New Frontiers for Computer Ethics: Virtualization and Virtual Reality

  • Joseph Migga Kizza
Part of the Texts in Computer Science book series (TCS)


This chapter discusses the new developments and consequences of the virtualization technology and its implications on our participation and how the technology informs our behavior based on our traditional moral and ethical values. In a more detailed way, we define virtualization as a process which embodies both abstraction and reconstruction and as it creates a sense of complete participants’ immersion yet with autonomy of participants to vary their chosen new environments to suit individual likings. As defined, virtualization, therefore, conjures uncertainty and fear not of the environment but of the individual who partakes in the activities of the environment. Our discussion of both social and ethical issues that arise within and outside the environment focused on two types of virtualization: computing resources virtualization and virtual reality (VR). We note that virtualization is also bringing about easy creation of new human identities in the new virtual environments which makes authentication more difficult but at the same time creating unprecedented potential in self-creation and self-presentation. We note, however, that while these benefits may bring new opportunities and new potential that may empower individuals to new levels of creativity, these unparalleled opportunities of virtualization may come at a price to society.


Virtual Reality Virtual Machine Virtual Environment Physical Machine Virtual Reality Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    VMware.comGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mullins R (2012) Virtualization tops CIO priorities in 2012: IDC savings from server consolidation will go to new IT innovations, IDC says. Information Week, 11 January, 2012.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Workstation virtualization featuring VMware workstation 7.0/7.1.
  7. 7.
    Kartheek Virtualization technology.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Singh G, Feiner S, Thalmann D (1996) Virtual reality: software and technology. Commun ACM 39(5):35–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryson S (1996) Virtual reality in scientific visualization. Commun ACM 39(5):62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maes P (1995) Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike automous agents. Commun ACM 38(11):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bayani S, Fernandez M, Pevez M (1996) Virtual reality for driving simulation. Commun ACM 39(5):72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The handbook of research for educational communications and technology.
  14. 14.
    Beardon C (1992) The ethics of virtual reality. Intell Tutor Media 3(1):22–28MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Purser RE Virtualization of consciousness or conscious virtualization: what path will virtual reality take?∼rpurser/revised/pages/iabddoc.htm
  16. 16.
    Wikipedia. Phenomenology, ethics and the virtual world. Technoethics.
  17. 17.
    Gruman G (2008) Virtualization’s secret security threats: virtualization can be both a blessing and a curse, serving up improved security while at the same time hiding dangers. InfoWorld, 13 March, 2008,.,0
  18. 18.
    Shackleford D (2010) An introduction to virtualization security. SANS-Tuesday, 9 March 2010. Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Vickers DL (1972) Sorcerer’s apprentice: head–mounted display and wand. In: Bist JA, Hast HL (eds) A symposium on visually coupled systems: development and applications. AMD, TR 73–1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Migga Kizza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of TennesseeChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations