On Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation and Selection for Multivariate Hypergeometric Distributions

  • TaChen Liang
Part of the Statistics for Industry and Technology book series (SIT)

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the problem of simultaneous estimation for n independent multivariate hypergeometric distributions π(M i ,m i ,s i ), i = 1,…,n, and simultaneous selection of the most probable event for each of the n π(M i , m i , s i ). In order to model the uncertainty of the unknown parameters s i , i = 1,…,n, and to incorporate information from the n π(M i , m i , s i ), a two-stage prior distribution on the parameters s i , i = 1,…,n, is introduced. With this hierarchical structure of prior distributions, we derive simultaneous hierarchical Bayesian estimators for s i , i = 1,…,n, and simultaneous selection rule for selecting the most probable event for each of the n π(M i , m i , s i ). We compare the performance of the hierarchical Bayesian procedures to those of the “pure” Bayesian procedures. The relative regret Bayes risks of the hierarchical Bayesian procedures are used as measures of the optimality of the procedures. It is shown that, for the estimation problem, the relative regret Bayes risk of the hierarchical Bayesian estimator converges to zero at a rate of order 0(n -1); and for the selection problem, the relative regret Bayes risk of the hierarchical Bayesian selection rule converges to zero at a rate of order 0(e - ) for some positive constant β

Keywords and phrases

Hierarchical prior most probable event multivariate hypergeometric distribution simultaneous estimation simultaneous selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balakrishnan, N. and Ma, Y. (1996). Empirical Bayes rules for selecting the most and least probable multivariate hypergeometric event, Statistics & Probability Letters, 27, 181–188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balakrishnan, N. and Ma, Y. (1997). On empirical Bayes rules for selecting the best hypergeometric population, Sequential Analysis (to appear).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartlett, N. S. and Govindarajulu, Z. (1970). Selecting a subset containing the best hypergeometric population, Sankhyā, Series B, 32, 341–352.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bechhofer, R. E., Santner, T. J. and Goldsman, D. M. (1995). Design and Analysis of Experiments For Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cressie, N. and Scheult, A. (1985). Empirical Bayes estimation in sampling inspection, Biometrika, 72, 451–458.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta, S. S. and Liang, T. (1994). On empirical Bayes selection rules for sampling inspection, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 38, 43–64.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, S. S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1979). Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations. New York: John Wiley &; Sons.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1997). Discrete Multivariate Distributions, New York: John Wiley &; Sons.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walter, G. G. and Hamedani, G. G. (1988). Empiric Bayes estimation of hypergeometric probability, Metrika, 35, 127–143.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • TaChen Liang
    • 1
  1. 1.Wayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations