Informatics and Management Science V pp 273-280 | Cite as
Research of Virtual Tour Impact on Destination Image
Abstract
Although virtual reality (VR) has been well known and investigated for practical use in various industrial fields after late 1980s and 1990s, it is recently that researchers and practitioners in the tourism field have attempted to understand the virtual tour. Few researches have been done to understand the role of destination image and to examine the impact that virtual tour has on the destination image. The purpose of this paper is to empirically elaborate the relationship between the virtual tour and tourists’ destination image under the context that applied VR technology. This study takes Shanghai Online-Expo as a case and participants either do or don’t have expo-exhibition experiences are all recruited from the Zhejiang University. Virtual tour is expected to positively affect the destination image, and furthermore, it is also significant among tourists’ without destination experience, and vice versa. These results have both managerial and theoretical implication.
Keywords
Virtual reality Virtual tour VR technology Shanghai online-expoReferences
- 1.Al-Kodmany K (2002) Visualization tools and methods in community planning: from freehand sketches to virtual reality. J Plann Lit 17(2):189–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ban˜os RM, Botella C, Alcan˜iz M, Lian˜o V, Guerrero B, Rey B (2004) Immersion and emotion: their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology Behav 7(6):734–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bishop ID, Wherrett JR, Miller DR (2001) Assessment of path choices on a country walks using a virtual environment. Landscape Urban Plann 52:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Buhalis D (2003) ETourism: information technology for strategic tourism management, vol 4. Prentice Hall, Toronto, pp 174–179Google Scholar
- 5.Buhalis D, Law R (2008) Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the internetdthe state of eTourism research. Tourism Management 29(4):609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Burdea GC, Coiffet P (2003) Virtual reality technology, 2nd edn, vol 21. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, pp 456–459Google Scholar
- 7.Caneparo L (2001) Shared virtual reality for design and management: the porta susa project. Autom Constr 10:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cheong R (1995) The virtual threat to travel and tourism. Tourism Management 16(6):417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Guttentag DA (2010) Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management 31:637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dinh HQ, Walker N, Song C, Kobayashi A, Hodges LF (1999) Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. Proceedings of IEEE virtual reality, vol 15. pp 222–228Google Scholar
- 11.Foxlin, E (2002) Motion tracking requirements and technologies. In: Stanney K (ed) Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications, vol 12. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 163–210Google Scholar
- 12.Gaitatzes A, Christopoulos D, Roussou M (2001) Reviving the past: cultural heritage meets virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2001 conference on virtual reality, archaeology, and cultural heritage, vol 34. ACM Press, 103–110Google Scholar
- 13.Gutierrez M, Vexo F, Thalmann D (2008) Stepping into virtual reality, vol 7. Springer, London, pp 546–549Google Scholar
- 14.Heldal I (2007) Supporting participation in planning new roads by using virtual reality systems. Virtual Reality 11:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lee O, Oh J-E (2007) The impact of virtual reality functions of a hotel website on travel anxiety. Cyberpsychology Behav 10(4):584–586MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) A crossmedia presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence-Teleoper Virtual Environ 10:282–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Meehan M, Razzaque S, Whitton MC, Brooks FP Jr (2003) Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE virtual reality, vol 22, pp 141–148Google Scholar