Simulations for Crisis Management – PANDORA’s Box
Natural and human created disasters are increasingly becoming a common feature of our lives. From the recent tsunami and its aftermath in Japan to Icelandic volcanic ashes, to terrorists instigated actions such as 9/11 and the 7th July bombings in London there is a clear need for better training of strategic decision makers as well as the operational forces who need to deal with very complex and almost always multi agency operations. Quite often the difference between an emergency and a disaster is one or two critically wrong decisions in what quite often is a very tight and limited time span. PANDORA is a 3.9 Million Euro European FP7 funded project that aims to make use of emerging serious gaming concepts and technologies to develop an innovative and more effective training environment for the strategic decision makers (the Gold Commanders) so that they can cope more effectively with such difficult and challenging situations.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Atkin, A. (2004), “Playing at Reality: Exploring the Potential of the Digital Game as a Medium for Science Communication”, Published by the Australian National University, PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
- 2.Chan, W-H(2007), “Serious Games=Serious Training”; Published in FCW.com as a cover story May 7, 2007.Google Scholar
- 3.Harrison, P. (2007), “Games 3.0: Developing and Creating for the 3rd Age of Video Games” Keynote of Phil Harrison, President of Worldwide Studios, Sony Computer Entertainment to Games Developers Conference 2007Google Scholar
- 4.Ochalla, B. (2007), “Who Says Video Games Have to be Fun? The Rise of Serious Games”, Published by Gamasutra, June 29th 2007, www.gamasutra.com.
- 5.Marecki, J., Schurr, N., Tambe, M., Scerri, P., (2009), Analyzing Dangers in Multiagent Rescue Using DEFACTO, Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems, M. Barley, H.Google Scholar
- 6.Mouratidis, A. Unruh, D. Spears, P. Scerri, F. Massacci (Eds), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4324, pp 241–257Google Scholar
- 7.Smith, H. (2001), “The Future of Game Design: Moving Beyond Deus Ex and Other Dated Paradigms”, delivered lecture in Multimedia International Market, in Montreal, October 2001Google Scholar
- 8.Smith, J.L., Brokaw, J.T., (2008), Agent Based Simulation of Human Movements during Emergency Evacuations of Facilities, Proceedings of the 2008 Structures Congress.Google Scholar
- 9.Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., (1995), Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey, Intelligent Agents, Wooldridge, Jennings (eds.), Springer-Verlag, pp 1–22.Google Scholar
- 10.Zyda, M. (2006), “Educating the Next Generation of Game Developers”, Journal of Computer, Published by IEEE Computer Society, p:30–34.Google Scholar
- 11.Jourdan, M.; Layaida, N.; and Roisin, C. 1998. A Survey on Authoring Techniques for Temporal Scenarios of Multi- media Documents. In Furht, B., ed., Handbook of Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications - part 1: Tools and Standards. CRC Press. 469–490.Google Scholar
- 12.Young, R. M. (1999). Notes on the Use of Plan Structures in the Creation of Interactive Plot. Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on ``Narrative Intelligence'', Cape Cod, MA.Google Scholar
- 13.Muscettola, N. 1994. HSTS: Integrating Planning and Scheduling. In Zweben, M. and Fox, M.S., ed., Intelligent Scheduling. Morgan Kauffmann.Google Scholar
- 14.Jonsson, A.; Morris, P.; Muscettola, N.; Rajan, K.; and Smith, B. 2000. Planning in Interplanetary Space: The- ory and Practice. In AIPS-00. Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling.Google Scholar
- 16.Cortellessa, G.; D’Amico, R.; Pagani, M.; Tiberio, L.; De Benedictis, R.; Bernardi, G.; and Cesta, A. 2011. Mod- eling Users of Crisis Training Environments by Integrating Psychological and Physiological Data. In IEA/AIE 2011, Part II,, volume LNAI 6704, 79–88.Google Scholar