Abstract
As we have seen in the preceding lectures, it is a fundamental premiss of rational thermodynamics that the constitutive relations must be such that allsmooth thermokinetic processes satisfy identically the Clausius-Duhem inequality. However, since processes are to be determined as solutions to systems of nonlinear evolution equations generated by the balance laws of mass, momentum and energy, their smoothness cannot be taken for granted.
Keywords
Rational Mechanics Rational Thermodynamic Proper Process Fading Memory Discontinuous Process
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]C. M. Dafermos, “The entropy rate admissibility criterion for solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws”,Journal of Differetial Equations 14 (1973): 202–212.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]CM. Dafermos, “The entropy rate admissibility criterion in thermoelasticity”,Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (8) 57 (1974): 113–119.Google Scholar
- [3]CM. Dafermos, “Generalized characteristic and the structure of solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws”,Indiana University Mathematics Journal 26 (1977): 1097–1119.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]C. M. Dafermos, “The second law of thermodynamics and stability”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 70 (1979): 167–197.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]C. M. Dafermos, “Stability of motions of thermoelastic fluids”,Journal of Thermal Stresses 2 (1979): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]CM. Dafermos, “Global smooth solutions to the initial-boundary value problem for the equations of one-dimensional nonlinear thermoviscoelasticity”, SIAMJournal of Mathematical Analysis 13 (1982): 397–408.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]CM. Dafermos, “Hyperbolic balance laws”, inSystems of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations . Edited by JM. Ball, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1983.Google Scholar
- [8]C. M. Dafermos & L. Hsiao, “Global smooth thermomechanical processes in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoviscoelasticity”,Journal of Nonlinear Analysis 6 (1982): 435–454.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]C. M. Dafermos & J. A. Nohel, “Energy methods for a class of nonlinear hyperbolic Volterra equations”, Communications in Partial Differential Equations 4 (1979): 219–278.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]C. M. Dafermos & J. A. Nohel, “A nonlinear hyperbolic Volterra equation in viscoelasticity”,American Journal of Mathematics (1981): 87–116 (supplement dedicated to P. Hartman).Google Scholar
- [11]R. J. Diperna, “Singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 60 (1975): 75–100.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]R. J. Diperna, “Uniqueness of solutions to hyperbolic conservation laws”,Indiana University Mathematics Journal 28 (1979): 137–188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]R. Hagan & M. Slemrod, “The viscosity-capillarity admissibility criterion for shocks and phase transitions”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 83 (1983): 333–361.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]W. J. Hrusa, “A nonlinear functional differential equation in Banach space with applications to materials with fading memory”.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 84 (1984): 99–137.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]L. Hsiao, “The entropy rate admissibility criterion in gas dynamics”,J. Differential Equations 38 (1980): 226–238.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]A. M. Kazhikov & V. V. Shelukhin, “Unique global solution with respect to the time of initial-boundary value problems for one-dimensional equations of a viscous gas”,Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 41 (1977): 273–282.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]W. Kosinski, “On weak solutions, stability and uniqueness in dynamics of dissipative bodies”,Archives of Mechanics 33 (1981): 319–323.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [18]PD. Lax, “Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. II”,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 10 (1957): 537–566.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]T-P. Liu, “The entropy condition and the admissibility of shocks”,Journal of Mathematical Analysis and its Applications 53 (1976): 78–88.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]T.-P. Liu, “Admissible solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws”,Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 30, No. 240 (1981).Google Scholar
- [21]R. C. MacCamy, “A model for one-dimensional, nonlinear viscoelasticity”, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 35 (1977): 21–33.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- [22]R. Malek-Madani, “Energy criteria for finite hyperelasticity”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 77 (1981): 177–188.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]A. Matsumura & T. Nishida, “The initial value problem for the equations of motion of viscous and heat-conductive gases”,Journal of Mathematics of Kyoto University 20 (1980): 67–104.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- [24]OA. Oleinik, “Uniqueness and stability of the generalized solution of the Cauchy problem for a quasilinear equation”,Uspekhii Matematicheskii Nauk (N.S) 14 (1959): 165–170.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [25]M. Slemrod, “Global existence, uniqueness and asymptotic stability of classical smooth solutions in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 76 (1981): 97–133.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]J. W. Strutt (LORD RAYLEIGH), “Aerial plane waves of finite amplitude”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) A 84 (1910): 247–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [27]C. Truesdell & R. Toupin, “The classical fiels theories”, in Flügge’sHandbuch der Physik Volume III/1, Berlin etc., Springer-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
- [28]AI. Volpert, “The space BV and quasilinear equations”,Mathemaics in USSR—Sbornik 2 (1967): 225–267.Google Scholar
- [29]B. Wendroff, “The Riemann problem for materials with nonconvex equations of state”,Journal of Mathematical Analysis and its Applications 38 (1972): 454–466.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1984