Long Term Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Effect of Implant Fixation (Cementless)

Chapter

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful operations performed with 95–98 good to excellent results reported at 10–15 years follow up [1]. When it comes to fixation of components the technique can be cemented, cementless or hybrid (cementless femoral and cemented tibial components) [2, 3]. Cemented fixation has resulted in satisfactory long term outcome with low revision rates (Fig. 16.1) [2–5]. However, osteolysis often appears and the long term durability of the interface is questionable, especially in young patients [6, 7].

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty Aseptic Loosening Tibial Component Tibial Tray Cement Fixation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim YH, Park JW, Lim HM, Park ES. Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty years. Which is better? Int Orthop. 2014;38:297–303.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer TW, Schills J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. I: mechanisms of implant fixation. Skelet Radiol. 1999;28:423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lombardi Jr AV, Berasi CC, Berend KR. Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4S1):25–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty: current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop. 1992;276:26–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gicquel P, Kempf JF, Gastaud F, Schlemmer B, Bonnomet F. Comparative study of fixation mode in total knee arthroplasty with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:240–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:53–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior cruciate substituting total knee design: five to eight year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84A:1362–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman MA, McLeod HC, Levai JP. Cementless fixation of prosthetic components in total arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Clin Orthop. 1983;176:88–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman MA, Tennant R. The scientific basis of cement versus cementless fixation. Clin Orthop. 1992;276:19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassett RW. Results of 1000 performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:409–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(3):193–7. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meneghini RM, Hanen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. J Knee Surg. 2008;21:307–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nolan JF, Bucknill TM. Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1992;74B:23–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berry DJ, Wold LE, Rand JA. Extensive osteolysis around septic, stable, uncemented total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1993;293:204–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albrektsson BE, Carlsson LV, Freeman MS, Herberts P, Ryd L. Proximally cemented versus cementless Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1992;74B:233–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gioe TJ, Killeen K, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:100–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Callaghan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;271:1349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:315–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Epinette JA, Nanley MT. Hydroxyapatite coated total knee replacement: clinical experience at 10 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89B:34–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown TE, Harper BL, Bjorgul K. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2013;36:380–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Efe T, Figiel J, Danek S, Tibesku CO, Paleta JR, Skwara A. Initial stability of tibial components in primary knee arthroplasty. A cadaver study comparing cemented and cementless fixation techniques. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:320–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Maheshwari A, Harwin SF. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):369–76.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M, Abolghasemian M, Sternheim A, Cameron HU. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams – opposes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94B(11SA):85–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ranawat CS, Meftah M, Windsor EN, Ranawat AS. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams – affirms. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94B(11SA):82–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berger RA, Lyon JH, Jacobs JJ, Barden RM, Berkson EM, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years follow up. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:196–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1998;356:66–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moran CG, Pinder IM, Lees TA, Midwinter MJ. Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous coated anatomic knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73A:848–57.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whiteside LA. Effect of porous coating configuration on tibial osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1995;321:92–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP, Camargo MP. Ten to 14 year clinical follow up of the cementless natural knee system. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:85–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whiteside LA. Cementless total knee replacement. Nine to 11 year results and 10 year survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1994;309:185–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watanabe H, Akizuki S, Takizawa T. Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2004;86A:824–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buechel FF, Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J. Twenty year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:41–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ritter MA, Meneghini RM. Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:507–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eriksen J, Christensen J, Solgaard S, Schrøder H. The cementless AGC 2000 knee prosthesis: 20-year results in a consecutive series. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75(2):225–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP, et al. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80B:971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Morris RW, Gregg PJ. A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2002;84B:658–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baker PN, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Esler CN, Gregg PJ. A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89B:1608–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2009;91B:889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Efstathopoulos N, Mavrogenis AF, Lallos S, Nikolaou V, Papagelopoulos PJ, Savvidou OD, Korres DS. 10-year evaluation of the cementless low contact stress rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants. 2009;19:255–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chana R, Shenava Y, Nicholl AP, Lusted FJ, Skinner PW, Gibb PA. Five- to 8-year results of the uncemented Duracon total knee arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:677–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hardeman F, Vandenneucker H, Van Lauwe J, Bellemans J. Cementless total knee arthroplasty with Profix: a 8- to 10-year follow-up study. Knee. 2006;13(6):419–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Choy WS, Yang DS, Lee KW, Lee SK, Kim KJ, Chang SH. Cemented versus cementless fixation of a tibial component in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(12):2397–401.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Doble J, Stronach BM, Peters CL. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty revisited: midterm follow up of hybrid versus cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:854871.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto Ode A, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD006193. ReviewGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Soballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;255:S1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Soballe K, Ovegaard S. The current status of Hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1996;78B:689–91.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gejo R, Akizuki S, Takizawa T. Fixation of the NexGen HA-TCP coated cementless, screwless total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same type. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:449–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bunger C. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75B:270–8.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:681–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Carlsson A, Björkman A, Besjakov J, Onsten I. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2005;76(3):362–9.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Voigt JD, Mosier M. Hydroxyapatite(HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2011;82:448–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Uvehammer J, Karrholm J, Carlsson L. Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral component of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement: a radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89B:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nilsson KG, Karrholm J, Carlsson AS, Dalen T. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomised comparison of hydroxyapatite coated and cemented tibial components with five year follow up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplast. 1999;14:9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87B:1073–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nilsson KG, Henricson A, Norgren B, Dalén T. Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient. Clin Orthop. 2006;448:129–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88B:1158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Beaupré LA, al-Yamani M, Huckell JR, Johnston DW. Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A:2204–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Azboy I, Demitras A, Bulut M, Ozturkmen Y, Sukur E, Caniklioglu M. Long term results of porous coated cementless total knee arthroplasty with screw fixation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47:347–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Banerjee S, Kulesha G, Kester M, Mont MA. Emerging technologies in arthroplasty: additive manufacturing. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(3):185–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1999;81B:907–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Normand X, Pinçon JL, Ragot JM, Verdier R, Aslanian T. Prospective study of the cementless “New Wave” total knee mobile-bearing arthroplasty: 8-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(2):349–54.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Helm AT, Kerin C, Ghalayini SR, McLauchlan GJ. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:941–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kamath AF, Lee GC, Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Garino JP, Israelite CL. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1390–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fernandez-Fairen M, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Murcia A, Torres A, Llopis R. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Orthop. 2013;471:3543–53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press fit condylar posterior cruciate substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83A:398–403.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Harwin SF, Kester MA, Malkani AL, Manley MT. Excellent fixation achieved with cementless posteriorly stabilised total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jackson MP, Sexton SA, Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat BA. The impact of obesity on the mid-term outcome of cementless total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2009;91:1044–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Whiteside LA, Viganò R. Young and heavy patients with a cementless TKA do as well as older and lightweight patients. Clin Orthop. 2007;464:93–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Woo YK, Kim KW, Chung JW, Lee HS. Average 10.1-year follow-up of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Can J Surg. 2011;54(3):179–84.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kamath S, Chang W, Shaari E, Bridges A, Campbell A, McGill P. Comparison of peri-prosthetic bone density in cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(3):354–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM. Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88B:606–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sorrells RB, Murphy JA, Sheridan KC, Wasielewski RC. The effect of varus and valgus deformity on results of cementless mobile bearing TKA. Knee. 2007;14(4):284–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cooke C, Walter WK, Zicat B. Tibial fixation without screws in cementless total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(2):237–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ferguson RP, Friederichs MG, Hofmann AA. Comparison of screw and screwless fixation in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008;31(2):127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chong DY, Hansen UN, Amis AA. Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions. J Biomech. 2010;43(6):1074–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bhimji S, Meneghini RM. Micromotion of cementless tibial baseplates under physiological loading conditions. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(4):648–54.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stilling M, Madsen F, Odgaard A, Rømer L, Andersen NT, Rahbek O, Søballe K. Superior fixation of pegged trabecular metal over screw-fixed pegged porous titanium fiber mesh: a randomized clinical RSA study on cementless tibial components. Acta Orthop Scand. 2011;82(2):177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Schepers A, Cullingworth L, van der Jagt DR. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing tibial baseplate fixation with or without screws in total knee arthroplasty a radiographic evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):454–60.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Galloway F, Kahnt M, Ramm H, Worsley P, Zachow S, Nair P, Taylor M. A large scale finite element study of a cementless osseointegrated tibial tray. J Biomech. 2013;46(11):1900–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bhimji S, Meneghini RM. Micromotion of cementless tibial baseplates: keels with adjuvant pegs offer more stability than pegs alone. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1503–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Maloney WJ. Cementless and cemented implants had similar survival in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):973.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health SciencesUniversity of Thessalia, CERETETH, University General Hospital of LarissaLarissaHellenic Republic
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Department, Center of Biomedical Sciences (CERETETH)University of ThessaliaLarissaHellenic Republic
  3. 3.Orthopaedic Department, Center of Biomedical Sciences (CERETETH)University General Hospital of LarissaLarissaHellenic Republic

Personalised recommendations