Distinguishing between Fertilization Failure and Early Pregnancy Loss when Identifying Male-Mediated Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

  • Sally D. Perreault
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 518)

Abstract

Successful reproduction depends upon the precise orchestration of many physiological processes. With respect to male reproductive performance, normal copulatory behavior and ejaculatory function are required to insure that semen is deposited in the female tract. Then, a sufficient number of sperm must reach the site of fertilization at the optimal time for the oocyte to be fertilized, and those sperm that reach the oocyte must be capable of fertilizing the egg (binding and penetrating the zona pellucida and fusing with the oolemma). Finally, the fused spermatozoon must be intact genetically in order to support normal embryonic and postnatal development.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, I.-D., Baumgartner, A., Gonda, H., Friedman, M.A. and Skerhut, M., 2000, 1-Aminobenotriazole inhibits acrylamide-induccd dominant lethal effects in spermatids of male mice. Mutagenesis. 15:133–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapin, R.E. and Sloane, R.A., 1997, Reproductive assessment by continuous breeding: evolving study design and summaries of ninety studies. Environ Health Perspect. 105, Supple 1:199–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapin, R.E., Fail, P.A., George, J.D., Grizzle, T.B., Heindel, J.J., Harry, G.J., Collins, B.J. and Teague, J., 1995, The reproductive and neural toxicities of acrylamide and three analogues in Swiss mice, evaluated using the continuous breeding protocol. Fund Appl Toxicol. 27:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clegg, E.D., Perreault, S.D. and Klinefelter, G.R., 2001, Assessment of Male Reproductive Toxicity, in: Principles and Methods of Toxicology, Fourth Edition, A. Wallace Hayes, ed., Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, p. 1263.Google Scholar
  5. Dearfield, K.L., Abernathy, C.O., Ottley, M.S., Brantner, J.H. and Hayes, P.F., 1988, Acrylamide: its metabolism, developmental and reproductive effects, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. Mutat. Res. 195:45–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dearfield, K.L., Douglas, G.R., Ehling U.H., Moore, M.M., Sega, G.A. and Brusick, D.J., 1995, Acrylamide: a review of its genotoxicity and an assessment of heritable genetic risk. Mutation Res. 330:71–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evenson, D.P., Jost, L.K., Marshall, D., Zinaman, M.J., Clegg, E., Purvis, K., de Angelis, P., and Claussen, O.P., 1999, Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Human Reprod. 14:1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evenson, D.P., Larson, K., and Jost, L.K., 2002, Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation related to male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl. 23:25–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Generoso, W.M., Sega, G.A., Lockhart, A.M., Hughes, L.A., Cain, K.T., Cacheiro, N.L.A., and Shelby, M.D., 1996, Dominant lethal mutations, heritable translocations, and unscheduled DNA synthesis induced in male mouse germ cells by glycidamide, a metabolite of acrylamide. Mutat Res. 371:175–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, S., Auletta, A., Fabricant, R., Kapp, M., Sheu, C., Springer, J., and Whitfield, B., 1985, Current status of bioassays in genetic toxicology: The dominant lethal test. Mutation Res. 154:49–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harder, B., 2002, Cancer link cooks up doubt. Heating may form potential carcinogen in food. Science News. 161:277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland, N., Ahlborn, T., Turteltaub, K., Markee, C., Moore II, D., Wyrobek, A.J. and Smith, M.T., 1999, Acrylamide causes preimplantation abnormalities in embryos and induces chromatin-adducts in male germ cells of mice. Reprod Toxicol. 13:167–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Irvine, D.S., Twigg, J.P., Gordon, E.L., Fulton, N., Milne, P.A., and Aitken R.J., 2000, DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl. 21: 33–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Janny, L. and Menezo, Y.J.R., 1994, Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev. 38:36–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marchetti, F., Lowe, X., Bishop, J. and Wyrobek, A.J., 1997, Induction of chromosomal aberrations in mouse zygotes by acrylamide treatment of male germ cells and their correlation with dominant lethality and heritable translocations. Environ Mol Mutagen. 30:410–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorman, W.J., Ahlers, H.W., Chapin, R.E., Daston, G.P., Foster, P.M.D., Kavlock, R.J., Morawetz, J.S., Schnorr, T.M. and Schrader, S.M., 2000, Prioritization of NTP reproductive toxicants for field studies. Reprod Toxicol. 14:293–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pacchierotti, F., Tiveron, C, D’Archivio, M., Bassani, B., Cordelli, E., Leter, G., and Spano, M, 1994, Acrylamide-induced chromosomal damage in male mouse germ cells detected by cytogenetic analysis of one-cell zygotes. Mutat Res. 309:273–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perreault, S.D. and Mattson, B.A., 1993, Recovery and morphological evaluation of oocytes, zygotes and preimplantation embryos, in: Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 3, Part B, Female Reproductive Toxicology, J.J. Heindel and R.E. Chapin (eds.), Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, p. 110.Google Scholar
  19. Perreault, S.D., 1998, Gamete Toxicology: The Impact of New Technologies, in: K. Korach, ed., Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, p., 635.Google Scholar
  20. Perreault, S.D., Aitken, R.J., Baker, H.W.G., Evenson, D.P., Huszar, G., Irvine, D.S., Morris, I.D., Morris, R.A., Robbins, W.A., Sakkas, D., Spano, M., and Wyrobek, A.J., 2003, Integrating new tests of sperm genetic integrity into semen analysis: Breakout group discussion, in: Advances in Male-Mediated Developmental Toxicity, ed. B. Robaire and B. Hales, Kluwer-Plenum Press, in press.Google Scholar
  21. Rohrborn, G., 1970, The dominant lethals: Method and cytogenetic examination of early cleavage stages, in: Chemical Mutagenesis in Mammals and Man, F. Vogel and G. Rohrborn, eds., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, p.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryu, H.M., Lin, W.W., Lamb, D.J., Chuang, W., Lipshultz, L.I., and Bishoff, F.Z., 2001, Increased chromosome X, Y, and 18 nondisjunction in sperm from infertile patients that were identified as normal by strict morphology: implication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 76:879–883.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sega, G.A., Alcota, R.P.V., Tancongco, C.P. and Brimer, P.A., 1986, Acrylamide binding to the DNA and protamine of spermiogenic stages in the mouse and its relationship to genetic damage. Mutat Res. 216:221–230.Google Scholar
  24. Shelby, M.D., Cain, K.T., Hughes, L.A., Braden, P.W., and Generoso, W.M., 1986, Dominant lethal effects of acrylamide in male mice. Mutat Res. 173:35–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, M.K., Zenick, H., Preston, R.J., George, E.L. and Long, R.E., 1986, Dominant lethal effects of subchronic acrylamide administration in the male Long-Evans rat, Mutat Res. 173:273–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spano, M., Bonde, J.P., Hjollund, H.I., Kolstad, H.A., Cordelli, E, and Leter, G., 2000, Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Fertil Steril. 73:43–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sublet, V.H., Zenick, H., and Smith, M.K., 1989, Factors associated with reduced fertility and implantation rates in females mated to acrylamide-treated rats. Toxicology. 55:53–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tareke, E., Rydberg, P., Karlsson, P., Ericksson, S., and Tornqvist, M., 2000, Acrylamide: A cooking carcinogen?. Chem Res Toxicol. 13:517–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Templado, C., Hoang, T., Greene, C, Rademaker, Z., Chernos, J., and Martin, R., 2002, Aneuploid spermatozoa in infertile men: teratozoospermia. Mol Reprod Dev. 61:200–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Titenko-Holland, N., Ahlborn, T., Lowe, X., Shang, N., Smith, M.T. and Wyrobek, A.J., 1998, Micronuclei and developmental abnormalities in 4-day mouse embryos after paternal treatment with acrylamide, Environ. Molec Mutagen. 31:206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tyl, R.W., Friedman, M.A., Losco, P.E., Fisher, L.C., lohnson, K.A., Storther, D.E. and Wolf, C.H., 2000a, Rat two-generation reproduction and dominant lethal study of acrylamide in drinking water. Reprod Toxicol. 14:385–401.Google Scholar
  32. Tyl, R.W., Marr, M.C., Myers, C.B., Ross, W.P., and Friedman, M.A., 2000b, Relationship between acrylamide reproductive and neurotoxicity in male rats. Reprod Toxicol. 14:147–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998, Health Effect Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.3800 Reproduction and Fertility Effects, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996, Guidelines for reproductive toxicity risk assessment. Fed. Reg., 61(212):56274.Google Scholar
  35. Working, P.K., Bentley, K.S., Hurtt, M.E. and Mohr, K.L., 1987, Comparison of the dominant lethal effects of acrylonitrile and acrylamide in male Fischer 344 rats. Mutagenesis. 2:215–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zenick, H., Hope, E. and Smith, M.K., 1986, Reproductive toxicity associated with acrylamide treatment in male and female rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 17:457–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DISCLAIMER: This document has been reviewed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally D. Perreault
    • 1
  1. 1.Reproductive Toxicology DivisionU.S. EPA, ORD, NHEERL Research Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations