Ontology Enriched Framework for Cloud-based Enterprise Interoperability

  • Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves
  • Adina Cretan
  • Carlos Coutinho
  • Moisés Dutra
  • Parisa Ghodous
Conference paper


The globalised world has entered the service era, where an enterprise is connected to the entire world, producing and consuming services using the internet. Virtualisation and service provisioning are paradigms that rule the interoperation of the world today. However, this interoperability mostly relies on a set of agreed message syntax exchanges, agreements that are fragile and limited in their scope, and it lacks a proper framework that can manage the sustainability of a networked Enterprise Interoperability (EI) environment. After presenting the problem and the research questions concerned with cloud-based EI, the paper presents the actual practices and research challenges on EI identified needs, addressing ontology, negotiation and cloud-based aspects for sustainability in EI. Then it proposes an ontology-enriched framework for cloud-based EI, and discusses on its validation in an industrial scenario.


Enterprise interoperability Ontology Negotiation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Jardim-Goncalves R, Sarraipa J, Agostinho C, Panetto H. Knowledge Framework for Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2009 Oct 22; 22(5):725–35.Google Scholar
  2. Cretan A, Coutinho C, Bratu B, Jardim-Goncalves R. A Framework for Sustainable Interoperability of Negotiation Processes. In: Paper submitted to 14th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (INCOM’12). 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Jardim-Goncalves R, Grilo A, Steiger-Garcao A. Challenging the interoperability between computers in industry with MDA and SOA. Computers in Industry. 2006 Dec;57(8-9):679–89.Google Scholar
  4. Papazoglou MP, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F. Service-Oriented Computing: a Research Roadmap. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems. 2008; 17(02):223.Google Scholar
  5. Athena Consortium. Athena Interoperability Framework [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2011 Dec 20]; Available from:
  6. Chen D, Doumeingts G, Vernadat F. Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry. 2008 Sep; 59(7):647–59.Google Scholar
  7. Sarraipa J, Jardim-Goncalves R, Steiger-Garcao A. MENTOR: an enabler for interoperable intelligent systems. International Journal of General Systems. 2010 Jul; 39(5):557–73.Google Scholar
  8. Dutra M, Ghodous P, Kuhn O. A Generic and Synchronous Ontology-based Architecture for Collaborative Design. Concurrent Engineering. 2010 Feb 4; 18(1):65–74.Google Scholar
  9. Coutinho C, Cretan A, Jardim-Goncalves R. Sustainable Interoperability Framework for supporting Negotiation Processes. In: 6th International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Systems and Applications (I-ESA 2012). 2011.Google Scholar
  10. Nie L, Xu X, Chen D, Zacharewicz G, Zhan D. GRAI-ICE Model Driven Interoperability Architecture for Developing Interoperable ESA. In: Enterprise Interoperability IV. Springer; 2010. p. 111–21.Google Scholar
  11. Agostinho C, Correia F, Jardim-Goncalves R. Interoperability of Complex Business Networks by Language Independent Information Models. In: New World Situation: New Directions in Concurrent Engineering - Proceedings of the 17th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering (CE 2010). 2011. p. Part 2, 111–124.Google Scholar
  12. Pataki B, Kovács L, Guglielmina C, Arezza A. ABILITIES to Support a Federated Architecture Based Interoperability Bus with Groupware and Multimedia. In: Enterprise Interoperability II. 2007. p. 415–26.Google Scholar
  13. Torres JM, Wijnands Q. Distributed Agents for Multi-Rover Autonomy. 20th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises. 2011 Jun;:53–8.Google Scholar
  14. Miller T, McBurney P. Propositional Dynamic Logic for Reasoning about First-Class Agent Interaction Protocols. Computational Intelligence. 2011; 27(3):422–57.Google Scholar
  15. Oliva E, McBurney P, Omicini A, Viroli M. Argumentation and Artifacts for Negotiation Support. International Journal of Artifical Intelligence. 2010; 4(S10):90–117.Google Scholar
  16. Relvas A, Richardson R, Coutinho C, Ribeiro A, Dunne C. Domain Design Application (DDA) and enhancements of communication layer for CDF. In: 3rd International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications (SECESA 2008). 2008. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  17. Jardim-Goncalves R, Agostinho C, Malo P, Steiger-garcao A. Harmonising technologies in conceptual models representation. International Journal Of Product Lifecycle Management. 2007; 2(2):187–205.Google Scholar
  18. Jardim-Goncalves R, Figay N, Steiger-Garcao A. Enabling interoperability of STEP Application Protocols at metadata and knowledge level. International Journal of Technology Management. 2006; 36(4):402–421(20).Google Scholar
  19. Luo X, Miao C, Jennings NR, He M, Shen Z, Zhang M. KEMNAD : A Knowledge Engineering Methodology for Negotiating Agent Development. Computational Intelligence. 2012; 28(1):51–105.Google Scholar
  20. Georgantas N, Ahaman MA, Ameziani H, Pathak A, Issarny V. A Coordination Middleware for Orchestrating Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 6646: Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing. 2011. p. 221–32.Google Scholar
  21. Sycara K, Dai T. Agent Reasoning in Negotiation. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C, editors. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation Volume 4: Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer; 2010. p. 437–51.Google Scholar
  22. Duan L, Doğru MK, Özen U, Beck JC. A negotiation framework for linked combinatorial optimization problems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 2011 Apr 29; 25(1):158–82.Google Scholar
  23. Hu J, Deng L. An Association Rule-Based Bilateral Multi-Issue Negotiation Model. Fourth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design. 2011 Oct; (1):234–7.Google Scholar
  24. Grilo A, Jardim-Goncalves R. Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments. Automation in Construction. 2010 Aug; 19(5):522–30.Google Scholar
  25. Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S, Broberg J, Brandic I. Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2009 Jun; 25(6):599–616.Google Scholar
  26. Jeffery K, Neidecker-Lutz B. The Future of Cloud Computing: Opportunities for European Cloud Computing Beyond 2010 [Internet]. Analysis. 2010; :71. Available from:
  27. Sharma R, Sood M. Cloud SaaS and Model Driven Architecture. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies (ACCT11). 2011. p. 978–81.Google Scholar
  28. Jardim-Goncalves R, Grilo A. SOA4BIM: Putting the building and construction industry in the Single European Information Space. Automation in Construction. 2010 Jul; 19(4):388–97.Google Scholar
  29. Grilo A, Jardim-Goncalves R. Challenging electronic procurement in the AEC sector: A BIM-based integrated perspective. Automation in Construction. 2011 Mar; 20(2):107–14.Google Scholar
  30. Kolfschoten G, Matthyssen A, Fijneman M. Theoretical foundations for Concurrent Design. In: 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications (SECESA 2010). 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Ton A, Coutinho C, Richardson R, Relvas A, Haenisch J, Christiansen T. The ESA OCDS Project - Enhancing the Concurrent Design Concept. In: 10th NASA-ESA Workshop on Product Data Exchange (PDE2008). 2008.Google Scholar
  32. ESA-CDF. ESA-CDF [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2012 Jan 10]; Available from:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves
    • 1
  • Adina Cretan
    • 2
  • Carlos Coutinho
    • 1
  • Moisés Dutra
    • 3
  • Parisa Ghodous
    • 4
  1. 1.DEE/FCTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa, UNINOVALisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Computer Science Department“Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Information Science DepartmentFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  4. 4.University of Lyon 1LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations