Fostering Collective Intelligence: Helping Groups Use Visualized Argumentation

  • Albert M. Selvin
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)


This chapter discusses lessons learned from applying visualized argumentation in realtime, face-to-face group settings. Using visualized argumentation in this manner requires special skills and considerations. Argumentation structures, especially when represented with software tools and manipulated in real time according to the needs and goals of the group using them, can be tricky to manage. Of special concern are the multiple issues involved in keeping the representations both coherent and tractable, both for immediate and later use (or re-use). This chapter focuses particularly on the role played by a facilitator - a person charged with managing both the creation and maintenance of the representation as well as the interaction of the group with it, and with each other and with the task at hand. The author has practiced such facilitation with hundreds of groups over a ten-year period and trained other practitioners in the art. The chapter provides a characterization of the practical, aesthetic, and ethical components of facilitating visualized argumentation for groups, with the goal of contributing to the development of improved means (tools, methods, and training) and to the wider spread of this competence and its benefits.


Business Process Problem Situation Argumentation Structure Contingency Planning Visualize Argumentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Conklin E. J., & Burgess Yakemovich K. C. (1991). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3,4), 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Nelson T. H. (1993) Literary machines, (1993 ed.). Sausalito, CA: Mindful Press.Google Scholar
  3. Norman D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Palus C. J., & Drath W. H. (2001). Putting something in the middle: An approach to dialogue. Reflections, 3(2), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Palus C. J., & Horth D. M. (2002). The leader’s edge. Six creative competencies for navigating complex challenges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Selvin, A. (1996). Leveraging existing hypertext functionality to create a customized environment for team analysis. Proceedings of the Second International Vorkshop on Incorporating Hypertext Functionality Into Software Systems. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved on July 1, 2002 from Scholar
  7. Selvin, A. (1998). Facilitating electronically: Using technology to help Maria, (Special Issue on Automated Meeting Support). The Facilitator.Google Scholar
  8. Selvin, A., & Sierhuis, M. (1999, December). Case studies of project compendium in different organizations. Proceedings of the Vorkshop on Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation. paper presented at CSCL’99, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Selvin, A., and Buckingham Shum, S. (1999). Repurposing Requirements: Improving Collaborative Sense-Making over the Lifecycle. paper presented at the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (Profes’ 99), Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
  10. Selvin, A. (1999, February). Supporting collaborative analysis and design with hypertext functionality. Journal of Digital Information, 1(4). Retrieved on July 15, 2002 from Scholar
  11. Shipman F. M., & McCall R. (1994). Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization. In Proceedings of CHI’94: Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 285–291). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  12. Wilber K. (2000). Eye to Eye: The Quest for the New Paradigm (3rd ed.). Boulder: Shambhala Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert M. Selvin
    • 1
  1. 1.Verizon CommunicationsUSA

Personalised recommendations