A Comparison of Methods to Detect and Quantitate PFO: TCD, TTE, ICE and TEE
At the present time, the diagnosis of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is based on either imaging of the interatrial septal anatomy that allows direct visualization of the septal defect transesophageal echo [TEE], transthoracic echo [TTE], intracardiac echo [ICE], or by physiologic quantification of the right-to-left shunt (RLS) through the PFO using transcranial Doppler [TCD]. Contrast TEE is currently the standard technique for identifying a PFO and visualization of the atrial septal anatomy. TEE permits an assessment of PFO size, RLS severity and differentiation between an intracardiac and intrapulmonary RLS. A TTE bubble study is the most commonly used imaging modality for the detection of PFO. Though cost-effective and readily available, TTE has a low sensitivity with poor differentiating ability between cardiac and pulmonary RLS. ICE allows detailed visualization of the inter-atrial septum at a resolution comparable to that of TEE. TCD is a highly sensitive test for indirectly assessing the presence of a RLS; some studies report a sensitivity higher than that of TEE but a lower specificity due to TCD’s inability to differentiate between cardiac and pulmonary shunts. This chapter will compare the different techniques and describe the benefits and drawbacks of the various imaging options.
KeywordsTransesophageal echo Transthoracic echo Transcranial Doppler Intracardiac echo right-to-left shunt
Positive bubble study in a patient with pulmonary shunt (X-plane) (AVI 7474 kb)
Positive bubble study in a patient with pulmonary shunt (LA view) (AVI 15840 kb)
Negative bubble study, bicaval view (AVI 13328 kb)
Hypermobile septum on TEE (X plane) (AVI 2328 kb)
PFO closure device image in 3-D (AVI 2360 kb)
Transthoracic echocardiography in a 33-year old patient suffering from severe migraine with visual aura (apical four-chamber view) (AVI 3510 kb)
- 9.Kühl HP, Hoffmann R, Merx MW, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging: diagnostic alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of atrial right to left shunt in patients with cerebral embolic events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(6):1823–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Pfleger S, Konstantin Haase K, Stark S, et al. Haemodynamic quantification of different provocation manoeuvres by simultaneous measurement of right and left atrial pressure: implications for the echocardiographic detection of persistent foramen ovale. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2001;2:88–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Marriott K, Manins V, Forshaw A, Wright J, Pascoe R. Detection of right-to-left atrial communication using agitated saline contrast imaging: experience with 1162 patients and recommendations for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(1):96–102Google Scholar
- 34.Mojadidi MK, Winoker JS, Roberts SC, Msaouel P, Zaman MO, Gevorgyan R, Tobis JM. Accuracy of conventional transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of intracardiac right-to-left shunt: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Echocardiography. 2014 Apr 2. doi: 10.1111/echo.12583. [epub ahead of print].
- 38.Mojadidi MK, Winoker JS, Roberts SC, Msaouel P, Gevorgyan R, Zolty. Two-dimensional echocardiography using second harmonic imaging for the diagnosis of intracardiac right-to-left shunt: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(5):911–23.Google Scholar
- 40.Topol TJ. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 2007 (355); ch 79. p. 1283.Google Scholar