W. Bragg E. Wilhams, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 145, 699 (1934); A 152, 231 (1935). Google Scholar
- 15.F.J. Pinski et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 766 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.L. Muldawer, J. of Applied Physics 37, 2062 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Y. Murakami, N. Nakanishi, S. Kachi, Acta Metal. 19, 93 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed., edited by B. Massalski, H. Okamoto, P. R. Subramanian, L. Kacprzak (ASM International, New York, 1990). Google Scholar
- 19.M FLing, J.B. Staunton, D.D. Johnson, F JPinski, accepted Phys. Rev.: Rapid Comm. Google Scholar
- 20.M.F. Ling, J.B. Staunton and D.D. Johnson, Europhys. Lett. 25, 631 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.M.F. Ling, J.B. Staunton D.D. Johnson, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 6, 5981 and 6001 (1994). Google Scholar