Data pp 333-338 | Cite as

The Garrison Bay Project, Stock Assessment and Dynamics of the Littleneck Clam, Protothaca staminea

  • D. F. Andrews
  • A. M. Herzberg
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS)


Garrison Bay is a small bay in Washington State, U.S.A. The marine fauna is diversified, with especially large numbers of soft-substrate benthic organisms such as polychaetes and bivalves (Scherba and Gallucci, 1976). One of the popular recreational activities in the bay is clam digging. During the past five years this harvest has been monitored and data collected on the species harvested, the total weight of each digger’s harvest, the size distribution of each species and the time needed to dig each catch. In addition, a periodic survey by stratified random sampling determines the abundance and size distributions of the unharvested standing stock of each species. These latter sampling data are presented for the littleneck clam, Protothaca staminea, the species most commonly taken.


Stratify Random Sampling Stock Assessment Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Intertidal Environment Stratify Random Sampling Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernard, D. R. (1981). Multivariate analysis as a means of comparing growth in fish. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elliott, J.M. (1971). Some methods for the statisticall analysis of samples benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Boilogical association, Scientific Publication no. 25.Google Scholar
  3. Gallucci, V.F. and Quinn, T. II (1979). Reparameterizing, fitting and testing a simple growth model. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 108, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hylleberg, J. and Gallucci, V. (1975). Selectivity in feeding by the deposit-feeding bivalve. Macoma nasuta. Mar. Biol. 32, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jumars, P., Thistle, D. and Jones, M.L. (1977). Detecting two-dimensional spatial structure in biological data. Oecologia 28, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kimura D.K. (1977). Statistical assessment of the age-length key. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scherba, S. and Gallucci, V.F. (1976). The application of systematic sampling to a study of infaunal variation in a soft substrate intertidal environment. Fishery Bulletin 74, 937–948.Google Scholar
  8. Westrheim, S.J. and Ricker, W.E. (1978). Bias in using an age-length key to estimate age-frequency distributions. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. F. Andrews
    • 1
  • A. M. Herzberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsImperial College of Science and TechnologyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations