A Simulation Model of the Interactions Among Nutrients, Phytoplankton, and Zooplankton in Lake Mendota

  • Michael J. Vanni
  • Stephen R. Carpenter
  • Chris Luecke
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


Freshwater plankton communities are regulated by a variety of factors, among which nutrients and predators are two of the most important. Increases in limiting nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen can stimulate production and biomass of phytoplankton (Schindler 1978), which in turn can stimulate production and biomass of herbivorous zooplankton. Predators such as fish can influence plankton communities through selective predation on large zooplankton species (Zaret 1980; Northcote 1988). Because large zooplankton species have relatively high grazing rates (per individual) on phytoplankton and graze on a wider range of food particles (Burns 1969), size-selective predation on large zooplankton can also have a substantial influence on phytoplankton (Carpenter and Kitchell 1988; Vanni et al. 1990a).


Phytoplankton Biomass Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Fish Predation Grazing Rate Planktivorous Fish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benndorf J, Schultz H, Benndorf A, Unger R, Penz E, Kneschke H, Kossatz K, Dumke R, Hornig U, Kruspe R, Reichel R (1988) Food-web manipulation by enhancement of piscivorous fish stocks: Long-term effects in the Bautzen reservoir. Limnologica 19:97–110Google Scholar
  2. Brock TD (1985) A Eutrophic lake: Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns CW (1969) The relationship between body size of filter-feeding Cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13:675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1984) Plankton community structure and limnetic primary production. Am. Nat. 124:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1987) The temporal scale of variance in limnetic primary production. Am. Nat. 129:417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1988) Consumer control of lake productivity. BioScience 35:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gliwicz ZM, Lampert W (1990) Food thresholds in Daphnia species in the absence and presence of blue-green filaments. Ecology 71:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldman JC, McCarthy JJ, Peavey DG (1979) Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature 279:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lathrop RC (1990) Response of Lake Mendota (Wisconsin, USA) to decreased phosphorus loadings and the effect on downstream lakes. Verh. Internal. Ver. Theoret. Angew. Limnol. 24:457–463Google Scholar
  10. Lehman JT (1980) Nutrient recycling as an interface between algae and grazers in freshwater communities. In Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of freshwater zooplankton communities, University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, pp 251–263Google Scholar
  11. Luecke C, Vanni MJ, Magnuson JJ, Kitchell JF, Jacobson PT (1990) Seasonal regulation of Daphnia populations by planktivorous fish: Implications for the spring clear-water phase. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:1718–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Muck P, Lampert W (1984) An experimental study on the importance of food conditions for the relative abundance of calanoid copepods and cladocerans. Arch. Hydrobiol. (Suppl. 66) 2: 157–179Google Scholar
  13. Northcote TG (1988) Fish in the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems: A “top-down” view. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peters RH, Downing JA (1984) Empirical analysis of zooplankton filtering and feeding rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29:763–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Porter KG, Gerritsen J, Orcutt JD (1982) The effect of food concentration on swimming patterns, feeding behavior, ingestion, assimilation, and respiration by Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27:935–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reynolds CS (1984) The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Scavia D, Lang GA, Kitchell JF (1988) Dynamics of Lake Michigan plankton: A model evaluation of nutrient loading, competition, and predation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schindler DW (1978) Factors regulating phytoplankton production and standing crop in the world’s lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stauffer RE (1987) Vertical nutrient transport and its effects on epilimnetic phosphorus in four calcareous lakes. Hydrobiologia 154:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vanderploeg HA, Scavia D (1979) Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of zooplankton grazing. Ecol Model. 7:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vanderploeg HA, Scavia D, Liebig JR (1984) Feeding rate of Diaptomus sicilis and its relation to selectivity and effective food concentration in algal mixtures and in Lake Michigan. J. Plankton Res. 6:919–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vanni MJ, Luecke C, Kitchell JF, Allen Y, Temte J, Magnuson JJ (1990a) Effects on lower trophic levels of massive fish mortality. Nature 344:333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vanni MJ, Luecke C, Kitchell JF, Magnuson JJ (1990b) Effects of planktivorous fish mass mortality on the plankton community of Lake Mendota, Wisconsin: Implications for biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia 200/201:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vanni MJ, Temte J (1990) Seasonal patterns of grazing and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a eutrophic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:697–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Vanni
  • Stephen R. Carpenter
  • Chris Luecke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations