A Bi-level Multiobective Optimization Model for Risk Management to Utilize Wastes in Stone Industry under Fuzzy Environment

  • Abid Hussain Nadeem
  • Muhammad Hashim
  • Muhammad Nazim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 185)

Abstract

Control and management of waste materials created during stone production is one of the most important problems of stone industry and modern societies today. Waste materials which are different depending on properties of structure and construction technique generally consist of materials such as concrete, brick, stone, briquette, wood, metal, glass, gypsum, plastic, ceramic [1]. This paper is about how to optimize the stone industry. The plant considered as the leader level will make a strategy to utilize the wastes amount for waste department. The waste department considered as the follower level will make a decision to produce different stone products under the utilizing constraint. Due to the lack of historical data, some emission coefficients are considered as fuzzy numbers.Therefore, a bi-level multiobjective optimization model with possibilistic constraints are developed to get the maximum profit and control the pollution. At the end, a case study is proposed to show the efficiency of the proposed model.

Keywords

Bi-level multi-objective programming Possibilistic constraint Waste utilization in stone industry Fuzzy simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Altuncua D, Kasapsekina M (2011) Management and recycling of constructional solid waste in Turkey. In: International Conference on Green Buildings and Sustainable CitiesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aukour F, Al-Qinna M (2008) Marble production and environmental constrains: Case study from Zarqa Governorate, Jordan. Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 1:11–21Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yao LM, Xu JP (2012) A stone resource assignment model under the fuzzy environment.Mathematical Problems in Engineering (accepted)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nasserdine K, Mimi Z, Bevan B et al (2009) Environmental management of the stone cutting industry. Journal of Environmental Management 90:466–470Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corinaldesi V, Moriconi G, Naik TR (2010) Naik characterization of marble powder for its use in mortar and concrete. Construction and Building Materials 24:113–117Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saboya F, Xavier GC, Alexandre J (2007) The use of the powder marble by-product to enhance the properties of brick ceramic. Construction and Building Materials 21:1950–1960Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bilgin N, Yeprem HA, Arslan S et al (2012) Use of waste marble powder in brick industry. Construction and Building Materials 29:449–457Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunster AM (2007) Crushed waste stone and production waste in concrete landscaping products. Characterisation of Mineral Wastes, Resources and Processing technologies — Integrated waste management for the production of construction materialGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senturk A, Gunduz L, Tosun Y et al (1996) Marble technology. Tugra Pres, Isparta Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubois D, Prade H (1978) Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of System Sciences 9:613–626Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaufmann A (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hejazi SR, Memariani A, Jahanshahloo G et al (2002) Linear bilevel programming solution by genetic algorithm. Computers and Operations Research 29:1913–1925Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gendreau M, Marcotte P, Savard G (1996) A hybrid tabu-ascent algorithm for the linear bilevel programming problem. Journal of Global Optimization 29:217–233Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muhammad A (2011) Temporary workforce planning with firm contracts: A model and a simulated annealing heuristic. Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2011/209693/
  15. 15.
    Ryu JH, Dua V, Pistikopoulos EN (2004) Bi-level programming framework for enterprisewide process networks under uncertainty. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28:1121–1129Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takama N, Umeda T (1980) Multi-level, multi-objective optimization in processing engineering. Chemical Engineering Science 36:129–136Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    TeresaW, Som S, Mengqi H (2011) The application of memetic algorithms for forearm crutch design: A case study. Mathematical Problems in Engineering http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2011/162580/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abid Hussain Nadeem
    • 1
  • Muhammad Hashim
    • 1
  • Muhammad Nazim
    • 1
  1. 1.Uncertainty Decision-Making LaboratorySichuan UniversityChengduP. R. China

Personalised recommendations