Advertisement

Soft Systems Methodology

  • Peter ChecklandEmail author
  • John Poulter
Chapter
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Soft systems methodology (SSM) is an approach for tackling problematical, messy situations of all kinds. It is an action-oriented process of inquiry into problematic situations in which users learn their way from finding out about the situation, to taking action to improve it. The learning emerges via an organised process in which the situation is explored using a set of models of purposeful action (each built to encapsulate a single worldview) as intellectual devices, or tools, to inform and structure discussion about a situation and how it might be improved. This paper, written by the original developer Peter Checkland and practitioner John Poulter, gives a clear and concise account of the approach that covers SSM’s specific techniques, the learning cycle process of the methodology and the craft skills which practitioners develop. This concise but theoretically robust account nevertheless includes the fundamental concepts, techniques, core tenets described through a wide range of settings.

References

  1. Bell, S., Benatti, F., Edwards, N. R., Laney, R., Morse, D. R., Piccolo, L., & Zanetti, O. (2018). Smart cities and M 3: Rapid research, meaningful metrics and co-design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brocklesby, J., & Beall, E. (2018). Processes of engagement and methodology design in Community Operational Research–Insights from the indigenous peoples sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 996–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, D. (2014). Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research, 12(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and Its Use Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Emes, M., Smith, S., Ward, S., & Smith, A. (2018). Improving the patient discharge process: implementing actions derived from a soft systems methodology study. Health Systems, 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Ison, R. (2017). Systemic inquiry. In Systems Practice: How to Act (pp. 251–274). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McLellan, J. D. and Blanchard, R. E., (2018). Micro-generation in conflict: The conditions necessary to power economic development in rural Afghanistan. Available via: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32954
  10. Proches, C. N. G., & Bodhanya, S. (2015). An application of soft systems methodology in the sugar industry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Open University 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emeritus Professor of Systems, Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Independent ConsultantBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations