A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations

  • C. J. E. Castle
  • N. P. Waterson
  • E. Pellissier
  • S. Le Bail
Conference paper


The present paper outlines different approaches to pedestrian modelling, classifying them according to their movement and collision avoidance algorithms. An interesting question, not yet fully explored, is whether the simulation output is markedly different between the two main agent-based approaches. The paper explores this question by considering the operational performance of two rail stations in the UK. A software tool with a grid-based approach to pedestrian movement (STEPS 4.0), and a tool with a continuous approach (Legion Studio 2006) have been used to evaluate the gate-line clearance and platform circulation of passengers with respect to proposed station upgrades and future passenger demand. The paper concludes by summarizing the advantages of each approach, in the light of the findings from these studies.


Software Tool Simulation Output Continuous Space Passenger Demand Rail Station 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nelson, H.E., Mowrer, F.E.: Emergency Movement. In: DiNenno, P.J. (eds.) The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Third ed.), pp. 3- 367-3- 380. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Quincy (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuligowski, E.D., Peacock, R.D.: A Review of Building Evacuation Models, Technical Note 1471. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Gaithersburg (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J., Filippidis, L.: A Review of the Methodologies Used in the Computer Simulation of Evacuation from the Built Environment. Building and Environment. 34, 741-749 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoogendoorn, S.P.: Microscopic Simulation of Pedestrian Flows. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. National Academy Press, Washington DC (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castle, C.J.E., Longley, P.A.: Emergency Pedestrian Evacuation Analysis: A Review and Interpretation of Software Applications. In: Sui, D.Z., Cutter, S.L. (Eds.), Geospatial Technologies and Homeland Security: Research Frontiers and Challenges. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buckman, L.T., Leather, J.A.: Modelling Station Congestion the Pedroute Way. Traffic Engineering and Control. 35:6, 373-377 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galea, E.R., Perez Galparsoro, J.M.: A Computer Based Simulation Model for the Prediction of Evacuation from Mass Transport Vehicles. Fire Safety Journal. 22, 341-366 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffmann, N.A., Henson, D.A.: Simulating Transient Evacuation and Pedestrian Movements in Stations. International Conference on Mass Transit Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tobias, K., Schreckenberg, M.: F.A.S.T. - Floor Field and Agent-based Simulation Tool. International Symposium of Transport Simulation 2006(ISTS06), 4 - 6th September. Lausanne, Switzerland (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kretz, T., Bönisch, C., Vortisch, P.: Comparison of Various Methods for the Calculation of the Distance Potential Field. In: Klingsch, W.W.F., Rogsch, C., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M. (eds.), Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helbing, D., Molnár, P.: Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics. Physical Review E. 51, 4282-4286 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson, P.A.: Developing New Techniques for Modelling Crowd Movement. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacDonald, M.: STEPS Software, (2010)
  14. 14.
    Legion, Legion Software, (2010)
  15. 15.
    LUL, Best Practice Guide - Station Modelling With Legion. London Underground Limited, UK (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. E. Castle
    • 1
  • N. P. Waterson
    • 1
  • E. Pellissier
    • 1
  • S. Le Bail
    • 1
  1. 1.Mott MacDonald Ltd.CroydonUK

Personalised recommendations