Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind

  • Daniel M. Wegner
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)


The most influential theory of group behavior that has ever been developed is currently in disfavor. This is the theory of the group mind. Social commentators once found it very useful to analyze the behavior of groups by the same expedient used in analyzing the behavior of individuals. The group, like the person, was assumed to be sentient, to have a form of mental activity that guides action. Rousseau (1767) and Hegel (1807) were the early architects of this form of analysis, and it became so widely used in the 19th and early 20th centuries that almost every early social theorist we now recognize as a contributor to modern social psychology held a similar view. McDougall, Ross, Durkheim, Wundt, and LeBon, to name just a few, were willing to assume that the group has a mental life that plays a part in the patterning of group behavior.


Memory System Memory Item Internal Storage Transactive Memory Individual Memory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, J., & Reder, L. (1979). Elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385–403). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Archer, R. L. (1980). Self-disclosure. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.), The self in social psychology (pp. 183–205). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson, J., & Huston, T. (1984). Sex role orientation and division of labor early in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop, G. D., Sikes, L., Schroeder, D., McGregor, U. K., & Holub, D. (1985, August). Behavior in response to physical symptoms. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colligan, M. J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Murphy, L. (Eds). (1982). Mass psychogenic illness. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision making within the household. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giuliano, T., & Wegner, D. M. (1985). [The operation of transactive memory in intimate couples]. Unpublished research data.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris, J. E. (1978). External memory aids. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 172–180). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes-Roth, B., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hegel, P. T. (1807/1910). The phenomenology of mind (Transl.). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopper, R., Knapp, M. L., & Scott, L. (1981). Couple’s personal idioms: Exploring intimate talk. Journal of Communication, 31, 23–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janis, I. (1983). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung, C. G. (1922). Collected papers on analytical psychology (2nd ed.). London: Bailliere, Tindall, and Cox.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed (pp. 327–336). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society. New York: Harcourt-Brace.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pennebaker, J. W. (1982). The psychology of physical symptoms. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rousseau, J. J. (1767). A treatise on the social contract. London: Beckett and DeHondt.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sackett, D. L., & Snow, J. C. (1979). The magnitude of compliance and noncompliance. In R. B. Haynes, D. W. Taylor, & D. L. Sackett (Eds.), Compliance in health care (pp. 11–22). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wood, D. J. (1980). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language, and thought. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 280–296). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel M. Wegner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations