Contraceptive Practice in the Context of a Nonrestrictive Abortion Law: Age-Specific Pregnancy Rates in New York City, 1971–1973

  • Sara L. Tietze
  • Richard Lincoln
Chapter

Abstract

On July 1, 1970—1/2 years before the Supreme Court’s 1973 abortion decisions—the nation’s most liberal state abortion law took effect in New York State. The New York law permits termination of pregnancy by a doctor at the woman’s request during the first 24 weeks of gestation. In New York City, this law was implemented by the public and private medical services in a nonrestrictive manner, so that legal abortion has been made widely available and accessible to Online socioeconomic and ethnic segments of the metropolitan population. In an earlier report,l we tried to establish that about 70% of the legal abortions obtained by New York City residents during the first 2 years under the liberalized abortion law replaced illegal abortions, while 30% replaced unintended births.

Keywords

Pregnancy Rate York City Contraceptive Practice Fiscal Year Legal Abortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tietze C. Two years’ experience with a liberal abortion law: its impact on fertility trends in New York City. Family Planning Perspectives 1973;5:36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wynn M, Wynn A. Some Consequences of Induced Abortion to Children Bom Subsequently. London: Foundation for Education and Research in Child-Bearing, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine. Legalized Abortion and the Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1975, pp. 54–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogue CJ. Low birth weight subsequent to induced abortion: a historical prospective study of 948 women in Skopje, Yugoslavia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 123:675–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tietze C. 1973, op. cit., p. 41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    New York City Department of Health. Bulletin of Abortion Program, June 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid.; and Pakter J, O’Hare D, Nelson F, Svigir M. Two years’ experience in New York City with the liberalized abortion law-progress and problems. Am J Public Health 1973;63:524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    New York State Department of Health. Report of Selected Characteristics of Induced Abortions Recorded in New York State January-December 1971, Albany, NY, August 1972, Table 6; and Report of Selected Characteristics of Induced Terminations of Pregnancy Recorded in New York State January-December 1972, Albany, NY, January 1974, Table 6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control, DHEW. Abortion Surveillance, Annual Summary 1973, Atlanta: DHEW Publication No. (CDC) 75–8205, 1975, p. 13, Table 5.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pakter J. A review of three years’ experience with legalized abortions in New York City (from inception to six months after the Supreme Court decision). Advances in Planned Parenthood 1974;9(2):8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Board of Health and Welfare of Sweden. Unpublished tabulation of legal abortions, 1968–1973.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Center for Health Statistics, DHEW. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1971–1973, Vol. I, Natality (3 vols.). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1976, Table 2–1.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    New York City Department of Health. Summary of Vital Statistics 1971, 1971, Table 10; and unpublished data for 1972 and 1973.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tietze C, Murstein M. Induced abortion: a factbook. Reports on Population/Family Planning, No. 14, 2nd ed. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nortman D. Parental age as a factor in pregnancy outcome and child development. Reports on Population/Family Planning, August 1974, No. 16, Table 2, p. 16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    US Bureau of the Census. Estimates of the population of metropolitan areas, 1972 and 1973, and components of change, since 1970. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 537, GPO, December 1974.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    US Bureau of the Census. Components of population change by country: 1960 to 1970. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 461, GPO, June 28, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Tietze C. 1973, op. cit., p. 41.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tietze C, Bongaarts J. Fertility rates and abortion rates: simulations of family limitation. Studies in Family Planning 1975;6:114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kantner JF, Zelnik M. Contraception and pregnancy: experience of young unmarried women in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 1973;5:21; Table 1, p. 22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah F, Zelnik M, Kantner JF. Unprotected intercourse among unwed teenagers. Family Planning Perspectives 1974;7:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zelnik M, Kantner JF. Sexuality, contraception and pregnancy among young unwed females in the United States. In: Westoff CF, Parke R Jr, eds. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth, Vol. 1 of Commission Research Reports, Washington, DC: GPO, 1972, Table 1, p. 360.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tietze C. 1973, op. cit., Tables 1 and 4, pp. 37 and 38;Google Scholar
  24. Tietze C, Dawson DA. Induced abortion: a factbook. Reports on Population/Family Planning, No. 14, December 1973, Tables 1, 5, 6, 8, pp. 8, 19, 20, 24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah L. Tietze 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara L. Tietze
    • 1
  • Richard Lincoln
    • 2
  1. 1.New YorkUSA
  2. 2.The Alan Guttmacher InstituteNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations