Analysis of Improvement due to Interleaving for Data Transmission over Mobile Satellite Channel with Trellis Coded Modulation System

  • M. G. Françon
  • M. Bousquet
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents simulation results of the improvement due to interleaver with Trellis-coded modulation scheme in a channel model of a Mobile Satellite Communications System. The transmission technique makes use of a Trellis code for 8-PSK modulation and a block interleaver with fixed interleaving span of 10 symbols and different interleaving depths assuming a delay transmission constraint of 100 ms. Performances are analyzed in terms of Bit Error Rate (BER) versus Energy to Noise Power Spectral Density ratio. An available simulation model of fading channel has been designed with a combination of Rice / Lognormal statistics. This model is suitable for all types of environments by tuning the model parameters and take into account the elevation angle and the mobile velocity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Ungerboeck, « Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase Signals », IEEE Trans. On Commun., Vol. COM-28,n°1, Jan. 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Fines and A.H. Aghvami, «A Comparison Study of Low Bit Rate DE-QPSK and TCM-8PSK Fully Digital Demodulators over a Land Mobile Satellite Link », GLOBECOM’90, San Diego, California, pp. 401.6.1–401. 6. 6, Dec. 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G.E. Corazza and F. Vataloro, « A Statistical Model for Land Mobile Satellite Channels and its Application to Nongeostationnary Orbit Systems », IEEE Trans. On Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-43, n°3, Aug. 1994.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Divsalar, M.K. Simon, « The Design of Trellis Coded MPSK for Fading Channels: Performance Criteria », IEEE Trans. On Commun., Vol. COM-36, n°9, Sept. 1988.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Loo, « A Statistical Model for Land Mobile Satellite Link », IEEE Trans. On Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-40, Aug. 1985.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Lutz, D. Cygan, M. Dippold, F.0 Dolainsky and W. Papke, « The Land Mobile Satellite Communication Channel-Recording, Statistics and Channel Model », IEEE Trans. On Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-40, May 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Sforza and S. Buonomo, « Characterisation of the Propagation Channel for Nongeostationnary LMS Systems at L- and S-bands: Narrow Band Experimental Data and Channel Modeling », in Proc. XVII NAPEX Conf. Pasadena, CA, June 14–15, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Jahn, S. Buonomo, M. Sforza and E. Lutz, « Narrow and Wideband Channel Characterization for Land Mobile Satellite Systems: Experimental Results at L-Band », IMSC’95, Ottawa, June 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Fines and A.H. Aghvami, « Synchronization Techniques for all Digital 16-ary QAM Receivers operating over Land Mobile Satellite Links », IMSC’90, Ottawa, June 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Loo and N. Secord, « Computer Models for Fading Channels with Applications to Digital Transmission », IEEE Trans. On Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-40, Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.G. Proakis, « Digiyal Communications », Mc Graw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Françon
    • 1
  • M. Bousquet
    • 1
  1. 1.SUPAEROToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations