Designing for Collocated Couples
Though the design of technologies for couples has been thriving for well over a decade now, the products made for and the needs of couples examined in HCI research are surprisingly narrow. Overwhelmingly they are for partners at a distance and lightweight interactions that can best be described as abstracted presence. Towards moving couples technologies into broader waters and guiding exploration of the many other facets of couplehood, we propose an expanded couples design space that includes technologies for local partners and deep interpersonal sharing—hitherto underexplored design concerns. We then show that the creation of these new spaces can be motivated by the needs of couples as characterized by couples experts and present an example of a new technology that embodies these. Finally, we draw from experience with couples in the field to identify research and design considerations regarding gender, power, values, and ethics.
KeywordsDesign Space Local Partner Design Motivation Picture Frame Technological Mediation
Many thanks are in order. Thanks to Intel for funding this work. Thanks also to Tad Hirsch, who was instrumental in the inception of the project, and the many others who have guided it along the way: Joon S. Lee, Clarissa ‘K’ Stiles, Jason Chong Lee, Deborah Tatar, Dawn Nafus, Christopher M. Hoadley, Fred P. Piercy, Denis Kafura, and Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones. Finally, we are grateful to the participants who have shared their time, expertise, and personal stories.
- Anon. AAMFT code of ethics. aamft.org. http://www.aamft.org/imis15/content/legal_ethics/code_of_ethics.aspx. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Anon. Design based research collective. designbasedresearch.org. http://www.designbasedresearch.org/index.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Anon. Duofone. gajitz.com. http://gajitz.com/share-the-love-matching-connectable-phones-for-couples/. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Anon. Hug shirt. cutecircuit.com. http://www.cutecircuit.com/products/thehugshirt/. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Anon. netflix.com. http://www.netflix.com.
- Anon. (2004). Telesquishy. popgadget.net. http://www.popgadget.net/2004/12/wanna_play_tele.php. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Anon. (2005a). Kiss communicator. we-make-money-not-art.com. http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2005/10/kiss-communicat.php. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Anon. (2005b). Tok Tok & Tug Tug. we-make-money-not-art.com. http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2005/01/tok-tok-and-tug.php. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Anon. (2008). Love tech goes long distance. forbes.com. http://www.forbes.com/2008/02/06/love-gadgets-valentine-tech-lovebiz08-cx_ag_0206distance.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.
- Anon. (2009). Daily temperature reading. fatherhoodchannel.com. http://fatherhoodchannel.com/q2009/12/19/daily-temperature-reading/. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Anon. (2010). Fix a fight. itunes.apple.com. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fix-a-fight/id376117430?mt= 8. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Anon. (2011). Aura. fashioningtech.com. http://www.fashioningtech.com/profiles/blogs/aura-wearable-devices-for. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.
- Bales, E., Li, K. A., Griwsold, W. (2011). CoupleVIBE: mobile implicit communication to improve awareness for (long-distance) couples. Proceedings of the CSCW’11 (pp. 65–74). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Brave, S., Dahley, A. (1997). inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’97 Extended Abstracts (pp. 363–364). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X. C., Ishii, H. (2001). LumiTouch: an emotional communication device. Proceedings of the CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts (pp. 313–314). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Chen, C.-Y., Forlizzi, J., Jennings, P. (2006). ComSlipper: an expressive design to support awareness and availability. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts (pp. 369–374). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Chung, H., Lee, C.-H. J., Selker, T. (2006). Lover’s cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts (pp. 313–314). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Clawson, J., Patel, N., Starner, T. (2010). Digital kick in the shin: on-body communication tools for couples trapped in face-to-face group conversations. Workshop on Ensembles of On-Body Devices, MobileHCI ’10.Google Scholar
- Danielson, D. K. (2007). Is your blackberry ruining your sex life? forbes.com. http://www.forbes.com/2007/01/11/leadership-blackberry-treo-cx_pink_0111blackberry.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2011.
- Davis, H., Skov, M. B., Stougaard, M., Vetere, F. (2007). Virtual box: supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. Proceedings of the OZCHI ’07 (pp. 151–159). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Design-based Research Collective . (2003). Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 5–8.Google Scholar
- Dodge, C. (1997). The bed: a medium for intimate communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts (pp. 371–372). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Goodman, E., Misilim, M. (2003). The sensing beds. Workshop on Intimate Computing, UbiComp ’03.Google Scholar
- Hayashi, T., Agamanolis, S., Karau, M. (2008). Mutsugoto: a body-drawing communicator for distant partners. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH ’08 posters (pp. 91:1–91:1). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Ito, M. (2005). Intimate visual co-presence. Workshop on Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing, UbiComp ’05.Google Scholar
- Kaye, J.' J.' (2006). I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 (pp. 363–368). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Kaye, J.' J.', Goulding, L. (2004). Intimate objects. Proceedings of the DIS ’04 (pp. 341–344). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- King, J., Forlizzi, J. (2007). Slow messaging: intimate communication for couples living at a distance. Proceedings of the Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces ’07 (pp. 451–454). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Li, I., Forlizzi, J., Dey, A. (2010). Know thyself: monitoring and reflecting on facets of one’s life. Proceedings of the CHI ’10 (pp. 4489–4492). New York, ACM.Google Scholar
- Lindley, S. E., Harper, R., Sellen, A. (2009). Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. Proceedings of the CHI ’09 (pp. 1693–1702). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Lottridge, D., Masson, N., Mackay, W. (2009). Sharing empty moments: design for remote couples. Proceedings of the CHI ’09 (pp. 2329–2338). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Mallon, T. (1987). A book of one’s own: people and their diaries. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Mueller, F.' F.', Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., Howard, S. (2005). Hug over a distance. Proceedings of the CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts (pp. 1673–1676). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Ogawa, H., Ando, N., Ondera, S. (2005). SmallConnection: designing of tangible communication media over networks. Proceedings. of the MM ’05 (pp. 1073–1074). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Patel, D., Agamanolis, S. (2003). Habitat: awareness of life rhythms over a distance using networked furniture. Adjunct Proceedings of the UbiComp ’03.Google Scholar
- Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J.’ J.’ (2005). Reflective design. Proceedings of the Critical Computing ’05 (pp. 49–58). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Strong, R., Gaver, B. (1996). Feather, scent and Shaker: supporting simple intimacy. Proceedings of the CSCW ’96 (pp. 29–30). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: women and men in conversation. New York: Harper Paperbacks.Google Scholar
- Tsujita, H., Siio, I., Tsukada, K. (2007). SyncDecor: appliances for sharing mutual awareness between lovers separated by distance. Proceedings of the CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts (pp. 2699–2704). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F.’ F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. Proceedings of the CHI ’05 (pp. 471–480). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Wilson, M. (2009). Hey, who ordered ‘Gigli’? The New York times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/fashion/29netflix.html. Accessed 07 Dec 2011.
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.Google Scholar