Frontiers in Global Optimization pp 391-401 | Cite as
A Multi Dimensional Assignment Formulation for New Product Development Problems
Abstract
This paper considers the application of an upper bounding technique to a maximization formulation of new product development (NPD) problems. NPD procedures are increasingly being used by many high-technology firms to rapidly develop multiple new products lines using a small but flexible workforce and infrastructure. Mathematically speaking, these problems are quite difficult and may be described as the allocation of heterogeneous resources to heterogeneous but perhaps interdependent activities. Typically, each resource may distribute its capacity among many activities, each resource is capable of processing more than one type of task to varying degrees of success, and activities may be processed by more than one resource either sequentially or simultaneously. NPDs may include precedence constraints, where sequencing, quite often in the form of simultaneity, for the beginning and ending of activities is carefully controlled while processing times and quality of services for resources are not independent. Network models for these problems are very difficult to pose since, unlike PERT, there are multiple projects, all interlinked with precedence. Consequently, a multi-dimensional assignment problem (MAP) formulation is proposed. Unfortunately, MAP data structures exhibit horrendous complexity for branch and bound when using continuous relaxations due to the very poor bound quality and cannot be solved for problems of even fairly small size. In this paper an upper bound problem is developed by exploiting a feature of the cost coefficients. This upper bound on the maximization formulation of the MAP with axial constraints preserves much of the structure of the original problem.
Keywords
New Product Development (NPD) Multi Dimensional Assignment Problem (MAP) axial constraints probability cost upper boundPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Murphey R. A., Pardalos P. M., and Pitsoulis L. (1997), “A greedy randomized adaptive search procedure for the multitarget multisensor tracking problem,” Network Design: Connectivity and Facility Location, Panos M. Pardalos and Ding-Zhu Du (eds.), DIMACS Series on Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, American Mathematical Society pp. 277–301.Google Scholar
- [2]Murphey R. A., Pardalos P. M., and Pitsoulis L. (1998), “A Parallel GRASP for The Data Association Multidimensional Assignment Problem,” Parallel Processing of Discrete Problems, P.M. Pardalos (Ed.), Volume 106 of The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications, Springer, pp. 159–179.Google Scholar
- [3]Repenning, N. (2000) “A Dynamic Model of Resource Allocation in Multi-Project Research and Development Systems,” System Dynamics Review, 16, 3: pp. 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Poore A. B. and Rijavec N. (1993), “A Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm for Multidimensional Assignment Problems arising from Multitarget Tracking,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, 3, pp. 544–563.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Poore A. B. and Rijavec N. (1994), Multidimensional Assignment Formulation of Data Association Problems Arising from Multitarget and Multisensor Tracking, Computational Optimization and Applications, 3, pp. 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Staff of Research and Education Association (1988), Handbook of Mathematical, Scientific, and Engineering Formulas, Tables, Functions, Graphs, Transforms, Research and Education Association, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
- [7]Urban, G. L. and J. R. Hauser (1993), Design and Marketing of New Products, Prentice-Hall, Second Edition.Google Scholar
- [8]Wang Y. and Perkins J. R. (2002), “Optimal resource allocation in new product development projects: a control theoretic approach,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, VOL. 47, NO. 8, pp. 1267–1276.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar