• Theodore T. AllenEmail author


In this chapter, six sigma is defined as a method for problem solving. It is perhaps true that the main benefits of six sigma are: (1) the method slows people down when they solve problems, preventing them from prematurely jumping to poor recommendations that lose money; and (2) six sigma forces people to evaluate quantitatively and carefully their proposed recommendations. These evaluations can aid by encouraging adoption of project results and in the assignment of credit to participants.


  1. Bloom BS (ed) (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives. In: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Clausing D (1994) Total quality development: a step-by-step guide to world-class concurrent engineering. ASME Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins J (2001) Good to great: why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. Harper-Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Czitrom V (1999) One-factor-at-a-time versus designed experiments. Am Stat 53(2):126–131Google Scholar
  5. Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Hahn GJ, Hill WJ, Hoer RW, Zinkgraft SA (1999) The impact of six sigma improvement—a glimpse into the future of statistics. Am Stat 532:208–215Google Scholar
  7. Harry MJ, Schroeder R (1999) Six sigma, the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Bantam Doubleday Dell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Hazelrigg G (1996) System engineering: an approach to information-based design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaynak H (2003) The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J Oper Manag 21:405–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Zaheer S, Choo AS (2003) Six sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manag 21:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Montgomery DC (2012) Statistical quality control, 7th edn. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Pande PS, Neuman RP, Cavanagh R (2000) The six sigma way: how GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Taguchi G (1993) Taguchi methods: research and development. In: Konishi S (ed) Quality engineering series, vol 1. The American Supplier Institute, Livonia, MIGoogle Scholar
  14. Welch J, Welch S (2005) Winning. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Womack JP, Jones DT (1996) Lean thinking. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world: the story of lean production. Harper-Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial and Systems EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations