Death of a Companion Animal: Understanding Human Responses to Bereavement



Research into people’s response to the death of a companion animal demonstrates considerable variability among individuals, ranging from minimal reaction to extreme and protracted distress, and that pet owners themselves may be surprised at their own reaction. Two questions arise from this. First, how can we best predict who is likely to suffer extreme distress at the loss of a pet? Second, what would be helpful to people suffering extreme distress? In this chapter, some of the factors predictive of distress, including owner characteristics, pet characteristics and situational factors are examined. Factors and methods of coping that bereaved pet owners report to be helpful at this time are also discussed. It is argued that understanding both the phenomenon of grief and the variability in response requires a more theoretical approach than is typically taken in empirical investigations. It is proposed that Fiske’s (1992, Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723) theory of social models, intended to categorise human social relationships into four elementary kinds (communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching and market pricing), is also applicable to understanding human–animal relationships. It is argued that this theoretical framework helps to explain a range of empirical observations from the literature on bereavement and suggests further topics for investigation.


Social Model Companion Animal Attachment Figure Communal Sharing Equality Match 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J., & Winchester, G. (1994). Bereavement following the death of a pet. British Journal of Psychology, 85(2), 259–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, L., & Madresh, E. A. (2008). Romantic partners and four-legged friends: An extension of attachment theory to relationships with pets. Anthrozoös, 21(1), 43–56. doi: 10.2752/ 089279308X274056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, H., Irwin, P., Richardson, M., & O’Brien-Malone, A. (2003). When a pet dies: Religious issues, euthanasia and strategies for coping with bereavement. Anthrozoös, 16(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief. In K. J. Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognising hidden sorrow (pp. 3–11). Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
  8. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fedurek, P., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). What does mutual grooming tell us about why chimpanzees groom? Ethology, 115(6), 566–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01637.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field, N. P., Orsini, L., Gavish, R., & Packman, W. (2009). Role of attachment in response to pet loss. Death Studies, 33(4), 334–355. doi: 10.1080/07481180802705783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forbes, A., & Roger, D. (1999). Stress, social support and fear of disclosure. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4(2), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerwolls, M. K., & Labott, S. M. (1994). Adjustment to the death of a companion animal. Anthrozoös, 7(3), 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosse, G. H., & Barnes, M. J. (1994). Human grief resulting from the death of a pet. Anthrozoös, 7(2), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harlow, H. F., & Zimmerman, R. (1959). Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science, 130(3373), 421–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haslam, N., & Fiske, A. P. (1999). Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis. Personal Relationships, 6(2), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hennessy, M. B., Schiml-Webb, P. A., & Deak, T. (2009). Separation, sickness, and depression: A new perspective on an old animal model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 227–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01641.xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Individual differences in emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 351–372). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, T. P., Garrity, T. F., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5(3), 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keddie, K. M. G. (1977). Pathological mourning after the death of a dog. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 21–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kobak, R. (2009). Defining and measuring attachment bonds: Comment on Kurdek (2009). Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 447–449. doi: 10.1037/a0015213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Kurdek, L. A. (2008). Pet dogs as attachment figures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 247–266. doi: 10.1177/026540750787958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurdek, L. A. (2009). Pet dogs as attachment figures for adult owners. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 439–446. doi: 10.1037/a0014979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luiz Adrian, J. A., Deliramich, A. N., & Frueh, B. C. (2009). Complicated grief and posttraumatic stress disorder in humans’ response to the death of pets/animals. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73(3), 176–187. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2009.73.3.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCutcheon, K. A., & Fleming, S. J. (2001). Grief resulting from euthanasia and natural death of companion animals. Journal of Death and Dying, 44(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 77–102. doi: 10.1023/A:1024515519160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, S. C., Kennedy, C., DeVoe, D., Hickey, M., Nelson, T., & Kogan, L. (2009). An examination of changes in oxytocin levels in men and women before and after interaction with a bonded dog. Anthrozoös, 22(1), 31–42. doi: 10.2752/175303708X390455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitani, J. C. (2009). Male chimpanzees form enduring and equitable social bonds. Animal Behaviour, 77(3), 633–640. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parkes, C. M. (1971). Psychosocial transitions: A field for study. Social Science and Medicine, 5(2), 101–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Planchon, L. A., & Templer, D. I. (1996). The correlates of grief after death of pet. Anthrozoös, 9(2–3), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Planchon, L. A., Templer, D. I., Stokes, S., & Keller, J. (2002). Death of a companion cat or dog and human bereavement: Psychosocial variables. Society and Animals, 10(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. L. (1987). The companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60(1), 743–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quackenbush, J., & Glickman, L. (1983). Social services for bereaved pet owners: A retrospective case study in a veterinary teaching hospital. In A. H. Katcher & A. M. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 377–389). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  36. Sanders, C. M. (1988). Risk factors in bereavement outcome. Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shore, E. R., Douglas, D. K., & Riley, M. L. (2010). What’s in it for the companion animal? Pet attachment and college students’ behaviors toward pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0801_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stallones, L. (1994). Pet loss and mental health. Anthrozoös, 7(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stein, D. J., & Vythilingum, B. (2009). Love and attachment: The psychobiology of social bonding. CNS Spectrums, 14, 239–242. Retrieved May 29, 2010, from PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner, W. G. (1997). Evaluation of a pet loss support line. Anthrozoös, 10(4), 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Val-Laillet, D., Meurisse, M., Tillet, Y., & Nowak, R. (2009). Behavioural and neurobiological effects of colostrum ingestion in the newborn lamb associated with filial bonding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(4), 639–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06845.xPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weisman, A. D. (1990). Bereavement and companion animals. Omega, 22(4), 241–248.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, S., & Mills, J. N. (2000). Understanding and responding to grief in companion animal practice. Australian Veterinary Practitioner, 30(2), 55–62.Google Scholar
  44. Young, K. A., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. X. (2008). The neurobiology of social attachment: A comparative approach to behavioral, neuroanatomical, and neurochemical studies. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology, 148, 401–410.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Murdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations