Poverty, Wealth, and Human Aspirations

Chapter

Abstract

The years that ended the first decade of the new millennium were not kind to the economic situations of most people and institutions in the United States and much of the rest of the world, nor to the economic and financial theories that once explained and operated our economies so well, or so it seemed. For the majority of people it has become more difficult to meet basic obligations such as rent or mortgage payments or feeding or educating a family, and especially to do this when diminishing asset values, particularly home ­values, threaten future financial security. Ten to twenty percent of Americans have no job at all, a poorly paying job in the service sector, or work part time. Incomes for the middle class have been stagnant at best for decades while the size of the middle class shrinks. Many, perhaps most, new college graduates have had to greatly reduce their aspirations. The stock market and real estate have become far less reliable ways to amass wealth. Some 46 of our 50 states and many of our municipalities face crippling budget deficits, and many colleges, pension plans, charities, and other institutions are operating with diminished funds or going bankrupt. Even the U.S. government faces the prospect of seeing its credit rating diminished. “Tea Partiers” seek to cut debt and the role of government even while poll after poll shows the public does not want its health or most other benefits cut. There are many pronouncements about “waiting, or borrowing, until the economy grows again,” but little evidence of that growth happening. The inflation-corrected GDP of the United States was about the same in 2010 as it was in 2004.

Keywords

United States Gross Domestic Product Stock Market Labor Productivity Human Labor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehouse, M. 2010. Economists’ Grail: A Post-Crash Model. Wall Street Journal, November 30.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stiglitz, J. 2010. Needed: A new economic paradigm. Financial Times, Aug 20, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gladwell, M. Outlier: The Story of Success. NewYork: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrenfeld, P. 1978. The Arrogance of Humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobb, C.W. and. Douglass, P.H. 1928. A theory of production. American Economic Review 18 Supplement 139–156.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnett, H. and Morse, C. 1963. Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denison, E.F. 1989. Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry, an Evaluation and an Alternative. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cleveland, C.J. 1991. Natural resource scarcity and economic growth revisited: Economic and ­biophysical perspectives. In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, pp. 289–317.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kummel, R. 1989. Energy as a factor of production and entropy as a pollution indicator in macroeconomic modeling. Ecological Economics. 1: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ayres, R. and Warr, D., 2005. Accounting for growth: The role of physical work. Change and Economic Dynamics 16: 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, C.A.S. and K. Klitgaard. 2006. The Need for a New, Biophysical-Based Paradigm in Economics for the Second Half of the Age of Oil. Journal of Transdisciplinary Research Volume. 1, Issue 1, 4–22.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polanyi, K., C. M. Arensberg and H. W. Pearson eds. 1965 Trade and Market in the Early Empires Economies in History and Theory. Free Press. New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanson, D. M. and M. Galeti. 2009. Forgotten Megafauna. Science. Volume. 324, 42–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin, P.S. 1973. The Discovery of America. Science. Volume. 179: 969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tainter, J. 1988 The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diamond, J. 2004 Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. Viking Press. New York.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crosby, Alfred. 1986 Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diamond, J. 1997 Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zinn, Howard 1980. A People’s History of the United States. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The two greatest causes for war among the perhaps one third of the colonial population who supported independence was basically resource scarcity – the cutting off of the trans-Allegheny frontier, first in 1763 by means of the Proclamation Act, and then later in 1775, with greater enforcement, with the Quebec act. Open rebellion soon followed.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perlin, J. 1989 A Forest Journey: The Role of Wood and Civilization. Harvard University Press. Norton, N.Y.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greene, A. N. 2008 Horses at work: Harnessing Power in Industrial America. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yergin, Daniel 1991 The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowles, S., D. Gordon, T. Weisskop 1990 After the Wasteland. ME Sharpe. Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the Earth. Fritz Haber, Car Bosch and the Transformation of Western Food Production. MIT Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meadows, D., D. Meadows and J. Randers. 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishers. White River, V.T.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ehrlich, P. 1968 The Population Bomb. Ballantine Books. New York.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hubbert, M.K. 1969. Energy Resources. In the National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council, Committee on Resources and Man: A Study and Recommendations. W. H. Freeman. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hardesty, John, Clement, Norris C. and Jencks, Clinton E. 1971. The political economy of environmental destruction. Review of Radical Political Economics 3(4): 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    England, Richard and Bluestone, Barry. 1971. Ecology and class conflict. Review of Radical Political Economics 3(4) 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Daly, Herman. Towards a Steady-State Economy. 1973. London: W.H. Freeman and Company, Ltd.Tables.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Passell, P, M. Roberts, and L. Ross. 2 April 1972. Review of Limits to Growth. New York Times Book Review.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Odum, H. T. 1973 Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cleveland, C., R. Costanza, C. Hall and R. Kaufmann. 1984. Energy and the U.S. Economy. A Biophysical Perspective. Science. Volume. 225, 890–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jorgenson, D. W., and Z. Grilliches. 1967. The Explanation of Productivity Change. Review of Economic Studies. 249–283.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maddala, G. S. 1965. Productivity and Technical Change in the Bituminous Coal Industry. Journal of Political Economy. 352–265.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reynolds, D. 2000. Soviet Economic Decline: Did an Oil Crisis Cause the Transition in the Soviet Union? Journal of Energy and Development. Volume. 24, 65–82.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Campbell, C., and J. Laherrere. 1998. The End of Cheap Oil. Scientific American. March: 78–83.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stern, N. 2007 The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luce, E. 2010 “Goodbye, American Dream. The Crisis of Middle-Class America”. The Financial Times. 30 July 2010.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brinkbaumer, K., Hujer, M.. Muller P. Schulz, T. 2010. Is the American Dream Over? Das Spiegel 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental & Forest Biology and Graduate Program in Environmental Science College of Environmental Science & ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Social SciencesWells CollegeAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations