A Simulation Model for Grassland Primary Producer Phenology and Biomass Dynamic

  • Ronald H. Sauer
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 26)

Abstract

The two primary producer submodels described in this chapter, plant phenology and carbon flow, are components of the grassland ecosystem model, ELM. The objectives of these submodels are to simulate biologically realistic phenology and growth responses to conditions varying from drought to irrigation and fertilization. These submodels simulate five primary producer groups and interact extensively with each other and the other ELM submodels.

The phenology submodel simulates phenological change in each producer group. The rate of phenologic change is determined from maximum air temperature, insolation, soilwater potential, soil temperature, day length, and shoot weight.

The carbon submodel simulates dynamics of live shoots, dead shoots, live roots, seeds, and crowns for each producer group. One litter and three dead-root state variables are represented for all producers. The processes modeled for each producer group are growth, respiration, and death of shoots, roots, and crowns, gross photosynthesis, seed production and germination, and the fall of standing dead shoots.

Comparison between observed data and simulations suggest the model to be most sensitive to the belowground system, the fall of standing dead, and the relationship between phenology and environment, and that these areas need additional refinement.

Keywords

Plant Phenology Live Root Standing Dead Dead Shoot Root Death 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., Denmead, O. T.: Shortwave radiation on inclined surfaces in model plant communities. Agron. J. 61, 867–872 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asana, R. D., Saini, A. D.: Studies in physiological analysis of yield. IV. The influence of soil drought on grain development, photosynthetic surface, and water content of wheat. Physiol. Plant. 11, 666–674 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaisdell, J. P.: Seasonal development and yield of native plants on the Upper Snake River plains and their relation to certain climatic factors. USDA Tech. Bull. 1190, 1958, 68 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bokhari, U. G., Dyer, M. I.: The effects of environmental stresses on growth of blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) in environmental control growth chambers. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 227. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1973, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Botkin, D. B.: Prediction of net photosynthesis of trees from light intensity and temperature. Ecology 50, 854–858 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., Wallis, J. R.: Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60, 849–872 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridge, D. W.: A simulation model approach for relating effective climate to winter wheat yields on the great plains. Agr. Met. 17, 185–194 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridges, K. W., Wilcott, C., Westoby, M., Kirkert, R., Wilkin, D.: Nature: A guide to ecosystem modeling. Presented at Ecosystem Modeling Symposium, 1972 AIBS Meetings, Aug. 26–Sept. 1, 1972. Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1972 (mimeo.)Google Scholar
  9. Brix, H.: The effect of water stress on the rates of photosynthesis and respiration in tomato plant and loglolly pine seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 15, 10–20 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brouwer, R.: The influence of the suction tension of the nutrient solutions on growth, transpiration, and diffusion pressure deficit of bean leaves (Phaseolus vulgaris). Acta Bot. Neer. 12, 248–261 (1963); in: Plant Soil Water Relationships: A Modern Synthesis. Kramer, P. J. (ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969, 482 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Brouwer, R., de Wit, C. T.: A simulation model of plant growth with special attention to root growth and its consequences. In Proc. 15th Eastern School of Agricultural Science, Univ. Nottingham. Whittington, W. J. (ed.). London: Butterworths, 1968, pp. 224–242Google Scholar
  12. Brown, L.: Photosynthesis of two important grasses of the shortgrass prairie as affected by several ecological variables. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, 1974, 191 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Caprio, J.: The solar-thermal unit theory in relation to plant development and potential evapotranspiration. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 251. Bozeman: Montana State Univ., 1971, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, F. E., Coleman, D. C.: Secondary productivity below ground in Pawnee Grassland, 1971. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 169. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1972, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Cline, J. F., Uresk, D. W., Rickard, W. H.: Comparison of soil water used by a sagebrush-bunchgrass and cheatgrass community. J. Range Mgmt., 30, 199–202 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cline, M. G.: Effect of temperature and light intensity on growth of a shrub. Ecology 47, 782–795 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connor, D.: GROMAX: A potential productivity routine for a total grassland ecosystem model. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 208. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1973, 27 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Dahlman, R. C., Kucera, C. L.: Root productivity and turnover in native prairie. Ecology 46, 84–89. (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidson, R. L.: Effects of soil nutrients and moisture on root/shoot ratios in Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. Ann. Bot. 33, 571–577 (1969)Google Scholar
  20. de Wit, C. T.: Photosynthesis of leaf canopies. Agr. Res. Rep. No. 663. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Agr. Publ. Docu., 1965, 57 pp.Google Scholar
  21. de Wit, C. T., Brouwer, R., Penning de Vries, F. T. W.: The simulation of photosynthetic systems. In Prediction and Measurement of Photosynthetc Productivity: Proc. 1969 IBP/PP Technical Meeting. Setlik, I. (ed.). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Agr. Publ. Docu., 1970, pp. 47–70Google Scholar
  22. Dickinson, C. E., and Dodd, J. L.: Phenological pattern in the shortgrass prairie. Am. Midland Naturalist 96, 367–378 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickinson, C. T., Baker, C. V.: Pawnee Site field plant list. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 139. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1972, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Dittmer, H. J.: Clipping effects on Bermuda grass biomass. Ecology 54, 217–219 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan, W. G., Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A., Hanau, R.: A model for simulating photosynthesis in plant communities. Hilgardia 38, 181–205 (1967)Google Scholar
  26. Dye, A. J., Brown, L. F., Trlica, M. J.: Carbon dioxide exchange of blue grama as influenced by several ecological parameters, 1971. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 181. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1972, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, J. E.: A computer analysis of fawn survival in the prong-horn antelope. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. California, Davis, 1970, 70 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Heady, H. F.: Vegetational changes in the California annual type. Ecology 39, 402–416 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, M. T.: Effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology 47, 407–415 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jameson, D. A., Dyer, M. I.: Process studies workshop report. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 220. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1973, 444 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Klepper, B., Taylor, H. M., Huck, M. G., Fiscus, E. L.: 1973. Water relations and growth of cotton in drying soil. Agron. J. 65, 307–310 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klikoff, L. G.: Competitive response to moisture stress of a winter annual of the Sonoran Desert. Am. Midland Naturalist 75, 383–391 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knievel, D. P., Schmer, D. A.: Preliminary results of growth characteristics of buffalo grass, blue grama, and western wheatgrass and methodology for translocation studies using 14C as a tracer. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 86. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1971, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Knight, D. H.: Leaf area dynamics on the Pawnee Grassland, 1970–1971. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 164. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1972, 22 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Knight, D. H.: Leaf area dynamics of a shortgrass prairie in Colorado. Ecology 54, 891–896 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laycock, W. A., Buchanan, H., Krueger, W. C.: Three methods of determining diet, utilization, and trampling damage on sheep ranges. J. Range Mgmt. 25, 352–356 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lemon, E., Stewart, D. W., Shawcroft, R. W.: The sun’s work in a cornfield. Science 174, 371–378 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leopold, A. C.: Senescence in plant development. Science 134, 1727–1732 (1961)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis, H.: Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Ecology 16, 257–271 (1962)Google Scholar
  40. Lindsey, A. A., Newman, J. D.: The use of official weather data in spring time temprature analysis of an Indiana phenology record. Ecology 37, 812–823 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A.: Maximum crop productivity: An estimate. Crop Sci. 3, 67–72 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ludlow, M., Wilson, G.: Photosynthesis of tropical pasture plant. I. Illuminance, carbon dioxide concentration, leaf temperature, and leaf-air vapour pressure difference. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24, 449–470 (1971)Google Scholar
  43. Miller, P. C., Tieszen, L.: A preliminary model of processes affecting primary production in the Arctic tundra. Arctic Alpine Res. 4, 1–18 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mooney, H. A.: The carbon balance of plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 315–346 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mooney, H. A., West, M., Brayton, R.: Field measurements of the metabolic responses of bristlecone pine and big sagebrush in the White Mountains of California. Bot. Gaz. 127, 105–113 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mooney, H. A., Wright, R. D., Strain, B. P.: The gas exchange capacity of plants in relation to vegetation zonation in the White Mountains of California. Am. Midland Naturalist 72, 281–297 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mott, J. J.: Germination studies on some annual species from an arid region of western Australia. J. Ecol. 60, 293–304 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mueggler, W. F.: Plant development and yield on mountain grasslands in southwestern Montana. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Paper No. INT-124, 1972, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Murphy, C. E., Jr., Knoerr, K. R.: Modeling the energy balance processes of natural ecosystems. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Paper No. EDFB-IBP 72-10, 1972.Google Scholar
  50. Remy, T.: Fertilization and its relationship to the course of nutrient absorption by plants. Soil Sci. 48, 187–209 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robson, M. J.: The growth and development of simulated swards of perennial ryegrass. I. Leaf growth and dry weight change as related to the ceiling yield of a seeding sward. Ann. Bot. 37, 487–500 (1973)Google Scholar
  52. Rose, C. W., Begg, J. R., Byrne, G. F., Torssell, B. W. R., Goncz, J. H.: A simulation model of growth-field development relationships for Townsville stylo (Stylosanthes humilis H.B.K.) pasture. Agr. Meteorol. 10, 161–183 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenzweig, M. L.: Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: Prediction from climatological data. Am. Naturalist 102, 67–74 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sauer, R. H.: The relationship of cumulative sums and moving averages of temperature to reproductive phenology in Clarkia. Am. Midland Naturalist 95, 144–158 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sesták, Z., Catský, J., Jarvis, P.: Plant Photosynthesis Production: A Manual of Methods. The Hague, The Netherlands, 818 pp. As cited in: W. Junk, 1971, Mooney, H. A.: The carbon balance of plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 315–346 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sims, P. L., Lang’at, R. K., Hyder, D. N.: Developmental morphology of blue grama and sand blue stem. J. Range Mgmt. 26, 340–344 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sims, P. L., Singh, J. S.: Herbage dynamics and net primary production in certain ungrazed and grazed grasslands in North America. In: Preliminary Analysis of Structure and Function in Grasslands. French, N. R. (ed.). Range Sci. Depart. Sci. Ser. No. 10, 1971, pp. 59–124.Google Scholar
  58. Sims, P. L., Uresk, D. W., Bartos, D. L., Lauenroth, W. K.: Herbage dynamics on the Pawnee Site: Aboveground and belowground herbage dynamics on the four grazing intensity treatments; and preliminary sampling on the ecosystem stress site. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 99. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1971, 95 pp.Google Scholar
  59. Singh, J. S., Coleman, D. C.: Distribution of photoassimilated 14C in the root system of a shortgrass prairie. J. Ecol. 62, 359–365 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slatyer, R. O.: The significance of the permanent wilting percentage in studies of plant and soil water relationships. Bot. Rev. 23, 586–636 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Snow, D. W.: Fruiting seasons and bird breeding seasons in the New World tropics. J. Ecol. 56, 5–6 (1968)Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, H. M., Huck, M. G, Klepper, B., Lind, Z. F.: Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron. J. 2, 807–809 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Torssell, B. W. R.: Patterns and processes in the Townsville stylo-annual grass pasture ecosystem. J. Appl. Ecol. 10, 463–478 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weaver, J. E.: Classification of root systems of forbs of grassland and a consideration of their significance. Ecology 39, 393–401 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiegert, R. G., Evans, F. C.: Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation on an old field in southeastern Michigan. Ecology 45, 49–63 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, G. J., III, Markley, J. L.: The photosynthetic pathway type of North American shortgrass prairie species and some ecological implications. US/IBP Grassland Biome Tech. Rep. No. 229. Fort Collins: Colorado State Univ., 1973, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  67. Zahner, R., Stage, A. R.: A procedure for calculating daily moisture stress and its utility in regression of tree growth on weather. Ecology 47, 64–73 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald H. Sauer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations