Advertisement

Persona Writing

  • Lene NielsenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

When preparing persona descriptions, you need to keep in mind that they must be usable for the many different professional competencies that are involved in a project. This could be: The management group where the descriptions are used for strategic decisions about present and potential users. The project group who uses the personas for general decisions about the direction of the project. Designers, both those who design product features and those who design the shaping or graphics, who must be able to identify with the descriptions and use them for decisions on details. Finally, test managers who need the persona descriptions to recruit users for product tests. The many and varied usages create a number of requirements for the descriptions as well as considerations of the relationship between the personal descriptions that create empathy and the technical descriptions that give insights.

References

  1. Anvari F, Tran HM (2013) Persona ontology for user centered design professionals. In: Proceedings of the 4th ICIME, pp 35–44Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering: an experimental and social study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner J (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Caddick R, Cable S (2011) Communicating the user experience: a practical guide for creating useful UX documentation. WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll JM (2000) Making use—scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatman S (1990) Coming to terms—the rhetoric of narrative in fiction and film. Cornell University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum. SAMS, IndianapolisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D (2007) About face 3.0: the essentials of interaction design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Egri L (1960) The art of dramatic writing. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Eridon C (2012) 9 questions you need to ask when developing buyer personas. HubSpot blog. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018 from https://blog.nextinymarketing.com/9-questions-you-need-to-ask-when-developing-buyer-personas
  11. Floyd IR, Jones CM, Twidale MB (2008) Resolving incommensurable debates: a preliminary identification of persona kinds, attributes, and characteristics. Artifact 2(1):12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodmann E, Kuniavsky M, Moed A (2012) Observing the user experience a practitioner’s guide to user research, 2nd edn, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodwin K (2009) Designing for the Digital age: how to create human-centered products and services. WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Gothelf J, Seiden J (2013) Lean UX: applying lean principles to improve user experience. O’Reilly MediaGoogle Scholar
  15. Grudin J, Pruitt J (2002) Personas, participatory design and product development: an infra-structure for engagement. RUC, PDC, 2002. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Personas-%2C-Participatory-Design-and-Product-%3A-An-Grudin-Pruitt/09378fa1ddf5735fc5a190f4370370cd0e18db32
  16. Guerrato D (2017) UX persona for book app. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018 from https://dribbble.com/shots/3052941-UX-Persona-for-Book-App
  17. Hinton PR (2000) Stereotypes, cognition and culture. Psychology Press, East SussexGoogle Scholar
  18. Horton A (1999) Writing the character-centered screenplay. University of, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones M, Marsden G (2006) Mobile interaction design. WileyGoogle Scholar
  20. Jordan PW (2000) Designing pleasurable products. Taylor & Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jung CG (1971) Psychological types. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Khouri C (1990) Thelma & Louise. Final Shooting Script. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018 from http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Thelma-&-Louise.html
  23. Long F (2009) Real or imaginary—the effect of using personas in product design. In: IES conference, Dublin, Irish Ergonomics ReviewGoogle Scholar
  24. Mikkelson N, Lee WO (2000) Incorporating user archetypes into scenario-based design. UPA 2000, Usability Professionals AssociationGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulder S, Yaar Z (2006) The user is always right: a practical guide to creating and using personas for the web. New Riders PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulvad L (2015) Når brugeren får hovedrollen—et casestudie om personascenarier i anvendelse. Speciale ITUGoogle Scholar
  27. Negru S, Buraga S (2012) Towards a conceptual model for describing the personas methodology. In: Proceedings of the ICCP ’12, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen L (2005) Then the picture comes in your mind of what you have seen on TV—a study of personas descriptions and use. In The 5th Danish human-computer interaction research symposium. CBS, Department of Informatics, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen L (2008) Different cultures’ perception of personas descriptions. In Cultural Usability and Human Work Interaction Design—techniques that connects. In: Clemmensen T (ed) Proceedings from NordiCHI 2008 workshop. Department of Informatics, CBS. Working Paper nr 01-2008Google Scholar
  30. Nielsen L (2012) Personas user-focused design, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Nielsen L, Hansen KS, Stage J, Billestrup J (2015) A template for design personas: analysis of 47 persona descriptions from danish industries and organizations. Int J Sociotechnol Knowledge Development 7(1):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen L, Salminen J, Jung S-G, Kwak H, An J, Jansen BJ (2017) Who are your users? Comparing media professionals’ preconception of users to data-driven personas. In: OZCHI ‘17 proceedings of the 29th Australian conference on computer-human interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 602–606Google Scholar
  33. Nieters JE, Ivaturi S, Ahmed I (2007) Making personas memorable. CHI ‘07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. CA, USA, San Jose, pp 1817–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norman D (2004) Ad-hoc personas & empathetic focus. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018, from https://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/adhoc_personas_em.html
  35. Nünning A (2001) On the perspective structure of narrative texts: steps toward a constructivist narratology. In: Van Peer WC, Chatman S (eds) New perspectives on narrative perspective. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 207–223Google Scholar
  36. Persona development discussion guide. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018, from https://www.usability.gov/sites/default/files/persona-development-discussion-guide.docx
  37. Pichler R (2012) A template for writing great personas. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018 from http://www.romanpichler.com/blog/persona-template-for-agile-product-management/
  38. Pruitt J, Adlin T (2006) The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. Quesenbury W, Brooks K (2010) Storytelling for user experience: crafting stories for better design. Rosenfeld MediaGoogle Scholar
  40. Salminen JN, Jung S-G, An J, Kwak H, Jansen BJ (2018) ‘Is More Better?’: impact of multiple photos on perception of persona profiles. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, p 317Google Scholar
  41. Schutz A, Luckmann T (1973) The structures of the life-world. Northern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith M (1995) Engaging characters: fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner P, Turner S (2011) Is stereotyping inevitable when designing with personas. Des Stud 32:30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vorre Hansen A (2009) Personas nu og fremover. Retrieved 24 Sept 2018, from http://personas.dk/?p=155

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business ITIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations