Cloud Computing pp 273-292

Part of the Computer Communications and Networks book series (CCN) | Cite as

An Assessment Tool to Prepare the Leap to the Cloud

  • Leire Orue-Echevarria
  • Marisa Escalante
  • Juncal Alonso


To keep software compatible and optimal with respect to the latest trends is not easy. Nearly 90 % of the software cost can be due to maintenance, and approximately 75 % of it is spent on developing new features to stay functionally competitive and relevant. The industry progresses through periods of incremental development interspersed with true paradigm shifts, and, therefore, legacy software must keep up the pace. However, software modernization is not a trivial issue, and, if improperly done, it dangers the business continuity and sustainability. Companies considering transition to the new paradigm of cloud computing need to have available an innovative and combined technical and business analysis on the maturity and prospect of the legacy application. This chapter presents an approach for assessing the maturity of these applications and the convenience of migrating to the new cloud paradigm. Two issues are taken into account: on one hand, the perspectives in terms of technical challenges, maturity, and effort of the migration are identified; on the other, the performance and business benefits in relation to the cost of the process are pre-evaluated before tackling the actual migration process. Perhaps, for the first time, the business value is directly attached to the technical performance.


Migration to cloud Maturity assessment Feasibility analysis Cloud modernization Legacy software Multitenancy Scalability 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Wu, B., Lawless, D., Bisbal, J., Grimson, J., Wade, V., O’Sullivan, D., et al.: Legacy systems migration – a method and its tool-kit framework. In: The Proceedings of the Joint 1997 IEEE Asian-Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference (APSEC’97/ICSC’97), Hong Kong, China. December, 1997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khusidman, V., Ulrich, W.: Architecture-Driven Modernization: Transforming the Enterprise. OMG. Retrieved in October 2011 (2007)
  4. 4.
    Warren, I., Ransom, J.: Renaissance: a method to support software system evolution. Paper presented at the 26th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oxford, UK, pp. 415–420 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5. Retrieved in October 2011
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    REMICS consortium: D2.2-REMICS Methodology (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simon, F., Seng, O., Mohaut, T.: Code-quality-management. Dpunkt. Verlag, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design. In: Proceedings of OOPSLA’91, pp. 197–211. ACM, New York (1991).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, W., Henry, S.: Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability. J. Syst. Softw. 23(2), 111–122 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, Y.S., Liang, B S., Wu, S.F., Wang, F.J.: Measuring the coupling and cohesion of an object-oriented program based on information flow. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Quality, Maribor (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18. Project Number IPT-2011-1558-430000. Retrieved in October 2011
  19. 19. Retrieved in October 2012

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leire Orue-Echevarria
    • 1
  • Marisa Escalante
    • 1
  • Juncal Alonso
    • 1
  1. 1.TECNALIA ICT – European Software Institute DivisionParque Tecnológico Ed. #202Zamudio-BizkaiaSpain

Personalised recommendations