Estimation of Disease Rates in Small Areas: A new Mixed Model for Spatial Dependence

  • Brian G. Leroux
  • Xingye Lei
  • Norman Breslow
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 116)

Abstract

In this paper, a new model is proposed for spatial dependence that includes separate parameters for overdispersion and the strength of spatial dependence. The new dependence structure is incorporated into a generalized linear mixed model useful for the estimation of disease incidence rates in small geographic regions. The mixed model allows for log-linear covariate adjustment and local smoothing of rates through estimation of the spatially correlated random effects. Computer simulation studies compare the new model with the following sub-models: intrinsic autoregression, an independence model, and a model with no random effects. The major finding was that regression coefficient estimates based on fitting intrinsic autoregression to independent data can have very low precision compared with estimates based on the full model. Additional simulation studies demonstrate that penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) estimation generally performs very well although the estimates are slightly biased for very small counts.

Key words

Random effect log-linear model penalized quasi-likelihood Gaussian intrinsic auto-regression generalized linear mixed model Monte Carlo simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Besag, J., Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, (1974), pp. 192–236.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Besag, J., York, J. and Mollié, A., Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, (1991), pp. 1–20.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Breslow, N.E. and Clayton, D.G., Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88 (1993), pp. 9–25.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Clayton, D. and Kaldor, J., Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in desease mapping, Biometrics, 43, (1987), pp. 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cressie, N., Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York, 1991, pp. 900.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kemp, I., Boyle, P., Smans, M. and Muir, C. Atlas of Cancer in Scotland, 1975–1980. Incidence and Epidemiologic Perspective. IARC Scientific Publication No. 72, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Singh, B.B. and Shukla, G.K., A test of autoregression in Gaussian spatial processes, Biometrika, 70, (1983), pp. 523–527.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Yasui, Y. and Lele, S., A regression method for spatial disease rates: an estimating function approach, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, (1997), pp. 21–32.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zeger, S.L., Liang, K.-Y., and Albert, P.S., Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach, Biometrics, 44, (1988), pp. 1049–1060.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian G. Leroux
    • 1
  • Xingye Lei
    • 1
  • Norman Breslow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations