To Read but not to Read: Identifying and Understanding the Nature of Poor Reading Comprehension in Children

  • Kate Nation
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 25)

Abstract

Very broadly, it is possible to think of two sets of skills a child needs to master in order to become a skilled reader of an alphabetic language. First and foremost, they need to learn to decode. Learning that tetters map to speech sounds in a systematic way provides children with a rudimentary reading system that allows them to read words, even novel words they have never seen before. With practice and exposure to print, children’s decoding skills soon become fast, flexible, and efficient. However, the ultimate goal of reading is to understand what has been written, and although good decoding skills are an essential component of skilled reading, they are no guarantee that successful comprehension will follow. Thus, the other set of skills children need if they are to read successfully are concerned with comprehension. As encapsulated in (1986) simple model, skilled reading requires adequate decoding and comprehension: Neither skill alone is sufficient. Generally, there is a strong association between decoding and comprehension: Children who are good at decoding tend to be good at comprehending and similarly, children with weak decoding skills tend to have difficulty comprehending. For some children however, their proficiency at reading words and texts stands in stark contrast to the difficulty they have with understanding what they have read. Of course, there are many children who have difficulty with reading comprehension and decoding (sometimes referred to as garden-variety poor readers), but it is children who have poor comprehension despite normal decoding who are the focus of this chapter.

Keywords

Word Recognition Reading Comprehension Language Impairment Specific Language Impairment Learn Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishop, D.V.M., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The nature of the relation between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J.V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cain K., Oakhill J.V., Barnes M.A., Bryant P.E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29, 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Tomblin, J.B., & Zhang, X. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45, 1142–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennis, M. & Barnes, M.A. (1993). Oral discourse after early-onset hydrocephalus: linguistic ambiguity, figurative language, speech acts, and script-based inferences. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 18, 639–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis, M., Lazenby, A.L., & Lockyer, L. (2001). Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 47–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1996). British Ability Scales. Second Edition. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  9. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grigorenko, E.L., Klin, A., Pauls, D.L., Senft, R., Hooper, C. & Volkmar, F. (2002). A descriptive study of hyperlexia in a clinically referred sample of children with developmental delays. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nation, K. (1999). Reading skills in hyperlexia: a developmental perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 338–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C., & Durand, M. (under review). Hidden language impairments in children: parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment?Google Scholar
  15. Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). General cognitive ability in children with poor reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 549–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing skills and the development of word recognition: evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neale, M. D. (1997). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised (NARA-II). Windsor, UK: NFER.Google Scholar
  21. Oakhill, J.V. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders’ memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oakhill, J.V. (1994). Individual differences in children’s text comprehension. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Palincsar, A.S. and Brown, A. L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelletier, P. M., Ahmad, S. A., & Rourke, B. P. (2001). Classification rules for basic phonological processing disabilities and nonverbal learning difficulties: formulation and external validity. Child Neuropsychology, 7, 84–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Richman, L.C., & Wood, K. M. (2002). Learning disability subtypes: classification of high functioning hyperlexia. Brain and Language, 82, 10–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rourke, B.P. (1989). Nonverbal learning difficulties: the syndrome and the model. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stothard, S.E., & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: the role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Worling, D. E., Humphries, T., Tannock, R. (2001). Spatial and emotional aspects of language inferencing in nonverbal learning difficulties. Brain and Language, 70, 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. V. (1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Nation
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations