Advertisement

Introduction to the International Self-Report Study of Delinquency (ISRD-2)

Chapter

Abstract

There is a growing interest in cross-cultural comparisons both among academics and among policy makers, which is related to general trends such as increasing globalization, the advantage of scientific collaboration in terms of building knowledge, and the need for policy makers to be informed about different kinds of solutions to comparable problems. The need for cross-national knowledge on crime is reflected in the United Nations Crime prevention and criminal justice programmes.

Keywords

Delinquent Behaviour Juvenile Delinquency Routine Activity Theory Social Control Theory Country Cluster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arooma, K., & Heiskanen, M. (Eds.). (2008). Crime and Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America 1995–2004. Helsinki, Finland: HEUNI.Google Scholar
  2. Bonoli, G. (1997) ‘Classifying Welfare States: A Two Dimensional Approach’, Journal of Social Policy, 26(3): 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bursik, R., Jr, & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime. The dimension of effective community control. San Francisco: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44:588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currie, C. et al. (2008). Inequalities in Young People’s Health. HBSC International Report from the 2005/2006 Survey. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  7. Decker, S. H., & Weerman, F. (2005). European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.Google Scholar
  8. Dunkel, F., Gebauer, D., Geng, B., & Kesterman, C. (2007). Mare Balticum Youth Survey – Gewalterfahrungen von Jugendlichen im Ostseeraum. Godesberg, Germany: Forum.Google Scholar
  9. Enzmann, D., Marshall, I. H., Killias, M., Junger-Tas, J., Steketee, M., & Gruszczynska, B. (2010). Self-reported delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police and victimization data. European Journal of Criminology, 7(2), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esbensen, F., & Huizinga, D. (1991). Juvenile Victimization and Delinquency. Youth and Society, 23, 208–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 549–550.Google Scholar
  13. Farrington, D.P & D.J. West (1990). The Cambridge study in Delinquent Development: a long-term follow-up of 411 males in: G. Kaiser, H.J. Kerner (eds) Criminality: Personality, Behaviour, Life History, Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Felson, M. (1998), Crime in Everyday Life – Insight and Implications for Society, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks/London, Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrera, M. (1996). ‘The “Southern” Model of Welfare in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grasmick, H. G., Title, C. R., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Bjarnason, T., Ahlstrom, S., Balakireva, O., Kokkevi, A., & Morgan, M. (2004). The ESPAD Report 2003: Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Students in 35 European Countries. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hindelang, M. J.(1973). Causes of delinquency: a Partial Replication and Extension, Social Problems, 20(4), 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. ISRD2 Working Group (2005). Questionnaire ISRD2: Standard Student Questionnaire. Boston, Hamburg, Utrecht, Warsaw, and Zurich: European Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, R. E. (1979). Juvenile Delinquency and its Origins, an Integrated Theoretical Approach. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Junger-Tas, J., Marshall, I. H., Enzmann, D., Killias, M., Steketee, M., & Gruszczynska, B. (Eds.). (2010). Juvenile Delinquency in Europe and Beyond: Results of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Junger-Tas, J., Marshall, I. H., & Ribeaud, D. (2003). Delinquency in an International Perspective: The International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD). The Hague: Kugler.Google Scholar
  25. Junger-Tas, J., & Haen Marshall, I. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Vol. 25, pp. 291–368). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Junger-Tas, J. (1997). Ethnic Minorities and Criminal Justice in the Netherlands. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Vol. 21, pp. 257–310). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Junger-Tas, J. (1996). Youth and Violence in Europe: a Quantitative Review, Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, vol. 5, p.31–58.Google Scholar
  28. Junger-Tas, J., Terlouw, G., & Klein, M. (Eds.). (1994). Delinquent Behavior Among Young People in the Western World: First Results of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study. Amsterdam: Kugler.Google Scholar
  29. Junger-Tas, J (1992), Criminaliteit en Tijd, Justitiële Verkenningen, jrg.18, nr 3, 66–89.Google Scholar
  30. Junger, M. (1990). Delinquency and Ethnicity: an Investigation on Social Factors relating to Delinquency among Moroccan, Turkish, Surinamese and Dutch Boys. Deventer/Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.Google Scholar
  31. Junger, M. (1989). Discrepancies between Police and Self-report Data for Dutch Racial Minorities. British. Journal of Criminology,29, 273–283.Google Scholar
  32. Junger, M., & Marshall, I. H. (1997). The Inter-Ethnic Generalizability of Social Control Theory: An Empirical Test, The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3(1), 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Killias, M. (2001). Précis de Criminologie, 2ème édition. Berne: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
  34. Kohn, M. L. (1987). Cross-national research as an analytic strategy. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic models. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lauritsen, J. L., Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1991). The link between offending and victimization among adolescents. Criminology, 29, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lauritsen, J. M. (Ed.). (2006). Epidata Data Entry, Data Management and Basic Statistical Analysis System. Odense, Denmark: Epidata Association.Google Scholar
  40. Leibfried, S. (1992) ‘Towards a European Welfare State? On Integrating Poverty Regimes into the European Community’, in Z. Ferge and J. E. Kolberg (eds) Social Policy in a Changing Europe, pp. 245–80. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  41. Loeber, R. (1991). Antisocial Behavior: More Enduring than Changeable? American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psyciatry, vol.30, no. 3, p.393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall, I. H. (1996). How Exceptional is the United States? Crime Trends in Europe and the United States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 4(2), 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall, I. H. (1997). Minorities, Migrants, and Crime: Diversity and Similarity across Europe and the United States. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Marshall, I. H., & Webb, V. J. (1994). Self-reported Delinquency in a Mid-western American City. In J. Junger-Tas, G. Terlouw & M. Klein (Eds.), Delinquent Behavior Among Young People in the Western World: First Results of the International Self-report Delinquency Study. (pp. 319–342). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kugler.Google Scholar
  45. Maxfield, K. G., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  46. Moffit, T. E. (1993). Adolescence Limited and Life Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Development Taxonomy. Psychological Review 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newman, G. (1999). Global Report on Crime and Justice: United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention. Centre for International Crime Prevention, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Olweus, D. (1979). Stability of Aggressive Reaction Patterns in Males: a Review Psychological Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 4, p. 852–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olweus, D. (1996). Bully/victim problems at school: Facts and effective interventions. Reclaiming Children and Youth: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 5(1), 15–22.Google Scholar
  50. Pauwels, L., & Svensson, R. (2008). How serious is the problem of item non-response in delinquency scales and eatiological variables? A cross-national inquiry into two classroom PAPA self-report studies in Antwerp and Halmstedt. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pauwels, L., & Svensson, R. (2010). Informal controls and the explanation of propensity to offend: A test in two urban samples. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pease, K., & Hukkula, K. (eds.) (1990). Criminal Justice Systems en Europe and North-America. Helsinki: Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
  53. Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rutter, M. and Giller, H. (1983). Juvenile Delinquency: Trends and Perspectives. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  55. Saint-Arnaid, S., & Bernard, P. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51, 499–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sampson, R. J. (2006). Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future inquiry. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright & K. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 149–167). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  57. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1994). Violent Victimization and Offending: Individual-, Situational- and Community-level Risk Factors. In J. A.J. Reiss & J. A. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and Preventing Violence: Social Influences (Vol. 3, pp. 1–114). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1990). Deviant lifestyles, proximity to crime and the offender-victim link in personal violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 110–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sampson, R. J. (1987). Communities and crime. In T. Hirschi & M. Gottfredson (Eds.), Positive Criminology (pp. 91–114). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Schreck, C. J., Stewart, E. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2008). A reappraisal of the overlap of violent offenders and victims. Criminology, 46(4), 871–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smit, P., Marshall, I. H., & van Gammeren, M. (2008). An empirical approach to country clustering. In K. Aromaa & M. Heiskanen (Eds.), Crime and Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America 1995–2004 (pp. 169–195). Helsinki, Finland: HEUNI.Google Scholar
  66. Straus, M. and International Dating Violence Research Consortium. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence against Women, 10, 790–811.Google Scholar
  67. Svensson, R., Pauwels, L., & Weerman, F. M. (2010). Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 732–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The Self-Report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime. Criminal Justice 2000 (Vol. 4, pp. 33–83). Washington D.C.: US National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  69. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Taking stock of delinquency. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  70. Van Dijk, J.J.M., and C.H.D.Steinmetz (1983). Victimisation Surveys: Beyond Measuring the Volume of Crime, Victimology: An International Journal, vol. 8, p. 291–301.Google Scholar
  71. Van Dijk, J. J. M., van Kesteren, J., & Smit, P. (2008). Criminal Victimisation in International Perspective: Key Findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Hague, The Netherlands: Boom Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  72. Van Hulst, H., & Bos, J. (1993). Criminaliteit van geïmmigreerde Curaçaose jongeren. Utrecht: Onderzoek Collectief Utrecht.Google Scholar
  73. Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M. H., & Hessing, D. (2001). An Empirical Test of a General Theory of Crime: A Four-Nation Comparative Study of Self-Control and the Prediction of Deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vetere, E., & Newman, G. (1977). International Crime Statistics: an Overview from a Comparative Perspective. Abstracts on Criminology and Penology, 17, 251–604.Google Scholar
  75. Wikström, P-O. (1998), Communities and Crime, in: M. Tonry (ed.), The Handbook of Crime and Punishment, 269–302, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wikstrom, P. O. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond Empiricism:Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 13). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.Google Scholar
  77. Wikstrom, P. O., & R., S. (2008). Why are English youth more violent than Swedish youth? A comparative study of the role of crime propensity, lifestyles and their interaction in two cities. European Journal of Criminology, 5(3), 309–330.Google Scholar
  78. Zhang, S., Benson, T., & Deng, X. (2000). A Test-retest Reliability Assessment of the International Self-report Delinquency Instrument. Journal of Criminal Justice 28, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.University of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations