Riparian Forest Ecosystems as Filters for Nonpoint-Source Pollution

  • Richard Lowrance


Riparian (streamside) ecosystems have been the subject of ecosystem research for about the last twenty years. Ecosystem research has shown that riparian areas are especially effective controllers of nitrogen and sediment movement to streams and other water bodies. Nitrogen control is primarily the result of biotic processes. Sediment control is primarily caused by physical processes that are enhanced by such biotic interactions as enhanced infiltration and leaf litter at the soil surface. Riparian areas are increasingly being used as a landscape-and watershed-management technique to reduce the risk of pollution and to create and preserve healthy stream ecosystems. The management practices recommended for riparian areas are based on ecosystem research. Riparian ecosystem policies and management are a success story for the application of ecosystem science to real-world problems. Riparian ecosystem research has been used to develop generalized management practices for USDA action agencies such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service. Ecosystem-management recommendations for riparian areas have been incorporated into such programs as the Coastal Zone Management Act Reauthorization and the Chesapeake Bay Program. The USDA has incorporated riparian policies into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) reauthorized in the 1996 Farm Bill. The CRP allows farmers to voluntarily enroll such environmentally sensitive lands as riparian ecosystems because of the high environmental benefits associated with riparian areas compared to other lands. The success of riparian ecosystem research in shaping riparian policy and management results from multiple factors including: agreement among major studies on the effectiveness of riparian ecosystems for nonpoint-source pollution control; flexibility of management practices; and use of riparian ecosystems for multiple functions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. 1996.Riparian Forest Buffers—White Paper. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  2. Benke, A.C., R.L. Henry III, D.M. Gillespie, and R.H. Hunter. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams.Fisheries10:8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisson, P.A., R.E. Bilby, M.D. Bryant, C.A. Dolloff, G.B. Grette, R.A. House et al. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. Pages 143–190 in E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy eds.Streamside management forestry and fishery interactions.Institute Of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  4. Bohlke, J.K., and J.M. Denver. 1995. Combined use of groundwater dating, chemical, and isotopic analyses to resolve the history and fate of nitrate contamination in two agricultural watersheds.Water Resources Research31:2319–2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borman, F.H., and G.E. Likens. 1967. Nutrient cycling.Science155:424–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosch, D.D., J.M. Sheridan, and R. Lowrance. 1996. Hydraulic gradients and flow rates of a shallow coastal plain aquifer in a forested riparian buffer.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers39:865–871.Google Scholar
  7. Chesapeake Executive Council. 1994. Directive No. 94–1: Riparian Forest Buffers. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Chesapeake Executive Council. 1996. Adoption Statement on Riparian Forest Buffers. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  9. Chesters, G., and L.J. Schierow. 1985. A primer on nonpoint pollution.Journal of Soil & Water Conservation40:9–14.Google Scholar
  10. Chichester, F.W. 1976. The impact of fertilizer use and crop management on nitrogen content of subsurface water draining from upland agricultural watersheds.Journal of Environmental Quality5:413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A.B. 1990. Nitrate depletion in the riparian zone and stream channel of a small headwater catchment.Hydrobiologia202:13–26.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, J.R., J.W. Gilliam, R.B. Daniels, and W.P. Robarge. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment.Soil Science Society of America Journal51:416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Correll, D.L., and D.E. Weller. 1989. Factors limiting processes in freshwater wetlands: an agricultural primary stream riparian forest. Pages 9–23 in R. Sharitz and J. Gibbons, eds.Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  14. Correll, D.L., T.E. Jordan, and D.E. Weller. 1994. Failure of agricultural riparian buffers to protect surface waters from groundwater contamination. InProceedings of the international conference on groundwater/surface water ecotones.Cambridge University Press. London, England.Google Scholar
  15. Daniels, R.B., and J.W. Gilliam. 1996. Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters.Soil Science Society of America Journal60:246–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dillaha, T.A., R.B. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, and D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint-source pollution control.Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers32:513–519.Google Scholar
  17. Dosskey, M.G., R.C. Schultz, and T.M. Isenhart. 1997.A riparian buffer design for cropland. Agroforestry Notes No. 5. United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service-National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrenfeld, J.G. 1987. The role of woody vegetation in preventing ground water pollution by nitrogen from septic tank leachate.Water Resources Research21:605–614.Google Scholar
  19. Fail, J.L., Jr., B.L. Haines, and R.L. Todd. 1985. Riparian forest communities and their role in nutrient conservation in an agricultural watershed.American Journal of Alternative Agriculture2:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fail, J.L., Jr., M.N. Hamzah, B.L. Haines, and R.L. Todd. 1986. Above and below ground biomass, production, and element accumulation in riparian forests of an agricultural watershed. Pages 193–224 in D.L. Correll, ed.Watershed Research Perspectives.Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Forestry Workgroup. 1996. Forestry best management practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Tracking accomplishments. Forestry Workgroup, Nutrient Subcommittee. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Frissel, M.J. ed. 1977. Cycling of mineral nutrients in agricultural ecosystems.Agro-Ecosystems4:1–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregory, S.V., F.J. Swanson, W.A. McKee, and K.W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones.BioScience41:540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groffman, P.M., A.J. Gold, and R.C. Simmons. 1992. Nitrate dynamics in riparian forests: microbial studies.Journal of Environmental Quality21:666–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanson, G.C., P.M. Groffman, and A.J. Gold. 1994a. Denitrification in riparian wetlands receiving high and low groundwater nitrate inputs.Journal of Environmental Quality23:917–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanson, G.C., P.M. Groffman, and A.J. Gold. 1994b. Symptoms of nitrogen saturation in a riparian wetland.Ecological Applications4:750–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harmon, M.E., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S.V. Gregory, J.D. Lattin et al. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems.Advances in Ecological Research15:133–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hendrickson, O.Q., Jr. 1982. Flux of nitrogen and carbon gases in bottomland soils of an agricultural watershed. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, A.R. 1990. Groundwater flow paths in relation to nitrogen chemistry in the near-stream zone.Hydrobiologia206:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill, A.R. 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones.Journal of Environmental Quality25:743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacobs, T.C., and J.W. Gilliam. 1985. Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters.Journal of Environmental Quality14:472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaworski, N.A., P.M. Groffman, A. Keller, and A.C. Prager. 1992. A watershed-scale analysis of nitrogen loading: the Upper Potomac River.Estuaries15:83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jordan, T.E., D.L. Correll, and D.E. Weller. 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland.Journal of Environmental Quality22:467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson, W.A., L.E. Asmussen, E.W. Hauser, and A.W. White. 1973. Nitrate in surface runoff and subsurface flow from a small agricultural watershed.Journal of Environmental Quality2:480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karr, J.R., and I.J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface.Science201:229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohl, D.H., G.B. Shearer, and B. Commoner. 1971. Fertilizer nitrogen: contribution to surface water nitrate in a cornbelt watershed.Science174:1331–1334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Likens, G.E., F.H. Bormann, R.S. Pierce, J.S. Eaton, and N.M. Johnson. 1977.Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem.Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowrance, R.R., R.L. Todd, and L.E. Asmussen. 1983. Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed.Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment10:371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lowrance, R., R.L. Todd, and L.E. Asmussen. 1984a. Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: I. Phreatic movement.Journal of Environmental Quality13: 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowrance, R.R., R.L. Todd, J. Fail, Jr., O. Hendrickson, Jr., R. Leonard, and L. Asmussen. 1984b. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds.Bioscience34:374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lowrance, R., R.A. Leonard, L.E. Asmussen, and R.L. Todd. 1985. Nutrient budgets for agricultural watersheds in the southeastern coastal plains.Ecology66:287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lowrance, R., J.K. Sharpe, and J.M. Sheridan. 1986. Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation41:266–271.Google Scholar
  43. Lowrance, R., S. McIntyre, and J.C. Lance. 1988. Erosion and deposition in a coastal plain watershed measured using CS-137.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation43:195–198.Google Scholar
  44. Lowrance, R. 1992. Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian soil.Journal of Environmental Quality21:401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lowrance, R., L.S. Altier, J.D. Newbold, R.R. Schnabel, P.M. Groffman, and J.M. Denver. 1995.Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.Report No. EPA 903-R-95–004; CBP/TRS 134/95. U.S. Em. Profection Hgencyl Chesapeake Bay Program Office Annapolis. MD.Google Scholar
  46. Lowrance, R., G. Vellidis, R.D. Wauchope, P. Gay, and D.D. Bosch. 1997. Herbicide transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system.Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers40:1047–1057.Google Scholar
  47. Magette, W.L., R.B. Brinsfield, R.E. Palmer, and J.D. Wood. 1989. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips.Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers32:663–667.Google Scholar
  48. Meyer, J.L., and J. O’Hop. 1983. The effects of watershed disturbance on dissolved organic dynamics of a stream.American Midland Naturalist109:175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Myers, C.F., J. Meek, S. Tuller, and A. Weinberg. 1985. Nonpoint-sources of water pollution.Journal of Soil & Water Conservation40:14–19.Google Scholar
  50. Peterjohn, W.T., and D.L. Correll. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest.Ecology65:1466–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Phillips, P.J., J.M. Denver, R.J. Shedlock, and P.A. Hamilton. 1993. Effect of forested wetlands on nitrate concentrations in ground water and surface water on the Delmarva Peninsula.Wetlands13:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reilly, T.E., L.N. Plummer, P.J. Phillips, and E. Busenberg. 1994. The use of simulation and multiple environmental tracers to quantify ground water flow in a shallow aquifer.Water Resources Research421–433.Google Scholar
  53. Schipper, L.A., A.B. Cooper, C.G. Harfoot, and W.J. Dyck. 1993. Regulators of denitrification in an organic riparian soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry25:925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schultz, R.C., J. Colletti, W. Simpkins, M. Thompson, and C. Mize. 1994. Developing a multispecies riparian buffer strip agroforestry system. Pages 203–225 inRiparian ecosystems in the humid U.S.: Functions values and management.National Association of Conservation Districts, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Simmons, R.C., A.J. Gold, and P.M. Groffman. 1992. Nitrate dynamics in riparian forests: groundwater studies.Journal of Environmental Quality21:659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stayer, K.W., and R.B. Brinsfield. 1996. Seepage of groundwater nitrate from a riparian agroecosystem into the Wye River estuary.Estuaries19:359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Swank, W.T., and J.E. Douglass. 1977. Nutrient budgets for undisturbed and manipulated hardwood forest ecosystems in the mountains of North Carolina. Pages 343–362 in D.L. Correll ed.Watershed research in eastern North America.Smithsonian Institution, Edgewater, MD.Google Scholar
  58. Sweeney, B.W. 1993. Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America.Proceedings Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia144:291–340.Google Scholar
  59. Thomas, L.M. 1985. Management of nonpoint-source pollution: what priority?Journal Soil & Water Conservaton40:8.Google Scholar
  60. USDA. 1997. Clinton administration announces final conservation program rules. USDA Press Release No. 0046.97.Google Scholar
  61. USDA NRCS. 1995.Riparian Forest Buffer 391. Model state standard and general specifications. Watershed Science Institute, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  62. US EPA. 1991.Guidance for water quality based decisions: the TMDL process. Report No. EPA 440/4–91–001. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. US EPA. 1993.Guidance specifying management measures for sources of nonpoint pollution in coastal waters. Report No. EPA-840-B-93–001c. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  64. US EPA. 1994.National Water Quality Inventory: 1994 Report to Congress. Report No. EPA 503/9–94/006. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  65. Vitousek, P.M., and W.A. Reiners. 1975. Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis.BioScience25:376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Warwick, J., and A.R. Hill. 1988. Nitrate depletion in the riparian zone of a small woodland stream.Hydrobiologia157:231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Welsch, D.J. 1991.Riparian Forest Buffers. United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service Pub. No. NA-PR-07–91. United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service, Radnor, PA.Google Scholar
  68. Yates, P., and J.M. Sheridan. 1983. Estimating the effectiveness of vegetated floodplains/wetlands as nitrate-nitrite and orthophosphorus filters.Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment9:303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Lowrance

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations