Fermentation Performance Assessment of a Genomically Integrated Xylose-Utilizing Recombinant of Zymomonas mobilis 39676
Abstract
In pH-controlled batch fermentations with pure sugar synthetic hard-wood hemicellulose (1% [w/v] glucose and 4% xylose) and corn stover hydrolysate (8% glucose and 3.5% xylose) lacking acetic acid, the xylose-utilizing, tetracycline (Tc)-sensitive, genomically integrated variant of Zymomonas mobilis ATCC 39676 (designated strain C25) exhibited growth and fermentation performance that was inferior to National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s first-generation, Tc-resistant, plasmid-bearing Zymomonas recombinants. With C25, xylose fermentation following glucose exhaustion was markedly slower, and the ethanol yield (based on sugars consumed) was lower, owing primarily to an increase in lactic acid formation. There was an apparent increased sensitivity to acetic acid inhibition with C25 compared with recombinants 39676:pZB4L, CP4:pZB5, and ZM4:pZB5. However, strain C25 performed well in continuous fermentation with nutrient-rich synthetic corn stover medium over the dilution range 0.03–0.06/h, with a maximum process ethanol yield at D = 0.03/h of 0.46 g/g and a maximum ethanol productivity of 3 g/(L-h). With 0.35% (w/v) acetic acid in the medium, the process yield at D = 0.04/h dropped to 0.32 g/g, and the maximum productivity decreased by 50% to 1.5 g/(L-h). Under the same operating conditions, rec Zm ZM4:pZB5 performed better; however, the medium contained 20 mg/L of Tc to constantly maintain selective pressure. The absence of any need for antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes makes the chromosomal integrant C25 more compatible with current regulatory specifications for biocatalysts in large-scale commercial operations.
Index Entries
Recombinant Zymomonas C25 genomic integrant xylose ethanol biomass hydrolysate acetate inhibitionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Lawford, G. R., Lavers, B. H., Good, D., Charley, R. C., Fein, J. E. and Lawford, H. G. (1982), in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ethanol from Biomass, Duckworth, H., ed., Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 482–507.Google Scholar
- 2.Lawford, H. G. (1987), US Patent 4,647,534.Google Scholar
- 3.Lawford, H. G. (1988), in VIII International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 21–27.Google Scholar
- 4.Lawford, H. G. (1988), in Canadian Power Alcohol Conference, Candlish, B., ed., Biomass Energy Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, pp. 245–251.Google Scholar
- 5.Lacis, L. S. and Lawford, H. G. (1989), in Bioenergy— Proceedings of the 7th Canadian Bioenergy R&D Seminar, Hogen, E., ed., NRC Canada, Ottawa, pp. 411–416.Google Scholar
- 6.Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (1991), in Energy from Biomass and Wastes XV, Klass, D. L., ed., Institute Gas Technology, Chicago, pp. 583–622.Google Scholar
- 7.Zhang, M., Eddy, C., Deanda, K., Finkelstein, M., and Picataggio, S. K. (1995), Science 267,240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Picataggio, S., Zhang, M., Eddy, C. K., Deanda, K., and Finkelstein, M. (1996), US Patent 5,514,583.Google Scholar
- 9.Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., and McMillan, J. D. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 63–65, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 63–65,287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70–72,161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., Mohagheghi, A., and McMillan, J. D. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70–72,353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (1999), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77–79,235–249.Google Scholar
- 14.Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., Mohagheghi, A., and McMillan, J. D. (1999), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77–79,191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lawford, H. G. and Rousseau, J. D. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86,277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., Mohagheghi, A., and McMillan, J. D. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hinman, N. D., Wright, J. D., Hoagland, W., and Wyman, C. E. (1989), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21,391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sprenger, G. A. (1993),/. Bacteriol. 27,225–237.Google Scholar
- 19.Feldman, S. D., Sahm, H., and Sprenger, G. A. (1992), Appl. Microbiol. 38, 354–361.Google Scholar
- 20.Picataggio, S. K., Zhang, M., Eddy, C. K., Deanda, K., and Finkelstein, M. (1998), US Patent 5,726,053.Google Scholar
- 21.Deanda, K. A., Eddy, C., Zhang, M., and Picataggio, S. (1996), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62,4465–4470.Google Scholar
- 22.Zhang, M., Chou, Y. C., Lai, X. K., Milstrey, S., Danielson, N., Evans, K., Mohagheghi, A., and Finkelstein, M. (1999), 21st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Fort Collins, CO (abstract no. 2–16).Google Scholar
- 23.Rogers, P. L., Joachimsthal, E. L., and Haggett, K. D. (1997), /. Australasian Biotechnol. 7,304–309.Google Scholar
- 24.Joachimsthal, E., Haggett, K. D., and Rogers, P. L. (1999), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77–79 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Krishnan, M. S., Blanco, M., Shattuck, C. K., Nghiem, N. P., and Davison, B. H. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86,525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Joachimsthal, E. L. and Rogers, P. L. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86,343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dennison, E. and Abbas, C. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN (abstract no. 2–04), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 28.Ngheim, N. P., Krishnan, M. S., Davison, B. H., Jackson, A. N., and Cofer, T. M. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN (abstract no. 3–25), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 29.Dowe, N., Newman, M. M., Mohagheghi, A., and McMillan, J. D. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN (abstract no. 6–20), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 30.McMillan, J. D. (1994), in Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuels Production, Himmel, M. E., Baker, J. O., and Overend, R. A., eds., ACS Symposium Series 566, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Foody, B. F. (2000), 21st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Fort Collins, CO (abstract no. 6–01), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 32.Lawford, H. G., Rousseau, J. D., and Tolan, J. S. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN, Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 33.Foody, B. F. and Tolan, J. S. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN (abstract no. 6–07), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 34.Zhang, M., Chou, Y. C., Mohagheghi, A., Evans, K., Milstrey, S., Lai, X. K., and Finkelstein, M. (2000), 22nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN (abstract no. 2–03), Humana, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
- 35.Zhang, M., Chou, Y.-C., Picataggio, S. K., and Finkelstein, M. (1998), US Patent 5,843,760.Google Scholar