CIRP Design 2012 pp 37-46 | Cite as
Systematic Sustainable Design in Architecture and the Need to Mimic Nature
Abstract
Need for finding long-term sustainable design and development solutions; which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs that warrant continuing human existence and well-being is far more compelling in these days. Sustainable architecture reiterates the fact that humans receive what they need from the universe. Sustainable design is a positive response to awareness that nature provides, not a prescriptive formula for survival. A conceptual framework and strategies for sustainable coexistence, based on the three fundamental concepts; objectives, means, and end, is attempted. Limitations of the traditional design models are brought-out and the need to search for mimicking nature is established. Biomimicing thought process, is illustrated and application of Biomimicing in architectural design is illustrated along with a list of recommendations.
Keywords
Global Ecosystem Sustainable Design Human Comfort Palm Leaf Inherent InabilityReferences
- 1.Development WC (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Papanek V (1995) The green imperative ecology and ethics in design and architecture. Thames and Hudson, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 3.Celeb G (2003) Environmental discourse and conceptual framework for sustainable architecture. GÜ-J Sci 16(1):205–216Google Scholar
- 4.Andrew S (1992) Sourcebook of sustainable design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bergen SB (1997) Ecological engineering: design based on ecological principles. ASAE Annual International Meeting, USAGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kim J-JR (2000) Sustainable architecture module: introduction to sustainable designGoogle Scholar
- 7.American Institute of Architects (1996) Environmental resource guide. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kua HL (2002) Demonstration intelligent building—a methodology for the promotion of total sustainability in the built environment. Build Environ 37(3):231–240Google Scholar
- 9.Curran MA (1996) Environmental life cycle assessment. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Burall P (1996) Product development and environment. The Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 11.Celebi GA (2001) Architectural responsibilities within the context of sustainability. In: Proceedings of Trabzon: livable environments & architecture international congress. 4–7 July 2001Google Scholar
- 12.Bar-Cohen Y (2006) BIOMIMETICS-biologically inspired technologies. 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar