The Policy of the Three Red Banners. The Second Five-Year Plan, 1958–1962, and the Consolidation Phase, 1963–1965

  • Willy Kraus
Chapter

Abstract

Fourteen months after Li Fu-ch’un’s detailed Report on the First Five-Year Plan for the Development of the People’s Republic of China, 1953–1957, Prime Minister Chou En-lai announced on September 16, 1956, at the Eighth Party Congress of the CCP, the second 5-year plan. The suggested plan, which was passed by the Party congress on September 27, 1956, was with respect to structure and priorities quite similar to the first 5-year plan and its capital-intensive industrial buildup. The influence of the Soviet development pattern remained. The construction performance of the “great Soviet Union,” whose aid continued to form the base for China’s development, was specifically praised. The Party Congress authorized the State Council to set up a provisional plan without delay. It was demanded specifically that all quantitative targets be determined according to a solid basis. The socialist enthusiasm of the masses should of course not be ignored, but all negative conditions and difficulties that could turn up should also be considered. Rash and adventurist tendencies had to be fought as well as tendencies to depart from concrete reality; it was wrong to overlook possible alternatives or to disregard the planned and well-proportioned development in the different economic sectors.1

Keywords

Central Government Foreign Trade Plan Period Central Committee Chinese Leadership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note

  1. 1.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 48, 68.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cf. MacFarquhar 1958, p. 323ff.; Schurmann 1968, p. 201; Domes 1972, p. 86; Zagoria 1964, p. 87.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 16; Liu Shao-ch’i 1969, p. 460.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 78; Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 348f., 416, 426f. Cf. also Gray 1972, p. 501: “If one had to sum up in a single phrase the impression which the Ten Great Relationships makes upon the reader, as far as its economic content is concerned, one might say that Mao rejects simple static, arithmetical, either/or views of the economy, and perceives that economic relationship both sectoral and geographical are sufficiently complex to demand a) simultaneous development through b) the encouragement of local initiative c) in market conditions which preserve a sufficiently high level of material incentives even if these d) operate mainly through enterprises and collectives rather than through individuals.”Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 77ff. It has often been asked whether the policy of the Three Red Banners had not replaced the projected second 5-year plan and whether the second 5-year plan had ever achieved real importance. For example, Choh-Ming Li 1964b, p. 12, made the point that “There has never been a Second Five-Year Plan in any real sense of the term.” On the other hand, Chou En-lai, on August 26, 1959, emphasized that the second 5-year plan would, on the whole, be fulfilled within two years, and laid stress on its relationship with the Great Leap: “The second five-year plan will without doubt be a five-year plan of the great leap forward.” Communist China 1955–1959, p. 541. Cf. also ibid., pp. 548, 454ff.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 175, 190; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 149ff. Cf. Choh-Ming Li 1964b, p. 9f.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ChouEn-lai 1971, p. 536.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 48; Jerome Ch’en 1975, pp. 73ff., 91.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theodore Hsi-en Chen 1974, p. 278; Fraser 1969, p. 554ff.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 555; Harper 1969, p. 266.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 79; Suttmeier 1975, pp. 215, 219f.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 527.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibid., Vol. 1, pp. 524ff., 617.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 437f.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cited according to Ost-Probleme, Vol. 12 (1960), p. 314; JMJP, July 5 and Oct. 14, 1957; KMJP, May 9, 1958; Ronald Hsia 1961, p. 61; Ma Yin-ch’u 1958, p. 142ff.; K. R. Walker 1963, p. 113ff.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morrison/Salmon 1973, p. 873ff.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schurmann 1967, p. 117ff.; 1968, p. 175f.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 79, 117; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 343ff.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cf. Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 47ff., 65f.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cf. Grossmann 1960, p. 91; Chao Kuo-chün 1959–1960, Vol. 1, p. 41f.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibid., p. 44ff.; Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 182, 231f.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 55, 500f.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 183f., 233, 372.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., pp. 177, 179, 183, 241.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibid., pp. 178, 515; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 57ff.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 178, 210, 232, 428; Yuan-li Wu 1967, p. 164; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 162.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Craig 1975, p. 290ff.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cited according to Schräm 1974, p. 92.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 151, 689.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cited according to Ost-Probleme, Vol. 10 (1958), p. 715.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cf. Fraser 1969, p. 554ff.; Eitner 1964, p. 15f.; David Kan 1971, p. 34.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eitner 1964, pp. 15, 17f.; Barendsen 1960, pp. 57, 59.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Suttmeier 1975, p. 218; Lindbeck 1961, p. 119; Orleans 1967, pp. 563, 568. Kuo Mo-jo, president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Li Szu-kuang, director of the “Society for Science and Technology,” only had a voice in the “Scientific Planning Commission.”Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ost-Probleme, Vol. 10 (1958), p. 719; Seyboldt 1973, pp. 36, 40; R. Hoffmann 1972, p. 58, Shirk 1973, p. 545; Eitner 1964, p. 21.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cited according to Doolin 1963, p. 7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shirk 1973, p. 515; Jan 1969, p. 140.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    David Kan 1971, p. 35; Eitner 1964, p. 20.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Hoffman 1972, p. 47.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 125, 525f.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rifkin 1973, p. 147.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schram 1974, p. 86; Rifkin 1973, p. 145; Tao-tai Hsia 1973, pp. 123f., 135f.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    See ibid., p. 134; Rifkin 1973, p. 147f.; Croizier 1965, pp. 13f., 22.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Howe 1971, p. 141; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 549.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aird 1972, pp. 247, 275f., 291, 293; Orleans 1973, p. 202; Snow 1970, p. 401; Pi-chao Chen 1973, p. 247.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ibid., p. 241; Ost-Probleme, Vol. 14 (1962), p. 733f.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aird 1972, p. 299f.; Snow 1970, p. 400.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chao Kuo-chün 1959–1960, Vol. 1, p. 104ff.; Donnithorne 1967, p. 518ff.; Jen-min shou-ts’e 1958, p. 328; 1959, p. 260; 1960, p. 279.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. Hoffmann 1972, p. 19f.; Schurmann 1968, p. 192.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ibid., p. 488.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Salaff 1967, p. 88f.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 127, 130, 133, 142. Cf. also Schurmann 1968, p. 389.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 177f.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    The Case of Peng Teh-huai; Machetzki 1973, p. 38; Glaubitz 1969, p. 187ff.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    PRe, 1967, No. 34 (Aug. 18), p. 18ff. This document of August 16, 1959, was not published until 8 years later and then not in its entirety. See also JMJP, Aug. 16, 1967; Martin 1974, p. 136ff.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cited according to von Groeling 1971, p. 43f.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cf. for example Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 735, 744ff.; Machetzki 1973, p. 82; Baum/Teiwes 1968a, p. 47f.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Machetzki 1973, p. 82f.; Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 755, 784.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ibid., pp. 787, 798; Machetzki 1973, p. 89f.; Domes 1972, p. 132.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Baum/Teiwes 1968a, pp. 43ff., 118; Machetzki 1973, p. 91f.; Domes 1972, p. 124ff.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Borissow/Koloskow 1973, p. 137ff.; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. III, p. 287; Müller/Gross 1959, p. 81ff.; Hughes/Luard 1961, p. 81; Klinkmüller/Ruban 1960, p. 251; Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, pp. 11, 29; Zagoria 1964, p. 150.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Glaubitz 1973, pp. 24, 27; Hamm/Kun 1963; Ost-Probleme, Vol. 15 (1963), p. 709; Vol. 16 (1964), p. 281ff.; Brahm 1966, p. 147f.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 475; Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 14.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brahm 1966, p. 101.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ost-Probleme, Vol. 16 (1964), p. 281f.; Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 6; Borissow/Koloskow 1973, pp. 243f., 247.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 23.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Feng-Hwa Mah 1972, p. 164f.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ibid., p. 165f.; Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 39f.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    According to Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 41, hundreds of thousands of skilled workers were trained by Soviet personnel.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Brahm 1966, p. 98; Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, pp. 39, 92; Vladimirov 1969, p. 9.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chu-yuan Cheng 1964, p. 47, states that 130 projects were completed by 1960; cf. also Chen/ Galenson 1969, p. 52. In contrast, the Soviets spoke of 198 projects (Pravda, Feb. 14, 1963), or “about 200” large industrial plants, factory buildings and other objects which had been built and equipped in a short time with Soviet aid (Ost-Probleme, Vol. 16 (1964), p. 281). Cf. also ibid., p. 295; Borissow/Koloskow 1973, p. 170f.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 451ff; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 300. Cf. Domes 1972, p. 99; Ching-chi yen-chiu, 1959, No. 11 (Nov.), p. 34; Donnithorne 1967, p. 48.Google Scholar
  72. 74.
    Snow 1970, p. 421.Google Scholar
  73. 75.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 543; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 123ff.Google Scholar
  74. 76.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 543f. Cf. also Snow 1970, p. 424.Google Scholar
  75. 77.
    Cf. Documents, Vol. 1, p. 695ff.Google Scholar
  76. 78.
    Domes 1972, p. 115; Crook 1975, p. 373ff.Google Scholar
  77. 79.
    Shih Ch’eng-chih 1962, p. 34f.; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 125; Salaff 1967, p. 87.Google Scholar
  78. 80.
    Shih Ch’eng-chih 1962, pp. 32ff., 108; Ost-Probleme, Vol. 12 (1960), p. 297; Donnithorne 1967, p. 228.Google Scholar
  79. 81.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 559f.Google Scholar
  80. 82.
    Jen-min shou-ts’e, 1957, p. 310f.; 1958, p. 327f.; 1959, p. 260; Schurmann 1968, p. 182; Chin Ti 1959, p. 23; Donnithorne 1967, p. 520f.Google Scholar
  81. 83.
    Cited according to Donnithorne 1967, p. 460f.Google Scholar
  82. 84.
    Jen-min shou-ts’e, 1961, p. 60; 1962, p. 50; 1964, p. 275; Donnithorne 1967, pp. 522f., 527f.; Schurmann 1968, p. 304.Google Scholar
  83. 85.
    Richmann 1969, p. 690ff.Google Scholar
  84. 86.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 294; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 619ff.Google Scholar
  85. 87.
    Donnithorne 1967, pp. 299, 303; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 647ff.Google Scholar
  86. 88.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 298f.Google Scholar
  87. 89.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 591; Schräm 1974, p. 71; Donnithorne 1967, p. 461.Google Scholar
  88. 90.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 591f., 595.Google Scholar
  89. 91.
    Ibid., pp. 592f., 601f.Google Scholar
  90. 92.
    Donnithorne 1964, p. 115.Google Scholar
  91. 93.
    Chang Tsungtung 1965, p. 155; Donnithorne 1967, p. 464.Google Scholar
  92. 94.
    Bettelheim 1974, pp. 16f., 81f.; Andors 1974, p. 444ff.; Kosta/Meyer 1976, p. 180; Münzel 1971, pp. 116, 125.Google Scholar
  93. 95.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 166; Ching-chi yen-chiu, 1963, No. 12 (Dec), p. 40ff.; 1965, No. 1 (Jan.), p. 10ff.Google Scholar
  94. 96.
    Richman 1969, p. 315; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 164; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 691; Donnithorne 1967, p. 210.Google Scholar
  95. 97.
    Donnithorne 1972, p. 11.Google Scholar
  96. 98.
    Fu Tung Chen 1969, pp. 71f., 108; Donnithorne 1972, pp. 3f., 11; Donnithorne 1967, p. 397; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 621.Google Scholar
  97. 99.
    Ibid.; Taxation in Communist China 1950–59, p. 2ff.; Ecklund 1966, pp. 52, 106.Google Scholar
  98. 100.
    Ibid., p. 67ff.; Nai-Ruenn Chen 1967, p. 95; Donnithorne 1967, p. 375.Google Scholar
  99. 101.
    State Statistical Bureau 1960, p. 55ff.Google Scholar
  100. 102.
    Hollister 1967, p. 125; Wu/Hoeber/Rockwell 1963, p. 340, Table 80. According to this, the investment quotient rose from 28.8% in 1958 to 35.9% in 1959, and to 43.7% in 1960.Google Scholar
  101. 103.
    Hollister 1964, p. 41.Google Scholar
  102. 104.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 175, 689ff., especially points 3, 4, 9, 32. Cf. also Choh-Ming Li 1964b, p. 11.Google Scholar
  103. 105.
    State Statistical Bureau 1960, p. 59; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, pp. 153, 158; Chao Kuo-chun 1960, p. 149; Hollister 1964, pp. 43, 128.Google Scholar
  104. 106.
    Grossmann 1960, p. 153.Google Scholar
  105. 107.
    Simonis 1968, p. 123ff.; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 228.Google Scholar
  106. 108.
    Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 144; Riskin 1971, p. 257.Google Scholar
  107. 109.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 593; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 135; Yuan-li Wu 1965b, p. 223; Riskin 1971, p. 259; Ishikawa 1962, p. 43; Simonis 1968, p. 129ff.Google Scholar
  108. 110.
    Yuan-li Wu 1965b, pp. 47f., 118; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 145; Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 17, 594.Google Scholar
  109. 111.
    Ibid., p. 589; Kang Chao 1974, p. 83.Google Scholar
  110. 112.
    Yuan-li Wu 1965b, p. 285; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 589.Google Scholar
  111. 113.
    Liu/Yeh 1965, p. 119; Field 1975, p. 149; Ashbrook 1978, p. 231; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 591.Google Scholar
  112. 114.
    Ibid., p. 545ff.; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 48.Google Scholar
  113. 115.
    Donnithorne 1967, pp. 59, 167; Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 607, 701; Yuan-li Wu 1965b, p. 89; Ishikawa 1962, p. 43; Richman 1969, pp. 690ff., 49.Google Scholar
  114. 116.
    Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 546, 485, 496; State Statistical Bureau 1960, p. 128; Eris-man 1972, p. 122f.; Kang Chao 1970, p. 134f.; Rochlin/Hagemann 1971, p. 144.Google Scholar
  115. 117.
    Kang Chao 1970, pp. 149ff., 310; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 157; Chao Kuo-chun 1960, p. 186f.; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 509; Field 1975, p. 166.Google Scholar
  116. 118.
    Cf. Larsen 1967, p. 228; Kang Chao 1970, pp. 87f., 173, 169; State Statistical Bureau 1960, p. 131; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 509; Chao Kuo-chun 1960, pp. 174, 194; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 523ff.Google Scholar
  117. 119.
    Ibid., pp. 518, 522; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 158; Chao Kuo-chun 1960, p. 177ff.; Kang Chao 1970, p. 132.Google Scholar
  118. 120.
    Erisman 1972, pp. 125f., 129; Chao Kuo-chun 1960, p. 178; Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 423f., 509, 547, 552; Kang Chao 1970, pp. 121, 128ff., 137.Google Scholar
  119. 121.
    Ibid., pp. 188, 254f., 101, 107; Cf. the differing figures in Rochlin/Hagemann 1971, p. 160.Google Scholar
  120. 122.
    Communist China 1955–1959, pp. 458f., 424, 498, 538, 546.Google Scholar
  121. 123.
    Ibid., p. 552.Google Scholar
  122. 124.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 174f., 193ff., 685ff.; CQ, No. 18 (Apr.-June 1964), p. 230f.; Donnithorne 1967, pp. 408f., 522f.Google Scholar
  123. 125.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 554ff., 610; Rochlin/Hagemann 1971, pp. 89, 93.Google Scholar
  124. 126.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 609ff.; Communist China 1963, Vol. I, p. 52f.; Donnithorne 1967, p. 360. Schran 1969, p. 149, shows an increase of the index (1952 = 100) from 115.2 in 1957 to 116.5 in 1958, and to 119.1 in 1959.Google Scholar
  125. 127.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 685ff., 739, 745, 774f.; Ost-Probleme, Vol. 14 (1962), p. 707; Communist China 1963, Vol. I, p. 43f.; 1965, Vol. II, p. 83.Google Scholar
  126. 128.
    Documents, Vol. 1, pp. 648ff., 689; Communist China 1963, Vol. I, p. 46ff.Google Scholar
  127. 129.
    R. L. Price 1967, p. 601; Nai-Ruenn Chen 1975, p. 648; Williams 1975, p. 232.Google Scholar
  128. 130.
    Cf. the list of these projects in R. L. Price 1967, p. 603.Google Scholar
  129. 131.
    Lippit 1966, pp. 102, 117; Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 162; Vetterling/Wagy 1972, p. 153f.; Shabad 1972, p. 95; The Times Atlas of China 1974, p. xxviii.Google Scholar
  130. 132.
    Vetterling/Wagy 1972, p. 160.Google Scholar
  131. 133.
    Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 162.Google Scholar
  132. 134.
    Vetterling/Wagy 1972, p. 170; FEER, 1966 Yearbook, p. 137; Richman 1969, p. 577. Excepted are airplanes of the following types: Antonov-2, Antonov-12, Aero 45, Capital 1, Yakovlev 12, Red Flag and Flying Dragon.Google Scholar
  133. 135.
    Vetterling/Wagy 1972, p. 167; Lippit 1966, p. 110f.Google Scholar
  134. 136.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 70; Craig 1975, p. 292.Google Scholar
  135. 137.
    Chu-yuan Cheng 1967a, p. 52Iff.Google Scholar
  136. 138.
    Cited according to R. Hoffmann 1972, p. 145f.Google Scholar
  137. 139.
    R. Hoffman 1972, p. 58; Shirk 1973, p. 511; Fraser 1969, p. 195.Google Scholar
  138. 140.
    Lampton 1974a, pp. 668, 670, 676f.Google Scholar
  139. 141.
    Aird 1972, pp. 273ff., 302; Snow 1970, p. 398ff.Google Scholar
  140. 142.
    Jones 1972, p. 54; Domes 1972, p. 122; Martin 1974, p. 150ff.; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 193ff.Google Scholar
  141. 143.
    Schräm 1974, p. 201; Documents, Vol. 1, p. 834.Google Scholar
  142. 144.
    Domes 1972, pp. 99, 105.Google Scholar
  143. 145.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 546.Google Scholar
  144. 146.
    Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, pp. 178, 188; Communist China 1955–1959, p. 545.Google Scholar
  145. 147.
    Documents, Vol. 1, p. 686; Communist China 1963, Vol. I, p. 51.Google Scholar
  146. 148.
    Kirby 1956–1968, Vol. IV, p. 189; FEER, Vol. XXVIII (Jan.-June 1960), p. 935; Donnithorne 1967, p. 311.Google Scholar
  147. 149.
    Skinner 1964/65, p. 376; Communist China 1965, Vol. II, p. 87.Google Scholar
  148. 150.
    Shabad 1972, p. 97f.; Vetterling/Wagy 1972, pp. 156, 178.Google Scholar
  149. 151.
    Lippit 1966, p. 115. Cf. also Yuan-li Wu 1967, p. 181ff.Google Scholar
  150. 152.
    Ibid., p. 163; Lippit 1966, p. 117f.Google Scholar
  151. 153.
    Richman 1969, p. 577; Lippit 1966, p. 119.Google Scholar
  152. 154.
    Craig 1975, pp. 290, 292; Communist China 1964, Vol. I, p. 17.Google Scholar
  153. 155.
    Donnithorne 1967, p. 460.Google Scholar
  154. 156.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 506ff.Google Scholar
  155. 157.
    Cited according to R. Hoffmann 1972, p. 28.Google Scholar
  156. 158.
    R. Hoffmann 1972, p. 21; Crook/Crook 1966, p. 93; Alsop 1962, pp. 21–37; Barnett 1967b, p. 16ff.; Domes 1972, p. 111; Perkins 1971, p. 6.Google Scholar
  157. 159.
    Communist China 1955–1959, p. 548f.Google Scholar
  158. 160.
    Ibid., p. 136ff.Google Scholar
  159. 161.
    Von Groeling 1971, p. 45. Von Groeling has attempted here to reconstruct Liu Shao-ch’i’s basic statements, using material stemming from the Cultural Revolution.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willy Kraus
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Ostasienwissenschaften, Sektion Wirtschaft OstasiensRuhr-University BochumBochum 1Germany

Personalised recommendations