Agricultural and Rural Watersheds
Identifying all relevant human and animal fecal sources is a basic requirement for target-oriented water resource management in agricultural and rural watersheds (ARW). As outlined, microbial source tracking (MST) is most suitably applied in concert with other methods within a broader conceptual framework of fecal pollution analysis. Two case studies – covering surface and karstic groundwater resources within ARW – are presented with the following features in common: public importance, problem formulation based on catchment-based pollution source profiling or modeling, and integrated use of several methods and parameters for fecal source characterization and identification at the water resource level. Possibilities and limitations of currently available MST tools, as well as fundamental requirements for their successful application and combination with other methods, are discussed. The use of multiple tools helps overcome specific limitations of individual methods, increases the robustness of the study, improves confidence in the results, or can help identify issues for further investigation.
KeywordsWater quality Fecal pollution Microbial source tracking Human vs. animal pollution ground and surface water Library dependent and independent methods
- BrazosRiverAuthority (2006). Lake Granbury Watershed Protection Plan In: http://www.brazos.org/gbWPP.asp Retrieved January 21 2010.
- BrazosRiverAuthority (2008). Lake Granbury Water Quality Modeling In: http://www.brazos.org/gbWPP/12-3-2008_LG_Modeling.pdf Retrieved January 21 2010.
- Cotruvo, J. A., A. Dufour, et al., (eds) (2004). Waterborn Zoonoses. IWA Publishing, London.Google Scholar
- Farnleitner, A. H., H. Stadler, et al. (2008). Methods and strategies for alpine karstic water resource management: opening pollution microbiology’s “black box”. World Water Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, IWA.Google Scholar
- Fewtrell, L. and J. Bartram, (eds) (2002). Water Quality: Guidlines, Standards and Health. IWA Publishing, Padstone.Google Scholar
- Ford, D. C. and P. Williams (2007). Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Geldreich, E. E. (1978). Bacterial populations and indicator concepts in feces, sewage, stormwater and solid wastes. In: G. Berg, (ed) Indicators of viruses in water and food Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. pp. 51–97.Google Scholar
- Grayson, R., P. Kay, et al. (2008). The use of GIS and multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) to identify agricultural land management practices which cause surface water pollution in drinking water supply catchments. Water Sci Technol 59(9): 1797–802.Google Scholar
- Ishii, S. and M. J. Sadowsky (2008). Escherichia coli in the environment: implications for water quality and human health. Microbes and Environments 23: 101–108.Google Scholar
- ISO (2000). Water Quality – Detection and Enumeration of Escherichia coli and Coliform Bacteria – Part 1: Membrane Filtration Method (ISO 9308-1: 2000). In: International Organization of Standardization Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- ISO (2000). Water Quality – Detection and Enumeration of Intestinal Enterococci – Part 2: Membrane Filtration Method (ISO 7899-2: 2000). International Organization of Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
- ISO (2002). Water Quality – Detection and Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens – Part 2: Method by Membrane filtration (ISO/CD 6461-2). International Organization of Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
- Kollanur, D., Reischer, G.H., Sommer, R., Wehrspaun, C., Stadler, H, Mach, R.L., Zerobin. W. and A. H. Farnleitner (submitted) Quantitative Assessment of Faecal Pollution Sources in Alpine Spring Catchments as a Basis for Microbial Hazard – and Risk Assessment. Water Science and Technology. Google Scholar
- Medema, G. J., S. Shaw, et al. (2003). Catchment characterisation and source water quality In: A. Dufour, M. Snozzi, W. Koster, et al., (ed) Assessing microbial safety of drinking water, IWA Publishing, London.Google Scholar
- Reischer, G. H., D. Kollanur, et al. (2011). A hypothesis-driven approach for the identification of fecal pollution sources in water resources. Environ Sci Technol 45(9): 4038–4045.Google Scholar
- Soller, J. A., M. E. Schoen, et al. (2010). Estimated human health risks from exposure to recreational waters impacted by human and non-human sources of faecal contamination. Water Research 44(16): 4674–4691.Google Scholar
- Stadler, H., Klock, E., Skritek, P., Mach, R.L., Zerobin, W. and Farnleitner, A.H. (2010). The spectral absorbance coefficient at 254nm as a near real time early warning proxy for detecting faecal pollution events at alpine karst water resources. Water Sci Technol 62(8): 1898–1906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teague, A., R. Karthikeyan, et al. (2009). Spatially explicit load enrichment calculation tool to identify potential E. coli sources in watersheds. Transactions of the ASABE 52(4): 1109–1120.Google Scholar
- TexasA&MAgriLifeResearch (2006). Watershed Protection Plan Development for Buck Creek, TSSWCB Project # 06-11, Quality Assurance Project Plan. In: http://www.tsswcb.state.tx.us/files/docs/nps-319/projects/06-11_QA-BUCKCRKWPP-09-24-08.pdf. Retrieved January 21 2010.
- USEPA (2005). Microbial Source Tracking Guide Document. Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2006). Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water by membrane filtration using modified membrane-thermotolerant Escherichia coli agar (Modified mTEC). Office of Research and Development, Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
- Versalovic, J., M. Schneider, et al. (1994). Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Cell Biol 5: 25–40.Google Scholar
- WHO (2004). Guidlines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organisation, Geneva.Google Scholar