Advertisement

Using Compendium as a Tool to Support the Design of Learning Activities

  • Gráinne Conole
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)

Abstract

This chapter describes how a mind mapping tool, Compendium, is being used to help designers and teachers create and share learning activities. Initial evaluation of the use of the tool for learning design has been positive; users report that it is easy to use and helps them organize and articulate their learning designs. Importantly the tool also enables them to share and discuss their design strategies. The chapter will ground this work within the wider literature on learning design, focusing in particular on how learning activities can be represented and mechanisms for supporting decision making in creating new learning activities.

Keywords

Design Process Learning Activity Compendium Tool Learning Design Mind Mapping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work described in this chapter is part of an institutional project on learning design. Others involved include: Stewart Nixon, Peter Wilson, Martin Weller, Simon Cross and Mary Thorpe.

References

  1. Alexander, B. (2006), Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause review, 41(2): 32–44.Google Scholar
  2. Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (Eds) (2007), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  3. Conole, G. (2007), Describing learning activities: tools and resources to guide practice, in H. Beetham and R. Sharpe (Eds), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  4. Conole, G. (2008), Capturing practice: the role of mediating artefacts in learning design, in L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, and B. Harper (Eds), Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies.Google Scholar
  5. Conole, G. and Fill, K. (2005), A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities, JIME, 8. www-jime.open.ac.uk/2005/08/> [28/08/06].Google Scholar
  6. Conole, G. and Oliver, M. (Eds.) (2007), Contemporary Perspectives in e-Learning Research: Themes, Tensions and Impact on Practice, Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  7. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Darby, J. and Dillon, T. (2006), An in-depth case study of students’ experiences of e-learning – how is learning changing? Final report of the JISC-funded LXP Learning Experiences Study project, Milton Keynes: Open University, www.jisc.ac.uk/mdia/documents/programmes/elearning_pedagogy/lxp%20project%20final%20report%20 dec%2006.pdf [20/04/07.Google Scholar
  8. Conole, G., deLaat, M., Dillon, T. and Darby, J. (2008), Disruptive technologies, pedagogical innovation: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology, Computers and Education, 50(2).Google Scholar
  9. Conole, G., Oliver, M., Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A. and Harvey, J. (2007a), Designing for learning, in G. Conole and M. Oliver (Eds), Contemporary Perspectives in E-Learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice, part of the Open and Distance Learning Series, F. Lockwood (Ed), RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  10. Conole, G., Thorpe, M., Weller, M., Wilson, P., Nixon, S. and Grace, P. (2007b), Capturing practice and scaffolding learning design, Paper accepted for the EDEN conference, June, Naples.Google Scholar
  11. Creanor, L., Trinder, K., Gowan, D. and Howells, C. (2006), LEX – The Learning Experience Project, Final report of the JISC-funded LEX project, Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.Google Scholar
  12. Downes, S. (2006), E-learning 2.0, eLearning magazine: education and technology in perspective, http://elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1 [20/04/07].Google Scholar
  13. Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A. and de Freitas, S. (2007), Learning theories and their application to e-learning, in G. Conole and M. Oliver (ed), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice, part of the Open and Distance Learning Series, F. Lockwood (ed), RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  14. Falconer, I. and Conole, G. (2006), LADIE gap analysis, report for the JISC-funded LADIE project, available online at http://www.elframework.org/refmodels/ladie/guides/LADiE% 20Gap%20Analysis.doc [22/02/07].Google Scholar
  15. Falconer, I., Beetham, H., Oliver, R., Lockyer, L., and Littlejohn, A. (2007), Mod4L – final report: representing learning designs, Final report for the JISC-funded MOD4L project, Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.Google Scholar
  16. Fill, K., Conole, G. and Bailey, C. (2008, in press), A toolkit to guide the design of effective learning activities, in P. Rees, L. Mackay, K. Fill and H. Durham (Eds), E-Learning for Geographers, Idea Group Inc.: Hersey, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  17. Goodyear, P. (2005), Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages & design practice, AJET 21.1, 82–101, www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html [27/1/07].Google Scholar
  18. Jeffery, A., Conole, G. and Falconer, I. (2006), LADIE Project Final Report, Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  19. Okada, A. and Buckingham Shum, S. (2006), ‘Knowledge mapping with Compendium in academic research and online education’ 22nd ICDE World Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/osc/docs/KnowledgeMapping_ICDE2006.pdf
  20. TELL (2005), Design patterns for teachers and educational (system) designers, Pattern book, output of WP3, TELL project, available online at http://cosy.ted.unipi.gr/TELL/media/TELL_pattern_book.pdf [20/04/07].Google Scholar
  21. Thorpe, M. and Godwin, S. (2006), Interaction and e-learning: the student experience, Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), pp. 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thorpe, M., Godwin, S. and Ferguson, R. (2007), Technoloiges in use: how context and design drive their effects, Paper Accepted for the EDEN Conference, June, Naples.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, P. (2007), Progress report on capturing eLearning case studies, Internal report, The Open University: Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, P., Grace, P., Thorpe, M. (2007), Presentation at the CTSS Conference, The Open University, 1–2nd May.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of Educational TechnologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations