Advertisement

Motion Detection in General Backgrounds

  • Ester Martínez-Martín
  • Ángel P. del Pobil
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

Once the basic case of the motion detection problem has been studied and solved the issues referred to the use of different imaging sensors, the adaptation to different environments, different motion speed, the shape changes of the targets, and some uncontrolled dynamic factors (e.g. gradual/sudden illumination changes), we have focused on motion detection when real scenes are considered. Therefore, in this chapter, the goal is to design a perfect segmentation technique based on motion in environments without any constraint about the environment and the targets to be identified. With that aim, different issues such as, for instance, the presence of vacillating background elements or the distinction between targets and background objects in terms of motion and motionless situations, have been studied and solved. Thus, a brief review of the previous work is carried out in order to introduce our approach. Then, a deeper analysis of the problems as well as the proposed solutions are explained. Finally, experimental results, from qualitative and quantitative points of view, are presented and discussed. As it will be demonstrated, compared with classical techniques, the proposed algorithm is faster, more robust, and sensor-independent.

Keywords

Machine vision Computer vision Image segmentation Background maintenance Motion detection Robot vision Dynamic environments Visual surveillance 

References

  1. 1.
    Heikkila, J., Silve, O.: A real-time system for monitoring of cyclists and pedestrians.: Second IEEE Workshop on Visual Surveillance, pp. 74–81. Fort Collins, Colorado (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cavallaro, A., Ebrahimi, T.: Video object extraction based on adaptive background and statistical change detection. In: B. Girod, C.A. Bouman, E.G. Steinbach (eds.) Visual Communications and Image Processing 2001, pp. 465–475. SPIE (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, B., Hedley, M.: Background estimation for video surveillance. In: Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ), pp. 315–320. Auckland, New Zealand (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gloyer, B., Aghajan, H., Siu, K.Y., Kailath, T.: Video-based freeway-monitoring system using recursive vehicle tracking. In: SPIE Annual Meeting, pp. 173–180. San Jose, CA, USA (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Massey, M., Bender, W.: Salient stills: process and practice. IBM Systems Journal 35(3–4), 557–573 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lo, B., Velastin, S.: Automatic congestion detection system for underground platforms. In: International Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, pp. 158–161. Kowloon Shangri-La, Hong Kong, China (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, Q., Aggarwal, J.: Tracking and classifying moving objects from video. In: Second IEEE Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS). Kauai, Hawai (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cucchiara, R., Grana, C., Piccardi, M., Prati, A.: Detecting moving objects, ghosts, and shadows in video streams. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 25(10), 1337–1342 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elgammal, A., Harwood, D., Davis, L.: Background and foreground modeling using non-parametric kernel density estimation for visual surveillance. In: IEEE Proceedings, pp. 1151–1163 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, R., Lipton, A., Kanade, T., Fijiyoshi, H., Duggins, D., Tsin, Y., Tolliver, D., Enomoto, N., Hasegawa, O., Burt, P., Wixson, L.: A system for video surveillance and monitoring. Tech. rep., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanade, T., Collins, R., Lipton, A., Burt, P., Wixson, L.: Advances in cooperative multi-sensor video surveillance. In: Darpa Image Understanding Workshop, vol. I, pp. 3–24. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wren, C., Azarbeyejani, A., Darrell, T., Pentland, A.: Pfinder: Real-time tracking of the human body. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 19(7), 780–785 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azarbayejani, A., Wren, C., Pentland, A.: Real-time 3-d tracking of the human body. In: IMAGE’COM, 374. Bordeaux, France (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stauffer, C., Grimson, W.: Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 27(5), 747–757 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao, X., Boult, T., Coetzee, F., Ramesh, V.: Error analysis of background subtraction. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1503–1510. Hilton Head, SC, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benezeth, Y., Jodoin, P., Emile, B., Laurent, H., Rosenberger, C.: Review and evaluation of commonly-implemented background subtraction algorithms. In: 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 1–4. Tampa, Florida (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toyama, K., Krumm, J., Brumitt, B., Meyers, B.: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/jckrumm/WallFlower/TestImages.htm (1999)
  18. 18.
    Hörster, E., Lienhart, R.: http://mmc36.informatik.uni-augsburg.de/VSSN06_OSAC/ (2006)
  19. 19.
    Taj, M.: Surveillance performance evaluation initiative (spevi)—audiovisual people dataset. http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/staffinfo/andrea/avss2007_d.html (2007)
  20. 20.
    Stauffer, C., Grimson, W.: Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 246–252 (1999).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matsuyama, T., Ohya, T., Habe, H.: Background subtraction for non-stationary scenes. In: Fourth Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 662–667. Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haritaoglu, I., Harwood, D., Davis, L.: W4: Real-time surveillance of people and their activities. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 22(8), 809–830 (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakai, H.: Non-parameterized bayes decision method for moving object detection. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Singapore (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oliver, N., Rosario, B., Pentland, A.: A bayesian computer vision system for modeling human interactions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 22(8), 831–843 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Toyama, K., Krum, J., Brumitt, B., Meyers, B.: Wallflower: Principles and practice of background maintenance. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), vol. 1, pp. 255–261. Kerkyra, Greece (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kottow, D., Koppen, M., del Solar, J.R.: A background maintenance model in the spatial-range domain. In: 2nd ECCV Workshop on Statistical Methods in Video Processing, pp. 141–152. Prague, Czech Republic (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Varcheie, P., Sills-Lavoie, M., Bilodeau, G.A.: An efficient region-based background subtraction technique. In: Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, pp. 71–78 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Migliore, D., Matteucci, M., Naccari, M.: A revaluation of frame difference in fast and robust motion detection. In: 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (VSSN), pp. 215–218. Santa Barbara, California (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.

Copyright information

© Ester Martínez-Martín 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ester Martínez-Martín
    • 1
  • Ángel P. del Pobil
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringJaume I UniversityCastellón de la PlanaSpain

Personalised recommendations