Advertisement

Visualizing Uncertainty in Predictive Models

  • Penny RheingansEmail author
  • Marie desJardins
  • Wallace Brown
  • Alex Morrow
  • Doug Stull
  • Kevin Winner
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)

Abstract

Predictive models are used in many fields to characterize relationships between the attributes of an instance and its classification. While these models can provide valuable support to decision-making, they can be challenging to understand and evaluate. While they provide predicted classifications, they do not generally include indications of confidence in those predictions. Typical quality measures for predictive models are the percentage of predictions which are made correctly. These measures can give some insight into how often the model is correct, but provide little help in understanding under what conditions the model performs well (or poorly). We present a framework for improving understanding of predictive models based on the methods of both machine learning and data visualization. We demonstrate this framework on models that use attributes about individuals in a census data set to predict other attributes of those individuals.

Keywords

True Class Input Attribute Dimension Reduction Method Dimension Reduction Technique Income Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This preliminary work was supported by NSF EAGER #1050168 and by NSF REU Supplement #1129683. Thanks to David Mann for his contribution to the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Assa, J., Cohen-Or, D., Milo, T.: Displaying data in multidimensional relevance space with 2D visualization maps. In: IEEE Visualization ’97, pp. 127–134. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, D.C. (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cedilnik, A., Rheingans, P.: Procedural annotation of uncertain information. In: Proceedings of IEEE Visualization ’00, pp. 77–84 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cox, T., Cox, M.: Multidimensional Scaling. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall, London (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, T.J., Keller, C.P.: Modelling and visualizing multiple spatial uncertainties. Comput. Geosci. 23(4), 397–408 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hagh-Shenas, H., Kim, S., Interrante, V., Healey, C.: Weaving versus blending: a quantitative assessment of information carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 13(6), 1270–1277 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, C., Sanderson, A.: A next step: visualizing errors and uncertainty. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23(5), 6–10 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joshi, A.: Art-inspired techniques for visualizing time-varying data. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohavi, R., Becker, B.: Adult data set (1994). Available online from UCI Machine Learning Repository: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Adult
  10. 10.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-organizing Maps. Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacEachren, A.M., Robinson, A., Hopper, S., Gardner, S., Murray, R., Gahegan, M., Hetzler, E.: Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: what we know and what we need to know. Cartograph. Geograph. Inf. Sci. 32, 139–160 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pang, A., Wittenbrink, C., Lodha, S.: Approaches to uncertainty visualization. Visual Comput. 13, 370–390 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rushmeier, H., Lawrence, R., Almasi, G.: Case study: Visualizing customer segmentations produced by self organizing maps. In: IEEE Visualization 97, pp. 463–466. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, D.C. (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanyal, J., Zhang, S., Bhattacharya, G., Amburn, P., Moorhead, R.J.: A user study to compare four uncertainty visualization methods for 1D and 2D datasets. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 15(6), 1209–1218 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Penny Rheingans
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marie desJardins
    • 1
  • Wallace Brown
    • 1
  • Alex Morrow
    • 1
  • Doug Stull
    • 1
  • Kevin Winner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations