Abstract
Electrophysiology measurements attempt to get information about neural pathological conditions by measuring electrical cortical responses to appopriate stimuli.
Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) are the responses of occipital visual cortex to time-varying images captured by human eyes. They consist of a quasi-deterministic signal embedded in a strong background noise, produced by Electro-EncephaloGraphic (EEG) activity, sensors and amplifiers.
The VEP analysis is useful for early diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes, neural diseases such as multiple sclerosis, vascular diseases of the brain, check of the visual acuity in non-collaborative patients (children, old-aged people with degenerative neural diseases), and as a support for medico-legal investigations.
The signal-to-noise ratio is usually very low and a statistical averaging on multiple stimuli is required in order to recover an acceptable VEP waveform.
However the background noise is highly non stationary, clearly not Gaussian distributed and in some realization there is a strong quasi-periodic interference due to cerebral α-waves.
Moreover, the loss of attention and blinking may cause the lack or the weakening of the VEP signal in some trials. This impacts the reliability of standard (unweighted) average commonly used to reduce noise effects. So estimators that are resistant to the presence of outliers in the data set should be used for VEP preprocessing.
In this work, traditional robust estimators, such as the trimmed mean, and the median are compared with a modern neural version of the Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) which uses the recently developed Block Recursive Least Squares (BRLS) learning algorithm.
The same IRLS is used for the final deconvolution of brain spikes, that are the main target of VEP analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Visual Electrodiagnostic — A guide to procedures, ISCEV (International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision), 1996.
J.R. Heckenlively, G.B. Arden, Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, Mosby Year Book, 1991.
P.L. Nunez, R.D. Katznelson, Electric Fields in Brain — The Neurophysics of EEG, Oxford University Press, 1981.
A. Remonds, “A Didactic Review of Methods and Applications of EEG Data Processing,” International Course of EEG Data Processing — Paris 1977, EEG Informatics by Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1977.
V.D. Constantinescu, “Revealing the Distinction Between Perception and Cognition Through Intra-individual Variability of Visual Evoked Responses,” International Journal of Bio Medical Computing Vol. 40, pp. 169–178, Elsevier Science, 1996.
S. Panzeri, G. Biella, E.T. Rolls, W.E. Skoggs, A. Treves, “Speed, Noise, Information and the Graded Nature of Neural Responses.” Computation in Neural System, No. 7, pp. 365–370, 1996.
P. Gurzi, G. Biella, A. Spalvieri, “Estimate of Mutual Information Carried by Neuronal Responses From Small Data Samples,” Computation in Neural System, No. 7, pp. 717–725, 1996.
A. Uncini, M. Marchesi, G. Orlandi, F. Piazza, “An Adaptive Neural Network Filter for Evoked Potentials,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1990.
R. Parisi, E.D. Di Claudio, G. Orlandi and B.D. Rao, “A generalized learning paradigm exploiting the structure of feedforward neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol.7, No.6, pp. 1450–1460, November 1996.
P.J. Huber, Robust Statistics, John Wiley, New York, 1981.
A. Papoulis, Probability Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 3rd Edition, 1991.
S. Haykin, Neural Networks-A Comprehensive Foundation, IEEE Press, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Claudio, E.D., Falvo, G., Parisi, R., Perilli, R., Orlandi, G. (1999). Robust Processing of Visual Evoked Potentials. In: Marinaro, M., Tagliaferri, R. (eds) Neural Nets WIRN VIETRI-98. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0811-5_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0811-5_34
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1208-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0811-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive