Metamorphic Structure Representation: Designing and Evaluating Anatomies of Metamorphic Manipulators

  • Charalampos Valsamos
  • Vassilis C. Moulianitis
  • Nikos Aspragathos
Conference paper

Abstract

In this work the metamorphic structure representation (MSR) is proposed for the systematic development and evaluation of structures of metamorphic serial manipulators. The basic elements of MSR are presented, in terms of module and connection type. The conceptual design of metamorphic structures using MSR is presented. The criteria for evaluating emerging structures are introduced in terms of simplicity and solvability of inverse kinematics. Finally, a case study of two different structures is presented along with their subsequent evaluation.

Keywords

Open chain metamorphic manipulators Reconfigurable robots Structure representation 

References

  1. 1.
    Paredis C, Brown B, Khosla P (1996) A rapidly deployable manipulator system, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1434–1439Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen I-M (2001) Rapid response manufacturing through a rapidly reconfigurable robotic workcell. ROBOT CIM-INT MANUF 17:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen I-M, Yang G, Yeo S-H (2006) Automatic modeling for modular reconfigurable robotic systems, theory and practice, industrial-robotics-theory-modelling-control. ARS/plV, Germany, ISBN 3-86611-285-8, p 964Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charalampos D Valsamos CD, Moulianitis V, Aspragathos N (2011) Index based optimal anatomy of a metamorphic manipulator for a given task, Accepted for publication to ROBOT CIM-INT MANUFGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valsamos H, Moulianitis V, Aspragathos N, Rapid evaluation of reconfigurable robots anatomies using computational intelligence, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC 6277 LNAI (PART 2), pp 341–350Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Valsamos H, Aspragathos NA (2009) Determination of anatomy and configuration of a reconfigurable manipulator for the optimal manipulability, IEEE/ASME ReMAR’09 Conference, pp 497–504Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang T Dai JS Fang YF, Zeng Q (2011) String matrix based geometrical and topological representation of mechanisms, the 13th world congress in mechanism and machine science, Guanajuato, 19–25 June2011 No.A23_493Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen I-M, Gao Y (1998) Inverse kinematics for modular robots. In: Proceeding Of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aghili F, Parsa K, (2007) Configuration control and recalibration of a new reconfigurable robot. 2007 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma 10–14 April 2007, pp 4047–4083Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao Y (2000) Decomposible closed-form inverse kinematics for reconfigurable robots using product of exponential formula. Master Thesis, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering Nanyang Technological University, SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charalampos Valsamos
    • 1
  • Vassilis C. Moulianitis
    • 2
  • Nikos Aspragathos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aeronautics EngineeringUniversity of PatrasRioGreece
  2. 2.Department of Product and Systems DesignUniversity of the AegeanErmoupolisGreece

Personalised recommendations