Advertisement

Pollution Control from Stationary Sources

  • Subhes C. BhattacharyyaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the issue of pollution from stationary sources and introduces available mitigation options. It focuses on both direct and indirect control mechanisms and indicates the benefits and shortcomings of each option. The chapter elaborates on the cap-and-trade programme used in the US for mitigation of acid rains and also introduces the problems related to indoor air pollution.

Keywords

Air pollution Control strategies Standards Taxes and charges Cap and trade Performance Technology 

References

  1. Aunan, K., Hansen, M. H., & Wang, S. (2018). Introduction: Air pollution in China. The China Quarterly, 234, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. (2018). London: BP plc.Google Scholar
  3. Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R., & Albalak, R. (2002). The health effects of indoor air pollution exposure in developing countries. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  4. Burtraw, D., & Palmer, K. (2003). The Paparazzi take a look at a living legend: The SO2 cap-and-trade program for power plants in the United States. Resources for the future discussion paper 15. http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-03-15.pdf.
  5. Burtraw, D., & Szembelan, S. J. (2009). U.S. Emissions trading markets for SOx and NOx, RFF-DP-09-40. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  6. Chestnut, L. G., & Mills, D. M. (2005). A fresh look at the benefits and the cost of the US Acid Rain program. Journal of Environmental Management, 77(3), 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Gouw, JA; DD Parish; GJ Frost and M Trainer, 2014, Reduced emission of CO2, NOx and SO2 from US power plants owing to switch from coal to natural gas with combined cycle technology, Earth’s Future, 2:75–82,  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ef000196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Leeuw, F, Benesova, N., & Horalek, J. (2016). Evaluation of international air quality standards. Technical Paper 2016/10. European Technical Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. https://acm.eionet.europa.eu/reports/docs/ETCACM_TP_2016_10_AAQstandards.pdf.
  9. Defense, Environmental. (2000). From obstacle to opportunity: How acid rain emissions trading is delivering cleaner air. New York: Environmental Defense.Google Scholar
  10. EPA. (2005). Evaluating ozone control programs in the Eastern United States, focus on NOx budget trading program. Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2005/ozonenbp.pdf.
  11. EPA. (2010). Acid rain and related programs: 2009 emission compliance and market analyses. Washington, DC: Environment Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  12. EPA. (2011). 2010 Progress report: Emission, compliance and market analyses. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  13. Eurostat. (2019). Environmental tax statistics, eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/5085.pdf.
  14. Ezzati, M., & Kammen, D. M. (2002). Household energy, indoor air pollution and public health in developing countries, RFF Issue bried 02-26. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  15. Guttikunda, S. K., Goel, R., & Pant, P. (2014). Nature of air pollution, emission sources and management in Indian cities. Atmospheric Environment, 95, 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IEA. (2012). Technology roadmaps: High efficiency, low emissions coal-fired power generation. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  17. IEA. (2016). Energy and air pollution, world energy outlook special report 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Lovei, M. (1998). Phasing out lead from gasoline: Worldwide experiences and policy implications. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANTRANSPORT/Resources/b09phasing.pdf.
  19. Millstein, D., R Wyser, M Bolinger and G Barbose, 2017, The climate and air-quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United States, Nature Energy, 2,  https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2018.134.
  20. OTC. (2003a). NOX budget program: 1999–2002 progress report. Washington, DC: Ozone Transportation Commission.Google Scholar
  21. OTC. (2003b). 2002 OTC NOx budget program compliance report. Washington, DC: OTC. http://www.otcair.org/document.asp?fview=Report#.
  22. Palit, D., & Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2014). Adoption of cleaner cookstoves: Barriers and wayforward. Boiling Point, 64, 6–11.Google Scholar
  23. Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N. (2017). Lessons learned from three decades of experience of cap and trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stavropoulos, S., Wall, R., & Xu, Y. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1378–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1363858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. TERI. (2015). Green growth and air pollution in India. New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute. https://www.teriin.org/projects/green/pdf/National-Air-Pollution.pdf.
  26. Warwick, H., & Doig, A. (2004). Smoke—The killer in the kitchen. London: ITDG Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WHO. (2016). Burning opportunity: Clean household energy for health, sustainable development and wellbeing of women and children. Geneva: World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/airpollution/publications/burning-opportunities/en/.
  28. World Bank. (1992). World development report 1992: Development and the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. EPA. (2003). Tools of the trade: A guide to designing and operating a Cap and Trade Programme for pollution control. Washington, DC: US Energy Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  2. Eskeland, G. S., & Devarajan, S. (1996). Taxing bads by taxing goods: Pollution control with presumptive charges. World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Krupnick, A., Morgenstern, R., Fisher, C., Rolfe, K., Logarta, J., & Rufo, B. (2003). Air pollution control policy options for Metro Manila, RFF Discussion paper 03-30. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  4. EC. (2001). Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants.Google Scholar
  5. Vehmas, J., Kaivo-oja, J., Luukkanen, J., & Malaska, P. (1999). Environmental taxes on fuels and electricity – some experience from the Nordic countries. Energy Policy, 27(6), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. World Bank. (1999). Pollution prevention and abatement handbook: Toward cleaner production. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations