Systematic Sustainable Design in Architecture and the Need to Mimic Nature

Conference paper

Abstract

Need for finding long-term sustainable design and development solutions; which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs that warrant continuing human existence and well-being is far more compelling in these days. Sustainable architecture reiterates the fact that humans receive what they need from the universe. Sustainable design is a positive response to awareness that nature provides, not a prescriptive formula for survival. A conceptual framework and strategies for sustainable coexistence, based on the three fundamental concepts; objectives, means, and end, is attempted. Limitations of the traditional design models are brought-out and the need to search for mimicking nature is established. Biomimicing thought process, is illustrated and application of Biomimicing in architectural design is illustrated along with a list of recommendations.

Keywords

Global Ecosystem Sustainable Design Human Comfort Palm Leaf Inherent Inability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Development WC (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papanek V (1995) The green imperative ecology and ethics in design and architecture. Thames and Hudson, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Celeb G (2003) Environmental discourse and conceptual framework for sustainable architecture. GÜ-J Sci 16(1):205–216Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrew S (1992) Sourcebook of sustainable design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergen SB (1997) Ecological engineering: design based on ecological principles. ASAE Annual International Meeting, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim J-JR (2000) Sustainable architecture module: introduction to sustainable designGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Institute of Architects (1996) Environmental resource guide. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kua HL (2002) Demonstration intelligent building—a methodology for the promotion of total sustainability in the built environment. Build Environ 37(3):231–240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curran MA (1996) Environmental life cycle assessment. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burall P (1996) Product development and environment. The Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Celebi GA (2001) Architectural responsibilities within the context of sustainability. In: Proceedings of Trabzon: livable environments & architecture international congress. 4–7 July 2001Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bar-Cohen Y (2006) BIOMIMETICS-biologically inspired technologies. 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Regional PlanningIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Research and Dam Safety OrganizationKerala State Electricity BoardPallom, KottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations