Siblings as Effective Socializing Agents: Evidence from Central Mexico

  • Patricia Goldring Zukow

Abstract

Although siblings act as socializing agents in cultures throughout the world (Weisner & Gallimore, 1977), historical and theoretical considerations have led many Western researchers to ignore or underestimate the positive contribution of siblings to the socialization of younger family members (Zukow, Chapter 1, this volume). Although the family is recognized as the matrix in which socialization first occurs, I will argue that siblings as well as adults engage in this process with younger family members. To assess the contribution of siblings to the socialization of younger siblings from a fresh perspective, I will address the social-interactive and perceptual processes underlying socialization. From this perspective, socialization is a process of co-construction in which caregivers and novice members are continuously building up and breaking down the social world from the ebb and flow of perceptual information. The degree to which siblings embody the role of socializing agent will be examined by evaluating evidence from Western and Third World studies. The discussion will consider the relative value, effectiveness, and uniqueness of socialization by siblings, including its impact on the direction of future research and the shape of emerging theories of socialization.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramovitch, R., Corter, C, & Lando, B. (1979). Sibling interaction in the home. Child Development, 50, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramovitch, R., Corter, C, Pepier, D.J., & Stanhope, L. (1986). Sibling and peer interaction: A final follow-up and a comparison. Child Development, 57, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, E. (1984, November). Language socialization of blind children by their sighted-siblings. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meeting, Denver.Google Scholar
  4. Berndt, T.J., & Bulleit, T.N. (1985). Effects of sibling relationships on preschoolers’ behavior at home and at school. Developmental Psychology, 56, 761–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, L., Hood, L., & Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development: If, when, and why. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 380–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brofenbrenner, U. (1976, March). Ecological validity in research in human development. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, G.H., Stoneman, Z., & MacKinnon, C. (1982). Role asymmetries among schoolage children, their younger siblings, and their friends. Child Development, 53, 1364–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J.S. (1977). Early social interaction and language acquisition. In H.R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 271–289). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, IS., & Sherwood, V. (1976). Peekaboo and the learning of rule structures. In J.S. Bruner, A. Jolly, and K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 277–285). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cicirelli, V.G. (1972). The effect of sibling relationships on concept learning of young children taught by child teachers. Child Development, 43, 282–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R. P. (1978). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 2, 34–37.Google Scholar
  12. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In K.S. Pope & J.L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 335–358). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Demuth, K. (1984, November). Basotho peer and sibling interactions. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meeting, Denver.Google Scholar
  14. Dent, C., & Zukow, P.G. (Eds.) (in press). The idea of innateness: Effects on language and communication research. Developmental Psychobiology. Google Scholar
  15. Dunn, J. (1983). Sibling relationships in early childhood. Child Development, 54, 787–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1982). The speech of two- and three-year olds to infant siblings: “Baby talk” and the context of communication. Journal of Child Language, 9, 579–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, S., & Rogoff, B. (1982). The strategies and efficacy of child versus adult teachers. Child Development, 53, 730–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiese, B.H. (1987, April). Mother-infant interaction and symbolic play in the second year of life: A contextual analysis. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  19. Flavell, J.H. (1974). The development of inferences about others. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Understanding other persons. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Flavell, J.H. (1978). The development of knowledge about visual perception. In C.B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 25). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  21. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1982). The contribution of siblings and peers to the parenting process. In M.J. Kostelnik, A.I. Rabin, L.A. Phenice, & A.K. Soderman (Eds.), Child nurturance: Vol. 2, Patterns of supplementary parenting (pp. 69–100). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, W., & Rogoff, B. (1982). The role of instruction in memory development: Some methodological choices. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 6–12.Google Scholar
  23. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Garfinkel, H. (1972). Remarks on ethnomethodology. In J.J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Ed.), The ethnography of communication (pp. 301–324). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  25. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structure of practical actions. In J.D. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and development (pp. 338–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  26. Gleason, J.B. (1973). Code-switching in children’s language. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 159–167). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  28. Greenfield, P.M., & Lave, J. (1982). Cognitive aspects of informal education. In D.A. Wagner & H.W. Stevenson (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp. 181–207). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  29. Greenfield, P.M., & Smith, J.H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Handel, G. (1986). Beyond sibling rivalry: An empirically grounded theory of sibling relationships. In P.A. Adler & P. Adler (Eds.), Sociological studies of child development (pp. 105–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  31. Keenan, E.O. (1974). Making it last: Repetition in children’s discourse. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Koester, L.S., & Johnson, J.E. (1984). Children’s instructional strategies: A comparison of sibling and peer tutoring. Acta Paedologica, 1, 23–32.Google Scholar
  33. Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  34. Lamb, M. (1978). Interactions between eighteen-month-olds and their preschool-age siblings. Child Development, 49, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamb, M. (1982). Sibling relationships across the lifespan: An overview and introduction. In M. Lamb & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 1–12). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Lamb, M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Lomnitz, L. (1975). Como sobreviven los marginados. Mexico, D.F.: Siglo Veinti-uno Editores.Google Scholar
  38. Madsen, M.C., & Shapira, A. (1970). Cooperative and competitive behavior of urban Afro-American, Anglo-American, Mexican-American, and Mexican village children. Developmental Psychology, 3, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malpas, R.S. (1977). Theory and method in cross-cultural research. American Psychologist, 32, 1069–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mannle, S., & Tomasello, M. (1987). Fathers, siblings, and the bridge hypothesis. In K.E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol. 6, pp. 23–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Mehan, H. (1982). The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P. Gilmore & A.A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 59–87). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  42. Mehan, H., & Wood, H. (1975). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality measurement. American Psychologist, 32, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelson, K.E., Carskaddon, G., & Bonvillian, J. (1973). Syntax acquisition: Impact of experimental variation in adult verbal interaction with the child. Child Development, 44, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ochs, E. (1987). Input: A socio-cultural perspective. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 305–319). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In R. Shweder & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotions (pp. 276–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. O’Connell, B., & Bretherton, I. (1984). Toddler’s play, alone and with mother: The role of maternal guidance. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 337–368). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
  49. Power, T.G., & Parke, R.D. (1986). Patterns of early socialization: Mother- and father-infant interactions in the home. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rogoff, B., Malkin, C, & Gilbride, K. (1984). Interaction with babies as guidance in development. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), New directions for child development: No. 23, Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 31–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, J. (1974). Early language development: Towards a communicative analysis. In M.P.M. Richards (Ed.), The integration of the child into the social world (pp. 185–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saxe, G.B., Gearhart, M., & Guberman, S.R. (1984). Towards understanding the social organization of early development. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 19–30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Schegloff, E. (1972). Notes on conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schutz, A. (1971). Collected papers, Vol. 1. The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  58. Shantz, C.U. (1975). The development of social cognition. In E.M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Shatz, M., & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (No. 152).Google Scholar
  60. Shweder, R.M. (1982). Beyond self-constructed knowledge: The study of culture and morality. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 41–69.Google Scholar
  61. Slade, A. (1987). A longitudinal study of maternal involvement and symbolic play during the toddler period. Child Development, 58, 267–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Snow, CE. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language, 4, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Snow, CE. (1981). The uses of imitation. Journal of Child Language, 8, 205–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Snow, CE., Perlmann, R., & Nathan, D. (1987). Why routines are different: Toward a multiple-factor model of the relation between input and language acquisition. In K.E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol. 6, pp. 65–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Stewart, R.B. (1983). Sibling interaction: The role of the older child as teacher for the younger. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 47–68.Google Scholar
  66. Stoneman, Z., Brody, G.H., & MacKinnon, C (1984). Naturalistic observations of children’s activities and roles while playing with their siblings and friends. Child Development, 55, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sutton-Smith, B. (1978). Comment to Weisner and Gallimore, “Child and sibling caretaking.” Current Anthropology, 18, 184–185.Google Scholar
  68. Tomasello, M., & Mannle, S. (1985). Pragmatics of sibling speech to one-year olds. Child Development, 56, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vasic, V. (1983). Speech with siblings. Govor sa sestrom i bratom (pp. 184–197). Novi Sad, Jugoslavia: Institute of Jugoslavian Languages, Faculty of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  70. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Weisner, T.S., & Gallimore, R. (1977). My brother’s keeper: Child and sibling caretaking. Current Anthropology, 18, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wertsch, J.V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), New directions for child development: No. 23, Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  73. Wertsch, J.V., McNamee, G.D., McLane, IB., & Budwig, N. (1980). The adult-child dyad as a problem-solving system. Child Development, 51, 1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wertsch, J.V, & Rogoff, B. (1984). Editor’s notes. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch, (Eds.), New directions for child development: No. 23, Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  75. Westerman, M.A., & Havstad, L.F. (1982). A pattern-oriented model of caretaker-child interaction, psychopathology, and control. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language (Vol. 3, pp. 204–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  76. Wood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zajonc, R.B., & Markus, G.B. (1975). Birth order and intellectual development. Psychological Review, 82, 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zukow, P.G. (1983). The transition from gestural to linguistic communication: Social variation in a rural-born population. ERIC ED#23155; An intra-ethnic comparison of the transition from nonverbal to verbal communication: Two case studies in Central Mexico.Google Scholar
  79. Zukow, P.G. (1984a). Folk theories of comprehension and caregiver style in a rural-born population in Central Mexico. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 6, 62–67. Infancia y Aprendizaje (1987) IYA, 39–40, 151–159.Google Scholar
  80. Zukow, P.G. (1984b). The relative contribution of sibling and adult caregivers to the emergence of play in Central Mexico. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meetings, Denver; ERIC, ED#23154.Google Scholar
  81. Zukow, P.G. (1985, December). The contribution of siblings to the emergence of linguistic representation in Central Mexico. Paper presented at the American Anthropology Association Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  82. Zukow, P.G. (1986). The relationship between interaction with the caregiver and the emergence of play activities during the one-word period. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zukow, P.G. (1987, July). Socializing attention: The relation between caregiver input and the emergence of linguistic representation in Central Mexico. Paper presented at the International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  84. Zukow, P.G., Reilly, J.S., & Greenfield, P.M. (1982). Making the absent present: Facilitating the transition from sensorimotor to linguistic communication. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language (Vol. 3, pp. 1–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Zukow, P.G., & Schmidt, C. (1987, April). Socializing attention in the U.S. and Central Mexico: Caregiver input and the emergence of linguistic representation. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  86. Zukow, P.G., & Schmidt, C. (1988, April). Socializing attention: The perceptual bases for language socialization. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society on Infant Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Goldring Zukow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations