Advertisement

SAFECOMP ’93 pp 230-239 | Cite as

Software Failure Data Analysis of two Successive Generations of a Switching System

  • Mohamed Kaâniche
  • Karama Kanoun
Conference paper

Abstract

Experimental studies dealing with the analysis of data collected on families of products are seldom reported. In this paper, we analyse the failure data of two successive products of a software switching system during validation and operation. A comparative analysis is done with respect to: i) the modifications performed on system components, ii) the distribution of failures and corrected faults in the components and the functions fulfilled by the system, and iii) the evolution of the failure intensity functions.

Keywords

Fault Density Successive Product Software Reliability Switching System Failure Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Laprie J. C., “For a Product-in-a Process Approach to Software Reliability Evaluation”, in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering, pp.134–139, Raleigh, NC, USA, October 1992.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Wallace J. J. and Barnes W. W., “Designing for Ultrahigh Availability: The Unix RTR Operating System”, Computer, pp.31–39, August 1984.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Sullivan M. and Chillarege R., “A Comparison of Software Defects in Database Management Systems and Operating Systems”, in Proc. 22nd IEEE Int. Symp. on Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS-22), pp.475–484, Boston, MA, USA, July 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Kanoun K., Bastos Martini M. and Moreira de Souza J., “A Method for Software Reliability Analysis and Prediction—Application to The TROPICO-R Switching System”, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, SE-17 (4) April 1991.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kanoun K., Kaâniche M. and Laprie J.-C., “Experience in Software Reliability: From Data Collection to Quantitative Evaluation”, in Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE’93), Denver, CO, USA, November 1993.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Vianna B., “R&D at TELEBRAS-CPqD: The TROPICO System”, in Proc. Int. Conf. Communications (ICC 88), pp.622–626, Philadelphia, PA, USA, June 1988.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Vianna B., Cunha E. C. and Boin F. F., “Hardware Quality Control in the TROPICO System”, in Proc. Int. Conf. Communications (ICC 88), pp.632–636, Philadelphia, PA, USA, June 1988.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Basili V. R. and Perricone B. T., “Software Errors and Complexity: An Empirical Investigation”, Communications of the ACM, 27 (1), pp.42-52, January 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Grady R. B. and Caswell D. L., Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program, 288p., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kenney G. Q. and Vouk M. A., “Measuring the Field Quality of Wide-Distribution Commercial Software”, in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE’92), pp.351-357, Raleigh, NC, USA, October 1992.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Musa J., Iannino A. and Okumoto K., Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application, Computer Science Series, McGraw-Hill, New-York, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Laprie J. C, Kanoun K., Béounes C. and Kaâniche M., “The KAT (Knowledge-Action-Transformation) Approach to the Modeling and Evaluation of Reliability and Availability Growth”, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, SE-17 (4), pp.370-382, April 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Kaâniche
    • 1
  • Karama Kanoun
    • 1
  1. 1.LAAS-CNRSToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations