Building Simulation

  • Runming YaoEmail author
  • David Lim


This chapter aims to provide an overview of building simulation in a theoretical and practical context. The following sections demonstrate the importance of simulation programs at a time when society is shifting toward a low carbon future and the practice of sustainable design becomes mandatory. The initial sections acquaint the reader with basic terminology and comment on the capabilities and categories of simulation tools before discussing the historical development of programs. The main body of the chapter considers the primary benefits and users of simulation programs, looks at the role of simulation in the construction process, and examines the validity and interpretation of simulation results. The latter half of the chapter looks at program selection and discusses software capability, product characteristics, input data, and output formats. The inclusion of a case study demonstrates the simulation procedure and key concepts. Finally, the chapter closes with a insight into the future, commenting on the development of simulation capability, user interfaces, and how simulation will continue to empower building professionals as society faces new challenges in a rapidly changing landscape. Learning outcomes: On successful completion of this chapter, readers will be able to: (1) Understand the benefits of building simulation tools and how they function within a construction process context; (2) Grasp the basic functionality, capability and range of simulation programs, and how best to select them; (3) Appreciate the key user categories and the benefits they can gain from using tools; (4) Comprehend the limitations and uncertainties of simulation results; and (5) Gain insight into how simulation tools have developed over time and how they might evolve in the future.


Building simulation tools Energy performance Modeling Simulation programs 


  1. ASHRAE (1997) ASHRAE Handbook of fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers Inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  2. ASSOHQE (2010) Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE) (high quality environmental) assessment method. Association pour la Haute Qualité Environnementale (ASSOHQE), Paris, France.
  3. Augenbroe G (2002) Trends in building simulation. Build Environ 37:891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beausoleil-Morrison I (2001) An algorithm for calculating convection coefficients for internal building surfaces for the case of mixed flow in room. Energy Build 3(4):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BRE (2009) BREEAM: the environmental assessment method for buildings around the world. BRE Global Ltd, WatfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, Griffith BT (2008) Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Build Environ 43:661–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Degelman L (1999) A model for simulation of daylighting and occupancy sensors as an energy control strategy for office buildings. In: Proceedings of building simulation ‘99, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  8. DIAL Europe, European integrated daylighting design tool.
  9. DoE (2012) Building energy software tools directory. US Department of Energy, Washington, USA. Accessed 3 Mar 2012
  10. Feist W, Schniedersa J, Dorerb V, Haas A (2005) Re-inventing air heating: convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept. Energy Build 37:1186–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GBCA (2012) Green star. Green Building Council Australia, Sydney, Australia.
  12. GeSBC (2012) Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen e.V.(DGNB) Stuttgart, German Sustainable Building Council (GeSBC), Germany.
  13. Hoes P, Hensen JLM, Loomans M, Vries B, de Bourgeois D (2009) User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy Build 41:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong T, Chou SK, Bong TY (2000) Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources. Build Environ 35:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. International Standards Organization (1987) ISO 9000 Quality management and quality assurance standards. International Standards Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. JaGBC (2011) Comprehensive assessment system for building environmental efficiency (CASBEE). Japan Green Building Council (JaGBC), Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC), Tokyo, Japan.
  17. Jentsch MF, Bahaj AS, James PAB (2008) Climate change future proofing of buildings—generation and assessment of building simulation weather files. Energy Build 40(12):2148–2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lim D, Yao R (2011) A model of UK domestic appliance use using Artificial Neural Networks. The AEIC annual load research conference, Alexandria, Virginia, USA 7–10 Aug 2011Google Scholar
  19. Lutzenhiser L (1987) Social variation and electricity consumption in San Diego, California: exploratory data analysis and the California energy commission’s electricity demand forecasting model, UER-196. University of California Energy Research Group, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitalas GP, Stephenson DG (1967) Room thermal response factors. ASHRAE Trans 73:1Google Scholar
  21. Morbitzer CA (2003) Towards the integration of simulation into the building design process, PhD Thesis, Energy System Research Unit Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Strathclyde, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Natural Resources Canada (1997) Energy audit software directory 1997. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  23. Persimmons (2009) The Glastonbury Home. Persimmon Plc. (South West Division), York, UK.
  24. RIBA (2008) Outline plan of work 2007. Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Portland Place, London, UK. Accessed 12 Oct 2011
  25. Sherman WR, Craig A (2009) Understanding virtual reality: interface, application and design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. Shipworth D (2010) The vernacular architecture of household energy models. modelling in the social sciences: interdisciplinary comprison. Helsinki collegium for advanced studies, 17–18 June 2010Google Scholar
  27. Sowell EF, Hittle DC (1995) Evolution of building energy simulation methodology. ASHRAE Trans 101(1):850–855Google Scholar
  28. TERI (2012) Green rating for integrated habitat assessment (GRIHA). The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Delhi, India.
  29. USGBC (2010) Leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) green building rating system. US Green Building Council, Washington.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Construction Management and EngineeringThe University of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations