Skip to main content

Robust Processing of Visual Evoked Potentials

  • Conference paper
Neural Nets WIRN VIETRI-98

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

Electrophysiology measurements attempt to get information about neural pathological conditions by measuring electrical cortical responses to appopriate stimuli.

Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) are the responses of occipital visual cortex to time-varying images captured by human eyes. They consist of a quasi-deterministic signal embedded in a strong background noise, produced by Electro-EncephaloGraphic (EEG) activity, sensors and amplifiers.

The VEP analysis is useful for early diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes, neural diseases such as multiple sclerosis, vascular diseases of the brain, check of the visual acuity in non-collaborative patients (children, old-aged people with degenerative neural diseases), and as a support for medico-legal investigations.

The signal-to-noise ratio is usually very low and a statistical averaging on multiple stimuli is required in order to recover an acceptable VEP waveform.

However the background noise is highly non stationary, clearly not Gaussian distributed and in some realization there is a strong quasi-periodic interference due to cerebral α-waves.

Moreover, the loss of attention and blinking may cause the lack or the weakening of the VEP signal in some trials. This impacts the reliability of standard (unweighted) average commonly used to reduce noise effects. So estimators that are resistant to the presence of outliers in the data set should be used for VEP preprocessing.

In this work, traditional robust estimators, such as the trimmed mean, and the median are compared with a modern neural version of the Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) which uses the recently developed Block Recursive Least Squares (BRLS) learning algorithm.

The same IRLS is used for the final deconvolution of brain spikes, that are the main target of VEP analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Visual Electrodiagnostic — A guide to procedures, ISCEV (International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Heckenlively, G.B. Arden, Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, Mosby Year Book, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.L. Nunez, R.D. Katznelson, Electric Fields in Brain — The Neurophysics of EEG, Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Remonds, “A Didactic Review of Methods and Applications of EEG Data Processing,” International Course of EEG Data Processing — Paris 1977, EEG Informatics by Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V.D. Constantinescu, “Revealing the Distinction Between Perception and Cognition Through Intra-individual Variability of Visual Evoked Responses,” International Journal of Bio Medical Computing Vol. 40, pp. 169–178, Elsevier Science, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Panzeri, G. Biella, E.T. Rolls, W.E. Skoggs, A. Treves, “Speed, Noise, Information and the Graded Nature of Neural Responses.” Computation in Neural System, No. 7, pp. 365–370, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Gurzi, G. Biella, A. Spalvieri, “Estimate of Mutual Information Carried by Neuronal Responses From Small Data Samples,” Computation in Neural System, No. 7, pp. 717–725, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Uncini, M. Marchesi, G. Orlandi, F. Piazza, “An Adaptive Neural Network Filter for Evoked Potentials,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Parisi, E.D. Di Claudio, G. Orlandi and B.D. Rao, “A generalized learning paradigm exploiting the structure of feedforward neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol.7, No.6, pp. 1450–1460, November 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P.J. Huber, Robust Statistics, John Wiley, New York, 1981.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Papoulis, Probability Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 3rd Edition, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Haykin, Neural Networks-A Comprehensive Foundation, IEEE Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Claudio, E.D., Falvo, G., Parisi, R., Perilli, R., Orlandi, G. (1999). Robust Processing of Visual Evoked Potentials. In: Marinaro, M., Tagliaferri, R. (eds) Neural Nets WIRN VIETRI-98. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0811-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0811-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1208-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0811-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics