Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology pp 117-126 | Cite as
Predicational Versus Mediational Theorizing in Psychology
Summary
Mediational theorizing focuses on mediate or interdependent considerations in a line of action, and can be construed in completely mechanistic terms as when we describe the actions of a lever or a thermostat. Predicational theorizing focuses on the immediate organization of meanings in relation to each other and cannot be understood mechanistically. Mediational theorizing is said to occur in the midst of a left-to-right flow of influence, whereas predicational theorizing is said to occur from a broader to a narrower extension of meaning. Predications can therefore be thought of in either a top-down or a right-to-left alignment as well as the left-to-right direction of meaning extension. It is argued that psychologists are willing to take a predicational view of their own behavior as theoreticians and scientists, but that they describe the human beings they study in terms of a mediational formulation. Historical reasons for this state of affairs are presented. It is also shown how mediational theorizing is flawed, requiring informal ‘homuncular’ theories to enter into the presentation. The presentation closes with a request that psychologists make themselves the measure of their subject matter, and that therefore more predicational theorizing be attempted in the future.
Keywords
Great Book Mathematical Predication Meaning Extension Predicational View Predicational TheorizePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aristotle (1952a). Physics. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 8, pp. 257–355). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
- Aristotle (1952b). On the parts of animals. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 9, pp. 159–229). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
- Bacon, F. (1952). Advancement of learning. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world. (Vol. 30). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
- Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Assocs.Google Scholar
- Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howard, D. V. (1983). Cognitive psychology: Memory, language and thought. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 43–75). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
- Maze, J. F. (1986). The composition of the ego in a determinist psychology. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, H. van Rappard, & W. W. Staats (Eds.), Current issues in theoretical psychology (pp. 189–199). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palter, R. (1956). Philosophic principles and scientific theory. Philosophy of Science, 23, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rychlak, J. F. (1981). A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Rychlak, J. F. (1984). Logical learning theory: Kuhnian anomaly or medievalism revisited? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 389–416.Google Scholar
- Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Assocs.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar