Discrete Time Martingales and Concentration Inequalities

  • Anirban DasGuptaEmail author
Part of the Springer Texts in Statistics book series (STS)


For an independent sequence of random variables X 1, X 2, , the conditional expectation of the present term of the sequence given the past terms is the same as its unconditional expectation. Martingales let the conditional expectation depend on the past terms, but in a special way. Thus, similar to Markov chains, martingales act as natural models for incorporating dependence into a sequence of observed data. But the value of the theory of martingales is much more than simply its modeling value. Martingales arise, as natural byproducts of the mathematical analysis in an amazing variety of problems in probability and statistics. Therefore, results from martingale theory can be immediately applied to all these situations in order to make deep and useful conclusions about numerous problems in probability and statistics. A particular modern set of applications of martingale methods is in the area of concentration inequalities, which place explicit bounds on probabilities of large deviations of functions of a set of variables from their mean values. This chapter gives a glimpse into some important concentration inequalities, and explains how martingale theory enters there. Martingales form a nearly indispensable tool for probabilists and statisticians alike.


Maximal Inequality Sequential Probability Ratio Test Concentration Inequality Martingale Theory Fair Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Azuma, K. (1967). Weighted sums of certain dependent random variables, Tohoku Math. J., 19, 357–367.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, B.M. (1971). Martingale central limit theorems, Ann. Math. Statist., 42, 59–66.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkholder, D.L. (1973). Distribution function inequalities for martingales, Ann. Prob., 1, 19–42.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkholder, D.L., Davis, B., and Gundy, R. F. (1972). Integral inequalities for convex functions of operators on martingales, Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., Vol. II, 223–240, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  5. Chow, Y.S. and Teicher, H. (2003). Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales, Springer, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung, K.L. (1974). A Course in Probability, Academic Press, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. DasGupta, A. (2010). Fundamentals of Probability: A First Course, Springer, New York.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, B. (1970). On the integrability of the martingale square function, Israel J. Math., 8, 187–190.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devroye, L. (1991). Exponential Inequalities in Nonparametric Estimation, Nonparametric Functional Estimation and Related Topics, 31–44, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Doob, J.L. (1971). What is a martingale?, Amer. Math. Monthly, 78, 451–463.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fristedt, B. and Gray, L. (1997). A Modern Approach to Probability Theory, Birkhäuser, Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, P. and Heyde, C. (1980). Martingale Limit Theory and Its Applications, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Heyde, C. (1972). Martingales: A case for a place in a statistician’s repertoire, Austr. J. Statist., 14, 1–9.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoeffding, W. (1963). Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Amer. Statisto Assoc., 58, 13–30.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karatzas, I. and Shreve, S. (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, Springer, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Karlin, S. and Taylor, H.M. (1975). A First Course in Stochastic Processes, Academic Press, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. McDiarmid, C. (1989). On the Method of Bounded Differences, Surveys in Combinatorics, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes, 141, 148–188, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, D. (1991). Probability with Martingales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations