Advertisement

Deafness and Hearing Loss

  • Raja KushalnagarEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

People with hearing loss tend to use assistive and accessible technology differently from most other groups of people with disabilities, primarily due to the fact that their hearing loss influences their communication. As a result, their degree of hearing loss is but one of many aspects of their disability, which influences their preferred assistive or accessible technology. For example, for television programs, some viewers with hearing loss may prefer to turn up the volume, while others may prefer to read verbatim captions, and others prefer to follow the program with a sign language interpreter overlay. Because of these differences, designers and providers should strive to provide accessibility for people with hearing loss across multiple dimensions—hearing loss, legal requirements, communication and cultural preferences.

References

  1. Antia SD, Jones P, Luckner J, Kreimeyer KH, Reed S (2011) Social outcomes of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in general education classrooms. Except Child 77(4): 489–504. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/877027156?accountid=108Google Scholar
  2. Erickson W, Lee C, Von Schrader S (2013). Disability statistics from the 2011 american community survey (ACS)Google Scholar
  3. Fichten CS, Asuncion JV, Barile M, Ferraro V, Wolforth J (2009) Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. J Vis Impair Blind 103(9):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall WC, Levin LL, Anderson ML (2017) Language deprivation syndrome: a possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52(6):761–776.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1351-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C, Rathmann C (2014) Ensuring language acquisition for deaf children: What linguists can do. Language, 90(2).  https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Humphries T, Kushalnagar R, Mathur G, Napoli DJDJ, Padden C, Rathmann C, Smith S (2013) The right to language. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics 41(4):872–884.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kushalnagar P, Smith S, Hopper M, Ryan C, Rinkevich M, Kushalnagar RS (2016) Making cancer health text on the internet easier to read for deaf people who use american sign language. J Cancer Educ, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1059-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ladd P (2005) Deafhood: a concept stressing possibilities, not deficits. Scand J Public Health 33(66_suppl):12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14034950510033318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayberry RI, Lock E, Kazmi H (2002) Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature 417:38. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/417038aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell RE, Young TA, Bachleda B, Karchmer MA (2006) How many people use ASL in the United States? why estimates need updating. Sign Lang Stud 6(3):306–335.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2006.0019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moreland CJ, Latimore D, Sen A, Arato N, Zazove P (2013) Deafness among physicians and trainees: a national survey. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 88(2):224–232.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c0d60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Qi S, Mitchell RE (2012) Large-Scale Academic Achievement Testing of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Past, Present, and Future. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 17(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enr028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thurgood L, Golladay MJ, Hill ST (2006) U.S. Doctorates in the 20th CenturyGoogle Scholar
  14. United States Congress. Americans with Disabilities Act, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328, Pub. L. No. 104–328 (1990). United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization (2015) Deafness and Hearing Loss. N 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gallaudet UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations